Martin Klizan and Franco Agamenone will square off in the qualifications of the Naples Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on CAMPO D’AVALOS. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Franco Agamenone who should win in 3 sets.
Franco Agamenone -> 1.64
Martin Klizan -> 2.15
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Martin Klizan vs. Franco Agamenone
There is no head to head record between Martin Klizan and Franco Agamenone since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Martin Klizan
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 7-9 | 3-4 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 52-22 | 15-4 | 35-14 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 9-14 | 0-1 | 6-7 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 296, Klizan reached the qualifications after beating Marco Cecchinato 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, Martin had a good straight sets win against Cecchinato (6-3 6-3). During the match, Klizan scored 59 points vs Cecchinato’s 43. Martin was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about the service games, Klizan fired 2 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults. Martin Klizan lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Klizan put 59% of his first serves in, winning 77% (23/30) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (9/21) on the 2nd serve. The Slovakian broke Cecchinato 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Klizan has favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (188-138). 1-1 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Klizan has an aggregate 120-69 match record in the last years on clay.
Klizan has a composed 4-5 win-loss record in 2025, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS)
.Previously in the Naples Challenger
Klizan has never competed in this tournament before.
Franco Agamenone
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 15-10 | 0-0 | 15-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 30-32 | 1-4 | 28-24 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 24-29 | 0-3 | 24-24 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 35-32 | 6-3 | 26-24 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 81-23 | 21-5 | 60-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 416, Agamenone reached the qualifications after beating Paul Jubb 7-6(3) 7-5.
In the qualifications, Agamenone had a good straight sets win against Jubb (7-63 7-5). During the match Agamenone scored 87 points vs Jubb’s 79. Agamenone was very aggressive to blast 34 winners.
About the serving games, Agamenone managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Franco Agamenone lost the serve 3 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Agamenone put 59% of his first serves in, winning 71% (34/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (16/34) on the 2nd serve. Agamenone broke Jubb 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
The Italian has an overall 9-5 win-loss record in 2025, 9-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Naples Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Klizan | Agamenone |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 18 | 25 |
Pts | 59-43 | 87-79 |
Total Points | 102 | 166 |
Winners | 23 | 34 |
%Winners | 39% | 39% |
Both Klizan and Agamenone played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Klizan and Agamenone have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Klizan played 7 games less than Agamenone. The Slovakian scored 23 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Italian made 34 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Klizan | Agamenone |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 3 |
Avg per match | 2 | 3 |
1st in | 30/51 | 48/82 |
%1st in | 59% | 59% |
1st pts | 23/30 | 34/48 |
%1st pts | 77% | 71% |
2nd pts | 9/21 | 16/34 |
%2nd pts | 43% | 47% |
Klizan managed to score 2 aces . Agamenone bagged 3 aces . Klizan won 77% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Agamenone won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Klizan | Agamenone |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 4 |
Converted | 5/8 | 4/9 |
% Converted | 63% | 44% |
Conceded | 2 | 10 |
Saved | 0 | 7 |
% Saved | 0% | 70% |
Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
Klizan broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Martin conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Agamenone broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Agamenone conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded.
Klizan | |||
Q1 Cecchinato | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 59-43 | 59-43 | |
Total points | 102 | 102 | |
Winners | 23 | 23 | |
%Winners | 39% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 30/51 | 30/51 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
1st pts | 23/30 | 23/30 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 9/21 | 9/21 | |
% 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Agamenone | |||
Q1 Jubb | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-63 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
pts | 87-79 | 87-79 | |
Total points | 166 | 166 | |
Winners | 34 | 34 | |
%Winners | 39% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 48/82 | 48/82 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
1st pts | 34/48 | 34/48 | |
% 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
2nd pts | 16/34 | 16/34 | |
% 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
Saved | 7/10 | 7 | |
Saved % | 70% | 70% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Fabio FogniniFognini – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Calvin HemeryHemery (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Martin KlizanKlizan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – Oleksandr OvcharenkoOvcharenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – Borna GojoGojo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Sumit NagalNagal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Borna CoricCoric (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco (0-0) – H2H and prediction