Iryna Shymanovich and Elvina Kalieva will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Credit One Charleston Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 1:30 pm on ALTHEA GIBSON. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Iryna Shymanovich who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Iryna Shymanovich is the pick to win this match.
Iryna Shymanovich -> 1.59
Elvina Kalieva -> 2.24
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Iryna Shymanovich vs. Elvina Kalieva
This will be the 2nd time that Iryna Shymanovich and Elvina Kalieva clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Shymanovich (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Shymanovich won 6-3 6-2 in the qualifications in the Stanford back in 2023.
Iryna Shymanovich
13 - 6win/loss
168
154
LWWLWWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 26-10 | 7-5 | 19-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 32-29 | 18-12 | 12-13 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-25 | 16-11 | 14-6 | 4-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-14 | 3-4 | 25-8 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-14 | 14-4 | 10-6 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 231, Shymanovich got to the qualifications after defeating Lyudmyla Kichenok 6-2 0-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Belarussian defeated Kichenok (6-2 0-6 6-3).During the match, Shymanovich scored less points (2) than Kichenok. In fact, the world no. 231 won 72 points vs Kichenok’s. That means that Shymanovich was more focused during the important points. Shymanovich was exceptionally aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Regarding the service games, Shymanovich couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 4 double faults. Iryna Shymanovich lost the serve 4 times and she saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Shymanovich put 46% of her first serves in, winning 63% (19/30) of the points behind her 1st serve and 46% (16/35) on the 2nd serve. Shymanovich broke Kichenok 5 times after converting 56% of her break points (5/9).
Shymanovich has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 65% of her matches (215-114). 5-1 on clay in 2025. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Shymanovich has an aggregate 102-45 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Shymanovich’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the W50 Vacaria.
Iryna has a composed 12-6 win-loss record in 2025, 5-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Charleston
The Belarussian has never competed in this tournament before.
Elvina Kalieva
8 - 10win/loss
256
168
LWLWWWLLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 15-15 | 0-2 | 8-6 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 5-2 |
| 2024 | 31-36 | 11-16 | 15-15 | 4-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-31 | 10-14 | 29-15 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-27 | 16-17 | 13-7 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 20-17 | 13-8 | 6-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 281, Elvina got to the qualifications after beating Hao-Ching Chan 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, Elvina had a good straight sets win against Chan (6-2 6-1). During the match Kalieva scored 66 points vs Chan’s 38. Elvina was very aggressive to blast 18 winners.
About the serving games, Kalieva struck 6 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Elvina Kalieva was pretty effective on serve to win 72% (18/25) of her 1st serve and 59% (13/22) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. Kalieva broke Chan 6 times after converting 75% of her break points (6/8).
The American’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in the W35 Herrenschwanden.
Elvina has a compiled 8-9 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Shymanovich | Kalieva |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 15 |
| Pts | 72-74 | 66-38 |
| Total Points | 146 | 104 |
| Winners | 19 | 18 |
| %Winners | 26% | 27% |
Both Shymanovich and Kalieva played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Iryna Shymanovich lost 1 set while Elvina Kalieva hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Shymanovich has played 1 set more than Kalieva (3 vs 2). Therefore, Shymanovich played 8 games more than Kalieva. Iryna scored 19 winners (26% of the total points). On the other side, The American made 18 winners (27%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Shymanovich | Kalieva |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 6 |
| 1st in | 30/65 | 25/47 |
| %1st in | 46% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 19/30 | 18/25 |
| %1st pts | 63% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 16/35 | 13/22 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 59% |
Shymanovich didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Kalieva blasted 6 aces . Shymanovich won 63% points on her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Kalieva won 72% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Shymanovich | Kalieva |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 6 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 6/8 |
| % Converted | 56% | 75% |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 |
| Saved | 1 | 4 |
| % Saved | 20% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 |
Iryna broke her opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Iryna lost her serve 4 times and she saved 20% of the break points that she conceded. Kalieva broke her opponent 6 times with a 75% conversion rate. Elvina conceded her serve once and she saved 80% of the break points that she conceded.
| Shymanovich | |||
| Q1 Kichenok |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 0-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 72-74 | 72-74 | |
| Total points | 146 | 146 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 26% | 26% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 30/65 | 30/65 | |
| % 1st in | 46% | 46% | |
| 1st pts | 19/30 | 19/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/35 | 16/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 1/5 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 20% | 20% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Kalieva | |||
| Q1 Chan |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 66-38 | 66-38 | |
| Total points | 104 | 104 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 27% | 27% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 25/47 | 25/47 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 18/25 | 18/25 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/22 | 13/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 6/8 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWWWWW
LWLWWWLLWW Tennis Scores in Charleston
- Kuzey CekirgeCekirge – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Michalis SakellaridisSakellaridis – Mislav BosnjakBosnjak (6-3 2-6 10-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Niklas GuttauGuttau – Daniil GusevGusev (6-1 3-0 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Zura TkemaladzeTkemaladze – Mert AlkayaAlkaya (6-4 2-6 10-8) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Viacheslav YulikYulik – Ilya RudiukovRudiukov (6-0 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Eri HozumiHozumi – Jamie LoebLoeb (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Louisa ChiricoChirico – Kajsa Rinaldo PerssonRinaldo Persson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shuai ZhangZhang – Bethanie Mattek-SandsMattek-Sands (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kyoka OkamuraOkamura – Katherine SebovSebov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Caty McNallyMcNally – Claire LiuLiu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Iryna ShymanovichShymanovich – Elvina KalievaKalieva (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Belinda BencicBencic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktoriya TomovaTomova – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maria SakkariSakkari – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – Varvara GrachevaGracheva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ann LiLi – Anna BlinkovaBlinkova (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Maria MateasMateas – Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olivia GadeckiGadecki – Hailey BaptisteBaptiste (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sofia KeninKenin – Bernarda PeraPera (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Caroline DolehideDolehide – Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto (0-0) – H2H and prediction
