Pedro Cachin and Jakub Paul will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Madrid Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 11:00 am on PISTA CENTRAL C.MADRID. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Pedro Cachin who should win in 3 sets.
Pedro Cachin -> 1.44
Jakub Paul -> 2.625
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Pedro Cachin vs. Jakub Paul
There is no head to head record between Pedro Cachin and Jakub Paul since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Pedro Cachin
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 14-12 | 5-2 | 7-8 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 11-26 | 0-6 | 11-19 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-32 | 4-8 | 28-19 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 49-22 | 5-4 | 41-13 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-25 | 0-0 | 47-24 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 294, Cachin reached the qualifications after defeating David Jorda Sanchis 6-1 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Jorda Sanchis (6-1 6-2). During the match, Cachin scored 57 points vs Jorda Sanchis’s 30. Pedro was quite aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Regarding the service games, Cachin blasted 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Pedro Cachin was pretty effective on serve to win 75% (18/24) of his 1st serve and 80% (12/15) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Cachin broke Jorda Sanchis 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Cachin has favorable record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (314-227). 4-3 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Cachin has an aggregate 283-175 match record in the last years on clay.
The Argentine has a compiled 11-7 win-loss record in 2025, 4-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Madrid Challenger
Jakub Paul
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 35-21 | 14-5 | 12-7 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 44-27 | 15-9 | 17-11 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-24 | 20-4 | 14-12 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2022 | 25-26 | 4-4 | 20-18 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 34-21 | 4-3 | 17-10 | 11-7 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 338 (career-high), Jakub reached the qualifications after beating Nikoloz Basilashvili 4-6 6-1 6-2.
In the qualifications against Basilashvili, Jakub recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-1 6-2). During the match Paul scored 90 points vs Basilashvili’s 78. The Swiss was exceptionally aggressive to blast 41 winners.
About the serving games, Paul struck 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Jakub Paul lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Paul put 68% of his first serves in, winning 65% (41/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (15/30) on the 2nd serve. Jakub broke Basilashvili 5 times after converting 33% of his break points (5/15).
The Swiss’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Koblenz Challenger.
Paul has an overall 17-8 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cachin | Paul |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 25 |
| Pts | 57-30 | 90-78 |
| Total Points | 87 | 168 |
| Winners | 18 | 41 |
| %Winners | 32% | 46% |
Both Cachin and Paul played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Jakub Paul conceded 1 set while Pedro Cachin hasn’t dropped a set so far. Cachin has played 1 set(s) less than Paul (2 vs 3). Therefore, Cachin played 10 games less than Paul. The Argentine scored 18 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Jakub made 41 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cachin | Paul |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 2 |
| 1st in | 24/39 | 63/93 |
| %1st in | 62% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 18/24 | 41/63 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 12/15 | 15/30 |
| %2nd pts | 80% | 50% |
Cachin struck 2 aces . Paul blasted 2 aces . Cachin won 75% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 80% of the points. On the other side, Paul won 65% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cachin | Paul |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/15 |
| % Converted | 63% | 33% |
| Conceded | 3 | 7 |
| Saved | 2 | 5 |
| % Saved | 67% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Pedro broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Pedro lost his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Jakub broke his opponent 5 times with a 33% conversion rate. Paul conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
| Cachin | |||
| Q1 Jorda Sanchis | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 57-30 | 57-30 | |
| Total points | 87 | 87 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 24/39 | 24/39 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 18/24 | 18/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/15 | 12/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 80% | 80% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Paul | |||
| Q1 Basilashvili | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 90-78 | 90-78 | |
| Total points | 168 | 168 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 63/93 | 63/93 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 41/63 | 41/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/30 | 15/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/15 | 5/15 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Norbert GombosGombos – Ivan GakhovGakhov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Alex Marti PujolrasMarti Pujolras (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Borna CoricCoric – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Hugo DellienDellien (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – Benjamin HassanHassan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Ryan NijboerNijboer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jakub PaulPaul – Pedro CachinCachin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon – Valentin RoyerRoyer (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction