Mitchell Krueger and Patrick Zahraj will face off in the qualifications of the US Men’s Clay Court Championship for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 12:30 pm on COURT 3. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mitchell Krueger who should win in 2 sets.
Mitchell Krueger -> 1.39
Patrick Zahraj -> 2.81
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Mitchell Krueger vs. Patrick Zahraj
There is no head to head record between Mitchell Krueger and Patrick Zahraj since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Mitchell Krueger
7 - 8win/loss
141
135
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 7-8 | 5-7 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 42-31 | 30-17 | 9-7 | 2-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 29-29 | 15-19 | 4-4 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 29-28 | 18-15 | 6-5 | 1-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 29-24 | 19-12 | 5-5 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 141, the American reached the qualifications after defeating Toby Alex Kodat 5-7 3-1 ret..
In the qualifications against Alex Kodat, the American had a free pass after Alex Kodat retired on a 5-7 3-1 . scoreline.
Krueger has winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 51% of his matches (270-263). 1-0 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Krueger has an aggregate 43-49 match record in the last years on clay.
Krueger has an aggregate 6-8 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Houston
Patrick Zahraj
18 - 10win/loss
285
285
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 18-10 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 17-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 42-31 | 9-5 | 17-15 | 14-9 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
2023 | 28-16 | 4-3 | 15-10 | 7-2 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2022 | 10-7 | 0-1 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 289 (career-high), Patrick got to the qualifications after beating Felix Corwin 6-4 7-5.
In the qualifications, Patrick had a good straight sets win against Corwin (6-4 7-5). During the match Zahraj scored 71 points vs Corwin’s 66. The German was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
About the serving games, Zahraj struck 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Patrick Zahraj lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Zahraj put 65% of his first serves in, winning 67% (34/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (11/27) on the 2nd serve. The German was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Corwin 5 times.
Zahraj’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Pau Challenger.
Patrick has a compiled 18-9 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Houston
Zahraj has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Krueger | Zahraj |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 16 | 22 |
Pts | 55-55 | 71-66 |
Total Points | 110 | 137 |
Winners | 20 | 34 |
%Winners | 36% | 48% |
Both Krueger and Zahraj played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Mitchell Krueger dropped 1 set while Patrick Zahraj hasn’t dropped a set so far. Krueger has played 1 set more than Zahraj (3 vs 2). However, it’s interesting to notice that Krueger played 6 games less than Zahraj. The American scored 20 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Patrick made 34 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Krueger | Zahraj |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 3 |
Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
1st in | 25/48 | 51/78 |
%1st in | 52% | 65% |
1st pts | 20/25 | 34/51 |
%1st pts | 80% | 67% |
2nd pts | 11/23 | 11/27 |
%2nd pts | 48% | 41% |
Krueger struck 3 aces . Zahraj blasted 3 aces . Krueger won 80% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Zahraj won 67% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 41% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Krueger | Zahraj |
---|---|---|
Won | 1 | 5 |
Converted | 1/3 | 5/5 |
% Converted | 33% | 100% |
Conceded | 3 | 8 |
Saved | 2 | 5 |
% Saved | 67% | 63% |
Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Mitchell broke his opponent once with a 33% conversion rate. Mitchell surrendered his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Zahraj broke his opponent 5 times with a 100% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
Krueger | |||
Q1 Alex | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 5-7 3-1 ret. | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 55-55 | 55-55 | |
Total points | 110 | 110 | |
Winners | 20 | 20 | |
%Winners | 36% | 36% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 25/48 | 25/48 | |
% 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
1st pts | 20/25 | 20/25 | |
% 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
2nd pts | 11/23 | 11/23 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 1 | 1 | |
Converted | 1/3 | 1/3 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Zahraj | |||
Q1 Corwin | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
pts | 71-66 | 71-66 | |
Total points | 137 | 137 | |
Winners | 34 | 34 | |
%Winners | 48% | 48% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 51/78 | 51/78 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
1st pts | 34/51 | 34/51 | |
% 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
2nd pts | 11/27 | 11/27 | |
% 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/5 | 5/5 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Corentin DenollyDenolly (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian GarinGarin – Alexander RitschardRitschard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Adam WaltonWalton (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Christopher EubanksEubanks (2-0) – H2H and prediction