Ryan Seggerman and Andres Martin will play each other in the qualifications of the Mexico City Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:30 pm on ESTADIO RAFAEL OSUNA. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ryan Seggerman who should win in 3 sets.
Ryan Seggerman -> 1.85
Andres Martin -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Ryan Seggerman vs. Andres Martin
This will be the 2nd time that Ryan Seggerman and Andres Martin clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Martin (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
The last time that they fought against each other, Martin won 6-4 6-3 in the 1st round in M25 Southaven back in 2023.
Ryan Seggerman
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 7-14 | 3-4 | 2-7 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 26-24 | 13-11 | 12-8 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-13 | 25-11 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 417, Seggerman reached the qualifications after beating Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications against Fernando Rubio Fierros, Ryan recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-74 6-4 6-4). During the match, Seggerman scored 108 points vs Fernando Rubio Fierros’s 102. Ryan was exceptionally aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Regarding the service games, Seggerman managed to score 11 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Ryan Seggerman lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Seggerman put 58% of his first serves in, winning 79% (44/56) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (20/40) on the 2nd serve. Seggerman broke Fernando Rubio Fierros 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Seggerman has a winning match record in the last 4 years having won 58% of his matches (62-44). 1-1 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Seggerman has an aggregate15-10 record in the last 4 years on clay.
The American has a compiled 2-4 win-loss record in 2025, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Mexico City Challenger
Andres Martin
20 - 7win/loss
264
264
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 47-28 | 32-18 | 9-4 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 19-16 | 14-11 | 0-1 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-17 | 14-11 | 1-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-8 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 449, Andres reached the qualifications after defeating Cannon Kingsley 6-1 6-7(3) 6-3.
In the qualifications, The American defeated Kingsley (6-1 6-73 6-3). During the match Martin scored 104 points vs Kingsley’s 88. The American was very aggressive to blast 37 winners.
About the serving games, Martin was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Andres Martin was exceptionally effective on serve to win 77% (37/48) of his 1st serve and 64% (28/44) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Andres broke Kingsley 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
The American’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Kingston and M25 Calabasas.
Martin has an aggregate 19-7 win-loss record in 2025, 5-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Mexico City Challenger
Andres has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Seggerman | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 33 | 29 |
| Pts | 108-102 | 104-88 |
| Total Points | 210 | 192 |
| Winners | 44 | 37 |
| %Winners | 41% | 36% |
Both Seggerman and Martin played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Ryan Seggerman lost 1 set, while Andres Martin conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Seggerman and Martin have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Seggerman played 4 games more than Martin. Ryan scored 44 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Andres scored 37 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Seggerman | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 11 | 0 |
| 1st in | 56/96 | 48/92 |
| %1st in | 58% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 44/56 | 37/48 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 20/40 | 28/44 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 64% |
Seggerman struck 11 aces . Martin didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Seggerman won 79% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Martin won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Seggerman | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 3/8 |
| % Converted | 40% | 38% |
| Conceded | 4 | 2 |
| Saved | 2 | 2 |
| % Saved | 50% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Seggerman broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Ryan conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Andres broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. Martin was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Seggerman | |||
| Q1 Fernando Rubio Fierros | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-74 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 108-102 | 108-102 | |
| Total points | 210 | 210 | |
| Winners | 44 | 44 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 56/96 | 56/96 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 44/56 | 44/56 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/40 | 20/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Martin | |||
| Q1 Kingsley | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-73 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 104-88 | 104-88 | |
| Total points | 192 | 192 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 48/92 | 48/92 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 37/48 | 37/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 28/44 | 28/44 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Mateus De Carvalho CardosoDe Carvalho Cardoso (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernard TomicTomic – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro SakamotoSakamoto – Kiranpal PannuPannu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Maxime CressyCressy (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vladyslav OrlovOrlov – Juan Carlos Manuel AguilarCarlos Manuel Aguilar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (1-4) – H2H and prediction
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Neil OberleitnerOberleitner – Alafia AyeniAyeni (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – (0-1) – H2H and prediction