Elmer Moller and Kimmer Coppejans will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Murcia Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 12:00 pm on PISTA 3. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Elmer Moller who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Elmer Moller is the pick to win this match.
Elmer Moller -> 1.85
Kimmer Coppejans -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Elmer Moller vs. Kimmer Coppejans
There is no head to head record between Elmer Moller and Kimmer Coppejans since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Elmer Moller
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4-8 | 0-5 | 1-1 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 62-26 | 5-3 | 52-21 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-21 | 14-11 | 31-8 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-15 | 10-5 | 12-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 13-9 | 8-4 | 2-4 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 156, Elmer reached the 2nd round after defeating Miguel Damas 4-6 7-5 6-4.
In the 1st round against Damas, Moller recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-5 6-4). During the match, Moller scored 112 points vs Damas’s 103. Moller was very aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Talking about the service games, Moller scored 2 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Elmer Moller lost the serve 7 times and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Moller put 67% of his first serves in, winning 65% (46/71) of the points behind his 1st serve and 31% (11/35) on the 2nd serve. Moller broke Damas 8 times after converting 57% of his break points (8/14).
Moller has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 66% of his matches (153-78). 1-0 on clay in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Moller has an aggregate98-40 match record in the last 6 years on clay.
The Dane has a composed 4-7 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Murcia Challenger
Elmer has never competed in this tournament before.
Kimmer Coppejans
15 - 6win/loss
325
97
LWWWLWWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 17-7 | 14-6 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 28-8 | 22-4 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-30 | 4-5 | 24-19 | 0-5 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-28 | 6-8 | 30-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-27 | 4-5 | 17-18 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 325, the Belgian got to the 2nd round after beating Sebastian Ofner 6-1 6-7(4) 6-3.
In the 1st round, Coppejans defeated Ofner (6-1 6-74 6-3). During the match Coppejans scored 119 points vs Ofner’s 95. Kimmer was exceptionally aggressive to blast 27 winners.
About the serving games, Coppejans fired 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Kimmer Coppejans lost the serve 3 times and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Coppejans put 43% of his first serves in, winning 68% (27/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 60% (31/52) on the 2nd serve. Coppejans broke Ofner 8 times after converting 47% of his break points (8/17).
Coppejans’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Nonthaburi 1 Challenger.
Kimmer has a composed 15-6 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Moller | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 32 | 29 |
| Pts | 112-103 | 119-95 |
| Total Points | 215 | 214 |
| Winners | 46 | 27 |
| %Winners | 41% | 23% |
Both Moller and Coppejans played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Elmer Moller conceded 1 set, while Kimmer Coppejans surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Moller and Coppejans have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Moller played 3 games more than Coppejans. Moller scored 46 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Coppejans bagged 27 winners (23%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Moller | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 2 |
| 1st in | 71/106 | 40/92 |
| %1st in | 67% | 43% |
| 1st pts | 46/71 | 27/40 |
| %1st pts | 65% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 11/35 | 31/52 |
| %2nd pts | 31% | 60% |
Moller scored 2 aces . Coppejans fired 2 aces . Moller won 65% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 31% of the points. On the other side, Coppejans won 68% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Moller | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 8 |
| Converted | 8/14 | 8/17 |
| % Converted | 57% | 47% |
| Conceded | 16 | 12 |
| Saved | 9 | 9 |
| % Saved | 56% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 7 | 3 |
The Dane broke his opponent 8 times with a 57% conversion rate. Moller surrendered his serve 7 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded. Coppejans broke his opponent 8 times with a 47% conversion rate. Coppejans conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Moller | |||
| R1 Damas |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 112-103 | 112-103 | |
| Total points | 215 | 215 | |
| Winners | 46 | 46 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 71/106 | 71/106 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 46/71 | 46/71 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/35 | 11/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 31% | 31% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 8 | 8 | |
| Converted | 8/14 | 8/14 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 16 | 16 | |
| Saved | 9/16 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 56% | 56% | |
| Times Broken | 7 | 7 | |
| Coppejans | |||
| R1 Ofner |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-74 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 119-95 | 119-95 | |
| Total points | 214 | 214 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 23% | 23% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 40/92 | 40/92 | |
| % 1st in | 43% | 43% | |
| 1st pts | 27/40 | 27/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 31/52 | 31/52 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 8 | 8 | |
| Converted | 8/17 | 8/17 | |
| Converted % | 47% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 9/12 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLLWLLWW
LWWWLWWLWW Tennis Scores in Murcia Challenger
- Raul Brancaccio/Andrea PellegrinoBrancaccio/Andrea Pellegrino – Daniel Cukierman/Joshua ParisCukierman/Joshua Paris (6-3 6-76 10-6) – See score progression
- Elmer MollerMoller – Miguel DamasDamas (4-6 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Justin EngelEngel (6-4 6-75 6-4) – See score progression
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio (7-63 6-76 6-3) – See score progression
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (3-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Vilius GaubasGaubas (7-5 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Nicolai Budkov KjaerBudkov Kjaer – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Daniel Merida AguilarMerida Aguilar – Marin CilicCilic (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel RinconRincon – Gabriele PennafortiPennaforti (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Sebastian OfnerOfner (6-1 6-74 6-3) – See score progression
- Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz – Sumit NagalNagal (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – Edas ButvilasButvilas (6-4 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Henrique RochaRocha (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Ugo BlanchetBlanchet (6-4 6-72 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel Merida AguilarMerida Aguilar – Marin CilicCilic (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Elmer MollerMoller – Miguel DamasDamas (4-6 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel RinconRincon – Gabriele PennafortiPennaforti (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz – Sumit NagalNagal (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Benjamin HassanHassan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Jesper De JongDe Jong (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (1-0) – H2H and prediction
