Kamil Majchrzak and Sumit Nagal will square off in the qualifications of the Grand Prix Hassan II for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 4. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kamil Majchrzak who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kamil Majchrzak is the pick to win this match.
Kamil Majchrzak -> 1.42
Sumit Nagal -> 2.69
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Kamil Majchrzak vs. Sumit Nagal
This will be the 3rd time that Kamil Majchrzak and Sumit Nagal square off. The head to head is 1-1 (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they fought against each other, Majchrzak won 6-2 6-0 in the qualifications in at the Wimbledon back in 2018.
Kamil Majchrzak
11 - 5win/loss
120
75
WLWWLWWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 11-5 | 8-3 | 1-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 63-19 | 26-6 | 34-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-22 | 19-10 | 4-6 | 4-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-21 | 4-4 | 16-9 | 5-5 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 120, the Pole got to the qualifications after defeating Marco Trungelliti 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, Majchrzak had a good straight sets win against Trungelliti (6-4 6-3). During the match, Majchrzak scored 67 points vs Trungelliti’s 52. Kamil was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Majchrzak bagged 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Kamil Majchrzak was quite effective on serve to win 74% (26/35) of his 1st serve and 52% (16/31) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Majchrzak broke Trungelliti 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Majchrzak has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (332-188). 1-0 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Majchrzak has an aggregate 162-87 record in the last years on clay.
Kamil’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the San Diego Challenger.
Kamil has a compiled 11-5 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Marrakech
Sumit Nagal
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 6-8 | 2-3 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 32-29 | 15-13 | 16-11 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 139, Sumit got to the qualifications after defeating Amine Jamji 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, Sumit had a good straight sets win against Jamji (6-2 6-2). During the match Nagal scored 67 points vs Jamji’s 43. The Indian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 24 winners.
About the serving games, Nagal scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Sumit Nagal was exceptionally effective on serve to win 75% (24/32) of his 1st serve and 67% (12/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Indian broke Jamji 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
The Indian has a compiled 6-8 win-loss record in 2025, 4-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Marrakech
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Majchrzak | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 16 |
| Pts | 67-52 | 67-43 |
| Total Points | 119 | 110 |
| Winners | 26 | 24 |
| %Winners | 39% | 36% |
Both Majchrzak and Nagal played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Majchrzak and Nagal have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Majchrzak played 3 games more than Nagal. Majchrzak scored 26 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Indian managed to score 24 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Majchrzak | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 1 |
| 1st in | 35/66 | 32/50 |
| %1st in | 53% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 26/35 | 24/32 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 16/31 | 12/18 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 67% |
Majchrzak managed to score 5 aces . Nagal blasted 1 ace . Majchrzak won 74% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Nagal won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Majchrzak | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 80% | 50% |
| Conceded | 6 | 4 |
| Saved | 4 | 4 |
| % Saved | 67% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Kamil broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Majchrzak lost his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Nagal broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Sumit was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 4 break points.
| Majchrzak | |||
| Q1 Trungelliti |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 67-52 | 67-52 | |
| Total points | 119 | 119 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 35/66 | 35/66 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 26/35 | 26/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/31 | 16/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Nagal | |||
| Q1 Jamji |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 67-43 | 67-43 | |
| Total points | 110 | 110 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 32/50 | 32/50 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 24/32 | 24/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/18 | 12/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWWLWWWLL
WLWLLLWLWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Fabio FogniniFognini – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta – Younes Lalami LaaroussiLalami Laaroussi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Calvin HemeryHemery (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Taha BaadiBaadi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Hugo DellienDellien (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Sumit NagalNagal (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elliot BenchetritBenchetrit – Jesper De JongDe Jong (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Borna GojoGojo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Titouan DroguetDroguet (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (0-1) – H2H and prediction
