Kyoka Okamura and Katherine Sebov will play each other in the qualifications of the Credit One Charleston Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 11:00 am on ALTHEA GIBSON. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Katherine Sebov who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Katherine Sebov is the pick to win this match.
Katherine Sebov -> 1.49
Kyoka Okamura -> 2.48
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Kyoka Okamura vs. Katherine Sebov
There is no head to head record between Kyoka Okamura and Katherine Sebov since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Kyoka Okamura
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 5-9 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 49-34 | 46-32 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
| 2023 | 34-30 | 26-24 | 0-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 2022 | 31-27 | 24-21 | 0-2 | 5-2 | 0-1 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 12-24 | 6-13 | 6-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 182, the Japanese reached the qualifications after beating Anna Dvorackova 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, Okamura had a good straight sets win against Dvorackova (6-2 6-2). During the match, Okamura scored 72 points vs Dvorackova’s 47. Kyoka was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Okamura fired 2 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Kyoka Okamura lost the serve once and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Okamura put 66% of her first serves in, winning 81% (30/37) of the points behind her 1st serve and 37% (7/19) on the 2nd serve. Okamura broke Dvorackova 5 times after converting 56% of her break points (5/9).
Okamura has positive win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 53% of her matches (271-238). 1-0 on clay in 2025. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, Okamura has a compiled 20-23 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Kyoka has a compiled 5-6 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Charleston
Okamura has never competed in this tournament before.
Katherine Sebov
14 - 4win/loss
302
136
LWWLLLWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 14-5 | 3-3 | 11-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 24-21 | 17-11 | 2-6 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-17 | 12-8 | 4-4 | 13-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-21 | 38-19 | 0-0 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 10-18 | 7-10 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 330, Sebov got to the qualifications after beating Gabriela Lee 6-0 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Canadian had a good straight sets win against Talaba (6-0 6-4). During the match Sebov scored 67 points vs Talaba’s 47. The Canadian was pretty aggressive to blast 24 winners.
About the serving games, Sebov wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Katherine Sebov lost the serve once and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Sebov put 82% of her first serves in, winning 60% (24/40) of the points behind her 1st serve and 89% (8/9) on the 2nd serve. The Canadian broke Talaba 5 times after converting 45% of her break points (5/11).
Her best result of the current season was winning the title the W35 Naples where she beat Jessica Pieri in the final 6-2 6-0.
Sebov has a composed 13-4 win-loss record in 2025, 10-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Charleston
Previously, her best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2023. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Okamura | Sebov |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 |
| Pts | 72-47 | 67-47 |
| Total Points | 119 | 114 |
| Winners | 30 | 24 |
| %Winners | 42% | 36% |
Both Okamura and Sebov played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Okamura and Sebov have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (16). Kyoka scored 30 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The Canadian scored 24 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Okamura | Sebov |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 0 |
| 1st in | 37/56 | 40/49 |
| %1st in | 66% | 82% |
| 1st pts | 30/37 | 24/40 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 60% |
| 2nd pts | 7/19 | 8/9 |
| %2nd pts | 37% | 89% |
Okamura recorded 2 aces . Sebov didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Okamura won 81% points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 37% of the points. On the other side, Sebov won 60% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 89% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Okamura | Sebov |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/11 |
| % Converted | 56% | 45% |
| Conceded | 5 | 3 |
| Saved | 4 | 2 |
| % Saved | 80% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Kyoka broke her opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. The Japanese conceded her serve once and she saved 80% of the break points that she conceded. The Canadian broke her opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Katherine conceded her serve once and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded.
| Okamura | |||
| Q1 Dvorackova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 72-47 | 72-47 | |
| Total points | 119 | 119 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 37/56 | 37/56 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 30/37 | 30/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/19 | 7/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 37% | 37% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Sebov | |||
| Q1 Talaba |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 67-47 | 67-47 | |
| Total points | 114 | 114 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 40/49 | 40/49 | |
| % 1st in | 82% | 82% | |
| 1st pts | 24/40 | 24/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 60% | 60% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/9 | 8/9 | |
| % 2nd pts | 89% | 89% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLWWLWL
LWWLLLWWWL Tennis Scores in Charleston
- Zura TkemaladzeTkemaladze – Mert AlkayaAlkaya (6-4 2-6 10-8) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Viacheslav YulikYulik – Ilya RudiukovRudiukov (6-0 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Kuzey CekirgeCekirge – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Michalis SakellaridisSakellaridis – Mislav BosnjakBosnjak (6-3 2-6 10-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Niklas GuttauGuttau – Daniil GusevGusev (6-1 3-0 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Eri HozumiHozumi – Jamie LoebLoeb (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Louisa ChiricoChirico – Kajsa Rinaldo PerssonRinaldo Persson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shuai ZhangZhang – Bethanie Mattek-SandsMattek-Sands (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kyoka OkamuraOkamura – Katherine SebovSebov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Caty McNallyMcNally – Claire LiuLiu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Iryna ShymanovichShymanovich – Elvina KalievaKalieva (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Belinda BencicBencic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktoriya TomovaTomova – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maria SakkariSakkari – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – Varvara GrachevaGracheva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ann LiLi – Anna BlinkovaBlinkova (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Maria MateasMateas – Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olivia GadeckiGadecki – Hailey BaptisteBaptiste (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sofia KeninKenin – Bernarda PeraPera (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Caroline DolehideDolehide – Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto (0-0) – H2H and prediction
