
Jesper De Jong and Harold Mayot will face off in the quarter of the Murcia Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 1:00 pm on PISTA 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jesper De Jong who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jesper De Jong is the pick to win this match.
Jesper De Jong -> 1.5
Harold Mayot -> 2.45
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jesper De Jong vs. Harold Mayot
This will be the 2nd time that Jesper De Jong and Harold Mayot fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Mayot (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on clay.
The last time that they competed against each other, Mayot won 3-6 7-5 6-4 in the quarter in the Noumea Challenger back in 2024.
Jesper De Jong
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 6-7 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 48-25 | 12-5 | 33-15 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 52-23 | 19-4 | 30-14 | 0-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 24-28 | 12-7 | 10-13 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 32-29 | 2-6 | 27-18 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 105, the Dutch got to the quarter after defeating Andrea Pellegrino 6-3 6-3 and Valentin Vacherot 6-3 3-6 7-5.
In the 2nd round, De Jong defeated Vacherot (6-3 3-6 7-5). During the match, De Jong scored 100 points vs Vacherot’s 96. The Dutch was exceptionally aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about the service games, De Jong scored 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Jesper De Jong lost the serve 5 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, De Jong put 57% of his first serves in, winning 69% (36/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (16/40) on the 2nd serve. Jesper broke Vacherot 6 times after converting 50% of his break points (6/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Dutch has conceded 1 set in this event to win 54% of the points he played.
De Jong has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 63% of his matches (259-154). 2-2 on clay in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, De Jong has a compiled147-80 win-loss record in the last 9 years on clay.
De Jong’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in Montpellier.
De Jong has an overall 6-7 win-loss record in 2025, 2-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Murcia Challenger
Harold Mayot
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 7-7 | 2-2 | 2-0 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 45-37 | 14-13 | 11-9 | 15-11 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 31-29 | 11-9 | 9-13 | 7-5 | 4-1 | 0-1 |
2022 | 40-33 | 13-8 | 19-13 | 7-11 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
2021 | 15-14 | 0-1 | 7-3 | 7-9 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 132, the French player reached the quarter after beating Edas Butvilas 6-4 4-6 7-5 and Albert Ramos-Vinolas 4-6 6-3 7-5.
In the 2nd round against Ramos-Vinolas, The French player recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 7-5).During the match Mayot scored less points (1) than Ramos-Vinolas. In fact, the world no. 105 won 109 points vs Ramos-Vinolas’s. That means that Mayot was more focused during the important points. Harold was exceptionally aggressive to blast 49 winners.
About the serving games, Mayot recorded 8 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Harold Mayot lost the serve twice and he saved 16 break points. Furthermore, Mayot put 55% of his first serves in, winning 68% (49/72) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (32/60) on the 2nd serve. Mayot broke Ramos-Vinolas 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The French player has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 51% of the points he played.
Harold has an aggregate 7-7 win-loss record in 2025, 2-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Murcia Challenger
Mayot has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | De Jong | Mayot |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 5 | 6 |
Tot Games | 48 | 63 |
Pts | 161-139 | 205-197 |
Total Points | 300 | 402 |
Winners | 60 | 85 |
%Winners | 37% | 41% |
Both De Jong and Mayot played 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Jesper De Jong lost 1 set, while Harold Mayot surrendered 2 sets. De Jong has played 1 set(s) less than Mayot (5 vs 6). Therefore, De Jong played 15 games less than Mayot. De Jong scored 60 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Harold fired 85 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
Serve | De Jong | Mayot |
---|---|---|
Aces | 11 | 10 |
Avg per match | 5.5 | 5 |
1st in | 80/141 | 124/220 |
%1st in | 57% | 56% |
1st pts | 60/80 | 85/124 |
%1st pts | 75% | 69% |
2nd pts | 30/61 | 51/96 |
%2nd pts | 49% | 53% |
De Jong recorded 11 aces (5.5 per match). Mayot made 10 aces (5 per match). De Jong won 75% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Mayot won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | De Jong | Mayot |
---|---|---|
Won | 9 | 8 |
Converted | 9/15 | 8/18 |
% Converted | 60% | 44% |
Conceded | 12 | 22 |
Saved | 7 | 16 |
% Saved | 58% | 73% |
Times Broken | 5 | 6 |
The Dutch broke his opponents 9 times with a 60% conversion rate. The Dutch surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded. Mayot broke his opponents 8 times with a 44% conversion rate. Mayot conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
De Jong | ||||
R1 Pellegrino |
R2 Vacherot |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 30 | 48 | |
pts | 61-43 | 100-96 | 161-139 | |
Total points | 104 | 196 | 300 | |
Winners | 24 | 36 | 60 | |
%Winners | 39% | 36% | 37% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 6 | 5 | 11 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
1st in | 28/49 | 52/92 | 80/141 | |
% 1st in | 57% | 57% | 57% | |
1st pts | 24/28 | 36/52 | 60/80 | |
% 1st pts | 86% | 69% | 75% | |
2nd pts | 14/21 | 16/40 | 30/61 | |
% 2nd pts | 67% | 40% | 49% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
Converted | 3/3 | 6/12 | 9/15 | |
Converted % | 100% | 50% | 60% | |
Conceded | 2 | 10 | 12 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 5/10 | 7 | |
Saved % | 100% | 50% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Mayot | ||||
R1 Butvilas |
R2 Ramos-Vinolas |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 32 | 31 | 63 | |
pts | 96-87 | 109-110 | 205-197 | |
Total points | 183 | 219 | 402 | |
Winners | 36 | 49 | 85 | |
%Winners | 38% | 45% | 41% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 2 | 8 | 10 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 9 | 9 | |
1st in | 52/88 | 72/132 | 124/220 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 55% | 56% | |
1st pts | 36/52 | 49/72 | 85/124 | |
% 1st pts | 69% | 68% | 69% | |
2nd pts | 19/36 | 32/60 | 51/96 | |
% 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | 53% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
Converted | 5/9 | 3/9 | 8/18 | |
Converted % | 56% | 33% | 44% | |
Conceded | 4 | 18 | 22 | |
Saved | 0/4 | 16/18 | 16 | |
Saved % | 0% | 89% | 45% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 2 | 6 |
Head 2 Head



Tennis Scores in Murcia Challenger
- Jesper de Jong/Mats Hermansde Jong/Mats Hermans – Alexander Donski/Bruno Pujol NavarroDonski/Bruno Pujol Navarro (7-61 3-6 10-8) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Carlos TabernerTaberner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Ivan GakhovGakhov (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Jesper De JongDe Jong (1-0) – H2H and prediction