Laura Siegemund and Linda Fruhvirtova will square off in the qualifications of the Miami Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on GRANDSTAND. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Laura Siegemund who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Laura Siegemund is the pick to win this match.
Laura Siegemund -> 1.62
Linda Fruhvirtova -> 2.18
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Laura Siegemund vs. Linda Fruhvirtova
There is no head to head record between Laura Siegemund and Linda Fruhvirtova since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Laura Siegemund
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 6-7 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 28-22 | 16-11 | 11-7 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-17 | 23-13 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-15 | 3-5 | 15-7 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 14-14 | 7-7 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 84, Laura got to the qualifications after beating Ana Konjuh 6-2 6-3.
In the qualifications, Laura had a good straight sets win against Konjuh (6-2 6-3). During the match, Siegemund scored 68 points vs Konjuh’s 49. Laura was pretty aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Siegemund wasn’t able to score even 1 ace during the match and she committed only 1 double fault. Laura Siegemund lost the serve 3 times and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Siegemund put 67% of her first serves in, winning 64% (25/39) of the points behind her 1st serve and 47% (9/19) on the 2nd serve. Laura broke Konjuh 6 times after converting 46% of her break points (6/13).
Siegemund has favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 58% of her matches (231-168). 6-7 on hard in 2025. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Siegemund has a composed 94-84 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Laura has an aggregate 6-7 win-loss record in 2025, 6-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
Linda Fruhvirtova
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 8-6 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 21-31 | 11-21 | 5-5 | 1-1 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-28 | 15-19 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-18 | 20-7 | 7-7 | 1-1 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-8 | 16-4 | 3-2 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 214, Linda reached the qualifications after beating Rebecca Marino 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Marino (6-3 6-3). During the match Fruhvirtova scored 65 points vs Marino’s 52. Linda was exceptionally aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about serving, Fruhvirtova fired 2 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Linda Fruhvirtova lost the serve twice and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Fruhvirtova put 47% of her first serves in, winning 73% (19/26) of the points behind her 1st serve and 48% (14/29) on the 2nd serve. Linda broke Marino 5 times after converting 50% of her break points (5/10).
Linda’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the W100 Bengaluru.
The Czech has a composed 8-6 win-loss record in 2025, 6-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
Previously, her best result was reaching the 4th round in 2022. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Siegemund | Fruhvirtova |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 18 |
| Pts | 68-49 | 65-52 |
| Total Points | 117 | 117 |
| Winners | 25 | 19 |
| %Winners | 37% | 29% |
Both Siegemund and Fruhvirtova played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Siegemund and Fruhvirtova have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Siegemund played 1 game less than Fruhvirtova. Laura scored 25 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Fruhvirtova bagged 19 winners (29%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Siegemund | Fruhvirtova |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 2 |
| 1st in | 39/58 | 26/55 |
| %1st in | 67% | 47% |
| 1st pts | 25/39 | 19/26 |
| %1st pts | 64% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | 14/29 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 48% |
Siegemund didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Fruhvirtova blasted 2 aces . Siegemund won 64% points behind her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Fruhvirtova won 73% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Siegemund | Fruhvirtova |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 5 |
| Converted | 6/13 | 5/10 |
| % Converted | 46% | 50% |
| Conceded | 7 | 6 |
| Saved | 4 | 4 |
| % Saved | 57% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
The German broke her opponent 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. Siegemund surrendered her serve 3 times and she saved 57% of the break points that she conceded. The Czech broke her opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Czech conceded her serve twice and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded.
| Siegemund | |||
| Q1 Konjuh |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 68-49 | 68-49 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 39/58 | 39/58 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 25/39 | 25/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | 9/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/13 | 6/13 | |
| Converted % | 46% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Fruhvirtova | |||
| Q1 Marino |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 65-52 | 65-52 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 26/55 | 26/55 | |
| % 1st in | 47% | 47% | |
| 1st pts | 19/26 | 19/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/29 | 14/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WLLLWLWWLW
WLWWLLWLLW Tennis Scores in Miami
- Nicolas TepmahcTepmahc – Caspar SchuetzeSchuetze (7-5 0-6 11-9) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mauro De MaioDe Maio – Alex KnaffKnaff (7-64 2-6 10-8) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nicolas BianchiBianchi – Tommaso Carnevale-MiinoCarnevale-Miino (6-1 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yuichiro InuiInui – Ashwin Ryan SharmaRyan Sharma (6-4 4-6 10-7) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Andre Gaspar MurtaGaspar Murta – Damien WengerWenger (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Francesco LiucciLiucci – Maximiliano Roman MayorgaRoman Mayorga (6-3 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Claire LiuLiu – Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Irina-Camelia BeguBegu – Anna BondarBondar (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimberly BirrellBirrell – Harriet DartDart (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ena ShibaharaShibahara – Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eva LysLys – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ysaline BonaventureBonaventure – Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernarda PeraPera – (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Laura SiegemundSiegemund – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tatjana MariaMaria – Yulia StarodubtsewaStarodubtsewa (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktoriya TomovaTomova – Caty McNallyMcNally (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sorana CirsteaCirstea – Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Alycia ParksParks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Renata ZarazuaZarazua – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Petra KvitovaKvitova – Sofia KeninKenin (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jessica Bouzas ManeiroBouzas Maneiro – Lucia BronzettiBronzetti (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia PavlyuchenkovaPavlyuchenkova – Magda LinetteLinette (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Olga DanilovicDanilovic – Hailey BaptisteBaptiste (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yue YuanYuan – Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mccartney KesslerKessler – Marie BouzkovaBouzkova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mayar SherifSherif – Lulu SunSun (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova – Xin Yu WangYu Wang (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova – Anna BlinkovaBlinkova (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Suzan LamensLamens – Moyuka UchijimaUchijima (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Victoria AzarenkaAzarenka (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Dayana YastremskaYastremska – Belinda BencicBencic (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Katie BoulterBoulter – Peyton StearnsStearns (0-2) – H2H and prediction
