Emma Navarro and Amanda Anisimova will fight against each other in the quarter of the Credit One Charleston Open for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 6:00 pm on CREDIT ONE STADIUM. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Amanda Anisimova who should win in 3 sets.
Amanda Anisimova -> 1.81
Emma Navarro -> 2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Emma Navarro vs. Amanda Anisimova
This will be the 3rd time that Emma Navarro and Amanda Anisimova square off. The head to head is 2-0 for Anisimova (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on clay.
The last time that they fought against each other, Anisimova won 6-3 2-6 6-2 in the semifinal in Toronto back in 2024.
Highlights Amanda Anisimova vs Emma Navarro – Toronto 11-August-2024
Emma Navarro
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 17-12 | 11-7 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 54-24 | 33-14 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 64-24 | 17-9 | 37-11 | 3-1 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 31-18 | 8-8 | 23-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 19-13 | 6-6 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 11, the American reached the quarter after beating Unknown Player bye, Hailey Baptiste 6-4 6-3 and Ashlyn Krueger 4-6 6-4 6-2.
In the 3rd round against Krueger, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-2). During the match, Navarro scored 93 points vs Krueger’s 73. Emma was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about the service games, Navarro managed to score 2 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Emma Navarro lost the serve 5 times and she saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Navarro put 51% of her first serves in, winning 67% (28/42) of the points behind her 1st serve and 51% (21/41) on the 2nd serve. Emma broke Krueger 7 times after converting 58% of her break points (7/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Navarro has dropped 1 set in this tournament to conquer 55% of the points she played.
Navarro has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 65% of her matches (216-118). 2-0 on clay in 2025. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this competition, Navarro has an overall112-52 record in the last 9 years on clay.
Her best result of the season was winning the title in Merida where she beat Emiliana Arango in the final 6-0 6-0.
Emma has an overall 13-7 win-loss record in 2025, 2-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Charleston
Amanda Anisimova
14 - 5win/loss
16
16
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 17-9 | 11-5 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 21-13 | 17-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 3-8 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 33-14 | 14-8 | 13-4 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 18-16 | 12-8 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 16 (career-high), Amanda got to the quarter after beating Unknown Player bye, Veronika Kudermetova 6-2 6-2 and Yulia Putintseva 6-4 6-4.
In the 3rd round, The American had a good straight sets win against Putintseva (6-4 6-4). During the match Anisimova scored 62 points vs Putintseva’s 48. The American was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Anisimova bagged 4 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Amanda Anisimova was quite effective on serve to win 78% (29/37) of her 1st serve and 57% (8/14) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. Anisimova broke Putintseva 3 times after converting 75% of her break points (3/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 58% of the points she played.
Her best result of the season was winning the title in Doha where she defeated Jelena Ostapenko in the final 6-4 6-3.
The American has an aggregate 13-5 win-loss record in 2025, 2-0 on clay (See FULL STATS)
.Previously in Charleston
Previously, her best result was reaching the semifinal in 2022. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Navarro | Anisimova |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 5 | 4 |
Tot Games | 47 | 36 |
Pts | 161-132 | 121-89 |
Total Points | 293 | 210 |
Winners | 58 | 56 |
%Winners | 36% | 46% |
Both Navarro and Anisimova played 2 matches. At the moment, Emma Navarro surrendered 1 set while Amanda Anisimova hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Navarro has played 1 set more than Anisimova (5 vs 4). Therefore, Navarro played 11 games more than Anisimova. Emma scored 58 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, The American bagged 56 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Navarro | Anisimova |
---|---|---|
Aces | 4 | 6 |
Avg per match | 2 | 3 |
1st in | 87/153 | 74/105 |
%1st in | 57% | 70% |
1st pts | 58/87 | 56/74 |
%1st pts | 67% | 76% |
2nd pts | 36/66 | 19/31 |
%2nd pts | 55% | 61% |
Navarro fired 4 aces (2 per match). Anisimova made 6 aces (3 per match). Navarro won 67% points behind her first serve. She extremely effective on her second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Anisimova won 76% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Navarro | Anisimova |
---|---|---|
Won | 10 | 7 |
Converted | 10/19 | 7/12 |
% Converted | 53% | 58% |
Conceded | 26 | 5 |
Saved | 20 | 4 |
% Saved | 77% | 80% |
Times Broken | 6 | 1 |
Navarro broke her opponents 10 times with a 53% conversion rate. Emma conceded her serve 6 times and she saved 77% of the break points that she conceded. Anisimova broke her opponents 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. Anisimova conceded her serve once and she saved 80% of the break points that she conceded.
Navarro | ||||
R2 Baptiste | R3 Krueger | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-3 | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 28 | 47 | |
pts | 68-59 | 93-73 | 161-132 | |
Total points | 127 | 166 | 293 | |
Winners | 30 | 28 | 58 | |
%Winners | 44% | 30% | 36% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
1st in | 45/70 | 42/83 | 87/153 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 51% | 57% | |
1st pts | 30/45 | 28/42 | 58/87 | |
% 1st pts | 67% | 67% | 67% | |
2nd pts | 15/25 | 21/41 | 36/66 | |
% 2nd pts | 60% | 51% | 55% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 3 | 7 | 10 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 7/12 | 10/19 | |
Converted % | 43% | 58% | 53% | |
Conceded | 13 | 13 | 26 | |
Saved | 12/13 | 8/13 | 20 | |
Saved % | 92% | 62% | 77% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Anisimova | ||||
R2 Kudermetova | R3 Putintseva | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-2 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 20 | 36 | |
pts | 59-41 | 62-48 | 121-89 | |
Total points | 100 | 110 | 210 | |
Winners | 27 | 29 | 56 | |
%Winners | 46% | 47% | 46% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
1st in | 37/54 | 37/51 | 74/105 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 73% | 70% | |
1st pts | 27/37 | 29/37 | 56/74 | |
% 1st pts | 73% | 78% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 11/17 | 8/14 | 19/31 | |
% 2nd pts | 65% | 57% | 61% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
Converted | 4/8 | 3/4 | 7/12 | |
Converted % | 50% | 75% | 58% | |
Conceded | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
Saved | 4/4 | 0/1 | 4 | |
Saved % | 100% | 0% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Tennis Scores in Charleston
- Koray KirciKirci – Jean ThirouinThirouin (6-4 7-62) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Matias ZukasZukas (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Christopher HeymanHeyman – Denys KlokKlok (6-1 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Danielle Rose CollinsRose Collins (5-0) – H2H and prediction
- Qinwen ZhengZheng – Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova – Emma NavarroNavarro (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sofia KeninKenin – Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya (0-0) – H2H and prediction