Louisa Chirico and Kajsa Rinaldo Persson will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Credit One Charleston Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 11:00 am on CREDIT ONE STADIUM. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Louisa Chirico who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Louisa Chirico is the pick to win this match.
Louisa Chirico -> 1.41
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson -> 2.73
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Louisa Chirico vs. Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
There is no head to head record between Louisa Chirico and Kajsa Rinaldo Persson since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Louisa Chirico
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 11-15 | 1-5 | 7-8 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 38-31 | 3-8 | 28-19 | 7-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-29 | 8-10 | 19-15 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-21 | 15-11 | 16-7 | 0-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 13-12 | 7-6 | 3-5 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 164, Chirico reached the qualifications after beating Ana Konjuh 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Louisa had a good straight sets win against Konjuh (6-4 6-4). During the match, Chirico scored 75 points vs Konjuh’s 64. Chirico was pretty aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, Chirico bagged 2 aces and she committed only 5 double faults. Louisa Chirico lost the serve twice and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Chirico put 55% of her first serves in, winning 75% (27/36) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (15/30) on the 2nd serve. Louisa broke Konjuh 4 times after converting 31% of her break points (4/13).
Chirico has favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 53% of her matches (209-188). 2-1 on clay in 2025. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this competition, Chirico has an aggregate 115-80 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
The American’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the W75 Porto.
The American has a compiled 6-8 win-loss record in 2025, 2-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Charleston
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 7-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 36-69 | 0-0 | 30-62 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-21 | 0-0 | 17-14 | 16-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-18 | 1-1 | 31-14 | 9-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 13-11 | 1-2 | 12-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 306, the Swede reached the qualifications after defeating Fernanda Contreras Gomez 6-1 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Swede had a good straight sets win against Contreras Gomez (6-1 6-2). During the match Rinaldo Persson scored 58 points vs Contreras Gomez’s 35. The Swede was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Rinaldo Persson wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 2 double faults. Kajsa Rinaldo Persson conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 1 break points. Furthermore, Rinaldo Persson put 77% of her first serves in, winning 68% (23/34) of the points behind her 1st serve and 80% (8/10) on the 2nd serve. The Swede broke Contreras Gomez 5 times after converting 45% of her break points (5/11).
Kajsa has an aggregate 7-3 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Charleston
Rinaldo Persson has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Chirico | Rinaldo Persson |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 15 |
| Pts | 75-64 | 58-35 |
| Total Points | 139 | 93 |
| Winners | 27 | 23 |
| %Winners | 36% | 40% |
Both Chirico and Rinaldo Persson played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Chirico and Rinaldo Persson have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Chirico played 5 games more than Rinaldo Persson. Chirico scored 27 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Rinaldo Persson bagged 23 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Chirico | Rinaldo Persson |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 0 |
| 1st in | 36/66 | 34/44 |
| %1st in | 55% | 77% |
| 1st pts | 27/36 | 23/34 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 15/30 | 8/10 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 80% |
Chirico made 2 aces . Rinaldo Persson didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Chirico won 75% points behind her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Rinaldo Persson won 68% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 80% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Chirico | Rinaldo Persson |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/13 | 5/11 |
| % Converted | 31% | 45% |
| Conceded | 7 | 1 |
| Saved | 5 | 1 |
| % Saved | 71% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Louisa broke her opponent 4 times with a 31% conversion rate. Chirico conceded her serve twice and she saved 71% of the break points that she conceded. The Swede broke her opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Kajsa was rock solid on her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Chirico | |||
| Q1 Konjuh |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 75-64 | 75-64 | |
| Total points | 139 | 139 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 36/66 | 36/66 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 27/36 | 27/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/30 | 15/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/13 | 4/13 | |
| Converted % | 31% | 31% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Rinaldo Persson | |||
| Q1 Contreras Gomez |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 58-35 | 58-35 | |
| Total points | 93 | 93 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 34/44 | 34/44 | |
| % 1st in | 77% | 77% | |
| 1st pts | 23/34 | 23/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/10 | 8/10 | |
| % 2nd pts | 80% | 80% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLLWWLL
LWWWWLWLLL Tennis Scores in Charleston
- Niklas GuttauGuttau – Daniil GusevGusev (6-1 3-0 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Zura TkemaladzeTkemaladze – Mert AlkayaAlkaya (6-4 2-6 10-8) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Viacheslav YulikYulik – Ilya RudiukovRudiukov (6-0 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Kuzey CekirgeCekirge – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Michalis SakellaridisSakellaridis – Mislav BosnjakBosnjak (6-3 2-6 10-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Eri HozumiHozumi – Jamie LoebLoeb (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Louisa ChiricoChirico – Kajsa Rinaldo PerssonRinaldo Persson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shuai ZhangZhang – Bethanie Mattek-SandsMattek-Sands (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kyoka OkamuraOkamura – Katherine SebovSebov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Caty McNallyMcNally – Claire LiuLiu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Iryna ShymanovichShymanovich – Elvina KalievaKalieva (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Belinda BencicBencic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktoriya TomovaTomova – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maria SakkariSakkari – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – Varvara GrachevaGracheva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ann LiLi – Anna BlinkovaBlinkova (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Maria MateasMateas – Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olivia GadeckiGadecki – Hailey BaptisteBaptiste (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sofia KeninKenin – Bernarda PeraPera (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Caroline DolehideDolehide – Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto (0-0) – H2H and prediction
