Danielle Rose Collins and Jelena Ostapenko will square off in the 3rd round of the Credit One Charleston Open for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 12:30 pm on ALTHEA GIBSON. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Danielle Rose Collins who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Danielle Rose Collins is the pick to win this match.
Danielle Rose Collins -> 1.69
Jelena Ostapenko -> 2.17
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Danielle Rose Collins vs. Jelena Ostapenko
This will be the 4th time that Danielle Rose Collins and Jelena Ostapenko square off. The head to head is 2-1 for Ostapenko (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Collins won 2-6 6-3 6-4 in the 2nd round in San Diego back in 2023.
Highlights Danielle Rose Collins vs Jelena Ostapenko – San Diego 13-September-2023
Danielle Rose Collins
7 - 4win/loss
32
7
LWWLWWLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 7-5 | 5-4 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 42-17 | 20-10 | 19-5 | 0-1 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-18 | 19-15 | 0-2 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-12 | 17-6 | 3-4 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-15 | 23-10 | 11-3 | 5-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 22, Collins reached the 3rd round after beating Unknown Player bye and Robin Montgomery 6-3 6-1.
In the 2nd round, Collins had a good straight sets win against Montgomery (6-3 6-1). During the match, Collins scored 62 points vs Montgomery’s 42. Danielle was extremely aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Collins recorded 5 aces and she was pretty solid in conceding no double faults. Danielle Rose Collins was exceptionally effective on serve to win 80% (24/30) of her 1st serve and 56% (9/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Danielle broke Montgomery 4 times after converting 44% of her break points (4/9).
Collins has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 64% of her matches (261-150). 1-0 on clay in 2025. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Collins has a composed 69-33 match record in the last years on clay.
Danielle has an aggregate 6-4 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Charleston
Jelena Ostapenko
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 11-9 | 6-8 | 5-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-19 | 14-10 | 8-6 | 4-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-22 | 21-15 | 7-4 | 1-1 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-19 | 19-10 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-19 | 12-9 | 5-4 | 7-4 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 25, Jelena got to the 3rd round after beating Unknown Player bye and Louisa Chirico 7-5 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Ostapenko had a good straight sets win against Chirico (7-5 6-2). During the match Ostapenko scored 75 points vs Chirico’s 58. Jelena was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Ostapenko bagged 5 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Jelena Ostapenko lost the serve 3 times and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Ostapenko put 74% of her first serves in, winning 67% (33/49) of the points behind her 1st serve and 29% (5/17) on the 2nd serve. Ostapenko broke Chirico 6 times after converting 67% of her break points (6/9).
Ostapenko’s best result of the season was reaching the final in Doha.
Ostapenko has an aggregate 7-8 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Charleston
Previously, her best result was reaching the final in 2017. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Collins | Ostapenko |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 20 |
| Pts | 62-42 | 75-58 |
| Total Points | 104 | 133 |
| Winners | 24 | 33 |
| %Winners | 39% | 44% |
Both Collins and Ostapenko played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Collins and Ostapenko have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Collins played 4 games less than Ostapenko. Danielle scored 24 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Latvian bagged 33 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Collins | Ostapenko |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 5 |
| 1st in | 30/46 | 49/66 |
| %1st in | 65% | 74% |
| 1st pts | 24/30 | 33/49 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 9/16 | 5/17 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 29% |
Collins struck 5 aces . Ostapenko recorded 5 aces . Collins won 80% points on her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Ostapenko won 67% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 29% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Collins | Ostapenko |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 6 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 6/9 |
| % Converted | 44% | 67% |
| Conceded | 0 | 5 |
| Saved | 0 | 2 |
| % Saved | 0% | 40% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Danielle broke her opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Danielle pretty solid on her serve as she has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. Ostapenko broke her opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Latvian conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 40% of the break points that she conceded.
| Collins | |||
| R2 Montgomery |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 62-42 | 62-42 | |
| Total points | 104 | 104 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 30/46 | 30/46 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 24/30 | 24/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/16 | 9/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Ostapenko | |||
| R2 Chirico |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 75-58 | 75-58 | |
| Total points | 133 | 133 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 49/66 | 49/66 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 33/49 | 33/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/17 | 5/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 29% | 29% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWLWLW
WWWWLWLLLL Tennis Scores in Charleston
- Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova – Ann LiLi (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Iryna ShymanovichShymanovich (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Diana ShnaiderShnaider – Polina KudermetovaKudermetova (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Qinwen ZhengZheng – Maria SakkariSakkari (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Emma NavarroNavarro – Hailey BaptisteBaptiste (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva – Shuai ZhangZhang (7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko – Louisa ChiricoChirico (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic – Peyton StearnsStearns (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Sofia KeninKenin – Belinda BencicBencic (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Elise MertensMertens – Varvara GrachevaGracheva (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya – Caty McNallyMcNally (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Ashlyn KruegerKrueger – Katie VolynetsVolynets (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Daria KasatkinaKasatkina – Lauren DavisDavis (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Danielle Rose CollinsRose Collins – Robin MontgomeryMontgomery (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova – Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Madison KeysKeys – Caroline DolehideDolehide (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Koray KirciKirci – Mirko CutuliCutuli (6-1 3-6 7-61) – See score progression
- Jean ThirouinThirouin – Dimitriy VoroninVoronin (5-7 6-3 1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Denys KlokKlok – Alexander OvcharovOvcharov (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Vladimir KorolevKorolev (4-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Matias ZukasZukas – Zakhar TrapeznikovTrapeznikov (6-0 6-0) – See score progression
- Christopher HeymanHeyman – Shinnosuke HiramatsuHiramatsu (6-74 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Iryna ShymanovichShymanovich (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic – Peyton StearnsStearns (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Qinwen ZhengZheng – Maria SakkariSakkari (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Elise MertensMertens – Varvara GrachevaGracheva (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva – Shuai ZhangZhang (7-6(5) 6-1) – See score progression
- Ashlyn KruegerKrueger – Katie VolynetsVolynets (6-3 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Sofia KeninKenin – Belinda BencicBencic (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko – Danielle Rose CollinsRose Collins (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Qinwen ZhengZheng – Elise MertensMertens (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Darya KasatkinaKasatkina – Sofia KeninKenin (3-3) – H2H and prediction
- Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya – Madison KeysKeys (0-1) – H2H and prediction
