Sumit Nagal and Federico Iannaccone will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Monza Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sumit Nagal who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sumit Nagal is the pick to win this match.
Sumit Nagal -> 1.35
Federico Iannaccone -> 2.99
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Sumit Nagal vs. Federico Iannaccone
There is no head to head record between Sumit Nagal and Federico Iannaccone since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Sumit Nagal
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 8-10 | 2-3 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 32-29 | 15-13 | 16-11 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 137, the Indian reached the qualifications after beating Ergi Kirkin 5-7 7-6(2) 6-2.
In the qualifications against Kirkin, The Indian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 7-62 6-2). During the match, Nagal scored 124 points vs Kirkin’s 105. Sumit was very aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Talking about the service games, Nagal couldn’t to score even 1 ace throughout the match and he committed only 3 double faults. Sumit Nagal lost the serve 5 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Nagal put 70% of his first serves in, winning 62% (46/74) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (17/31) on the 2nd serve. Nagal broke Kirkin 6 times after converting 50% of his break points (6/12).
Nagal has favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (291-211). 5-6 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Nagal has a compiled 220-133 match record in the last years on clay.
Sumit has a compiled 7-9 win-loss record in 2025, 5-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Monza Challenger
The Indian has never competed in this tournament before.
Federico Iannaccone
7 - 5win/loss
536
443
LWLLWWLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 10-9 | 5-4 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 43-81 | 17-59 | 25-20 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-30 | 13-6 | 32-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-24 | 11-10 | 15-11 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-15 | 0-1 | 16-10 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 485, Federico got to the qualifications after beating Stefano Travaglia 4-6 6-2 6-3.
In the qualifications against Travaglia, The Italian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-2 6-3). During the match Iannaccone scored 88 points vs Travaglia’s 81. Iannaccone was very aggressive to blast 37 winners.
About the serving games, Iannaccone scored 2 aces and he was exceptionally consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Federico Iannaccone lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Iannaccone put 69% of his first serves in, winning 61% (37/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 67% (18/27) on the 2nd serve. Iannaccone broke Travaglia 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
The Italian’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M15 Manacor.
Iannaccone has an aggregate 7-5 win-loss record in 2025, 2-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nagal | Iannaccone |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 33 | 27 |
| Pts | 124-105 | 88-81 |
| Total Points | 229 | 169 |
| Winners | 46 | 37 |
| %Winners | 37% | 42% |
Both Nagal and Iannaccone played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Sumit Nagal conceded 1 set, while Federico Iannaccone conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Nagal and Iannaccone have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Nagal played 6 games more than Iannaccone. Nagal scored 46 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Iannaccone made 37 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nagal | Iannaccone |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 2 |
| 1st in | 74/105 | 61/88 |
| %1st in | 70% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 46/74 | 37/61 |
| %1st pts | 62% | 61% |
| 2nd pts | 17/31 | 18/27 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 67% |
Nagal didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Iannaccone made 2 aces . Nagal won 62% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Iannaccone won 61% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nagal | Iannaccone |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 5 |
| Converted | 6/12 | 5/10 |
| % Converted | 50% | 50% |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 |
| Saved | 2 | 4 |
| % Saved | 29% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 3 |
Sumit broke his opponent 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. Sumit conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 29% of the break points that he conceded. Federico broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. Federico conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nagal | |||
| Q1 Kirkin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 7-62 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 124-105 | 124-105 | |
| Total points | 229 | 229 | |
| Winners | 46 | 46 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 74/105 | 74/105 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 46/74 | 46/74 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/31 | 17/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/12 | 6/12 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 2/7 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 29% | 29% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Iannaccone | |||
| Q1 Travaglia |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 88-81 | 88-81 | |
| Total points | 169 | 169 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 61/88 | 61/88 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 37/61 | 37/61 | |
| % 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/27 | 18/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLWLLL
LWLLWWLWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Daniel EvansEvans (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Federico IannacconeIannaccone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Khumoun SultanovSultanov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PicchionePicchione – Remy BertolaBertola (2-0) – H2H and prediction
