Jakub Mensik and Damir Dzumhur will fight against each other in the semifinal of the Cap Cana Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 3:30 pm on ESTADIO. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jakub Mensik who should win in 2 sets.

As per the initial odds, Jakub Mensik is the pick to win this match.
Jakub Mensik -> 1.32
Damir Dzumhur -> 3.15

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Jakub Mensik vs. Damir Dzumhur

There is no head to head record between Jakub Mensik and Damir Dzumhur since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.

Jakub Mensik

Jakub Mensik

11 - 6win/loss

Hard
10-5
I Hard
1-1
Rank
57
High
45
WWWLWLLWLW
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2025 11-6 10-5 0-0 1-1 0-0 0-0
2024 41-27 26-12 6-4 7-6 2-5 0-0
2023 37-23 10-6 17-11 10-6 0-0 0-0
2022 37-16 18-4 17-10 0-1 0-0 2-1
2021 1-4 0-0 1-4 0-0 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 57, Mensik reached the semifinal after beating Cristian Garin 6-3 6-4, Rei Sakamoto 6-4 6-2 and Tomas Martin Etcheverry 6-3 6-7(7) 6-3.

In the quarter, Mensik defeated Etcheverry (6-3 6-77 6-3). During the match, Mensik scored 109 points vs Etcheverry’s 97. The Czech was extremely aggressive to blast 52 winners.

Regarding the service games, Mensik struck 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Jakub Mensik was exceptionally effective on serve to win 80% (52/65) of his 1st serve and 55% (24/44) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Czech broke Etcheverry 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).

Overall Performance in this tournament

The Czech has surrendered 1 set in this competition to win 55% of the points he played.

Mensik has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 63% of his matches (127-76). 10-5 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Mensik has an overall64-27 win-loss record in the last 5 years on hard.

Mensik has an overall 11-6 win-loss record in 2025, 10-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Cap Cana Challenger

Jakub has never competed in this tournament before.

Cap Cana Challenger
Mensik's Record

Damir Dzumhur

Damir Dzumhur

13 - 8win/loss

Hard
7-4
I Hard
2-0
Clay
4-4
Rank
84
High
23
WWWLWWWLWW
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2025 13-8 7-4 4-4 2-0 0-0 0-0
2024 47-30 11-13 28-7 6-7 2-3 0-0
2023 41-34 15-5 18-18 8-9 0-1 0-1
2022 34-28 5-5 19-12 10-11 0-0 0-0
2021 32-32 6-6 17-17 6-6 3-3 0-0

Ranked no. 84, the Bosnian reached the semifinal after beating Tristan Boyer 3-6 6-4 6-2, Benjamin Bonzi 6-0 6-2 and Miomir Kecmanovic 7-6(3) 7-6(5).

In the quarter, The Bosnian had a good straight sets win against Kecmanovic (7-63 7-65). During the match Dzumhur scored 92 points vs Kecmanovic’s 84. Damir was exceptionally aggressive to blast 43 winners.

Talking about serving, Dzumhur bagged 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Damir Dzumhur lost the serve twice and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Dzumhur put 67% of his first serves in, winning 70% (43/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (15/30) on the 2nd serve. Dzumhur broke Kecmanovic twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).

Overall Performance in this tournament

The Bosnian has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.

Damir has a composed 13-8 win-loss record in 2025, 7-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Cap Cana Challenger
Dzumhur's Record

H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)

J.Mensik
D.Dzumhur
4h:55
4h:55
Time on court​
5h:31
5h:31
!
2h:44
2h:44
Last match​
!
2h:20
2h:20
3
3
Match played
3
3
68
68
Games Played​
67
67
7
7
Set played​​
7
7
229
229
Total points​
247
247
76.3
76.3
Avg point​
82.3
82.3
108
108
Winners
94
94
36
36
Avg Winners​
31.3
31.3
47%
47%
Ratio winners
38%
38%
-- Serve --
19
19
Aces
4
4
6.3
6.3
Avg Aces
1.3
1.3
8
8
Double Faults
5
5
2.7
2.7
Avg Double Faults
1.7
1.7
108/128
108/128
1st won total​
94/137
94/137
!
84%
84%
1st won %
69%
69%
45/81
45/81
2nd won total​
40/69
40/69
56%
56%
2nd won %
58%
58%
-- Break Points --
8/12
8/12
BP won
13/30
13/30
2.7/4
2.7/4
Avg BP won
4.3/10
4.3/10
!
67%
67%
Won
43%
43%
7
7
Conceded
19
19
2.3
2.3
Avg Conceded
6.3
6.3
1
1
Broken
6
6
!
0.3
0.3
Avg Broken
2
2
6
6
Saved
13
13

Matches, sets, games and points

Points Mensik Dzumhur
Match played 3 3
Tot Set 7 7
Tot Games 68 67
Pts 229-189 247-194
Total Points 418 441
Winners 108 94
%Winners 47% 38%

Both Mensik and Dzumhur played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Jakub Mensik dropped 1 set, while Damir Dzumhur lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Mensik and Dzumhur have played the same amount of sets 7. However, Mensik played 1 game more than Dzumhur. Jakub scored 108 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Dzumhur managed to score 94 winners (38%).

Serve Performance

Serve Mensik Dzumhur
Aces 19 4
Avg per match 6.3 1.3
1st in 128/209 137/206
%1st in 61% 67%
1st pts 108/128 94/137
%1st pts 84% 69%
2nd pts 45/81 40/69
%2nd pts 56% 58%

Mensik struck 19 aces (6.3 per match). Dzumhur bagged 4 aces (1.3 per match). Mensik won 84% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Dzumhur won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks Mensik Dzumhur
Won 8 13
Converted 8/12 13/30
% Converted 67% 43%
Conceded 7 19
Saved 6 13
% Saved 86% 68%
Times Broken 1 6

The Czech broke his opponents 8 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Czech conceded his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded. Dzumhur broke his opponents 13 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Bosnian conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 68% of the break points that he conceded.

Mensik
R1
Garin
R2
Sakamoto
1/4
Etcheverry
Total
Score 6-3 6-4 6-4 6-2 6-3 6-77 6-3
Tot Set 2 2 3 7
Tot Games 19 18 31 68
pts 62-52 58-40 109-97 229-189
Total points 114 98 206 418
Winners 28 28 52 108
%Winners 45% 48% 48% 47%
SERVE
Aces 7 6 6 19
Double Faults 4 1 3 8
1st in 32/56 31/44 65/109 128/209
% 1st in 57% 70% 60% 61%
1st pts 28/32 28/31 52/65 108/128
% 1st pts 88% 90% 80% 84%
2nd pts 13/24 8/13 24/44 45/81
% 2nd pts 54% 62% 55% 56%
Breaks
Won 2 3 3 8
Converted 2/2 3/4 3/6 8/12
Converted % 100% 75% 50% 67%
Conceded 0 0 7 7
Saved 0/0 0/0 6/7 6
Saved % 86% 29%
Times Broken 0 0 1 1
Dzumhur
R1
Boyer
R2
Bonzi
1/4
Kecmanovic
Total
Score 3-6 6-4 6-2 6-0 6-2 7-63 7-65
Tot Set 3 2 2 7
Tot Games 27 14 26 67
pts 94-78 61-32 92-84 247-194
Total points 172 93 176 441
Winners 29 22 43 94
%Winners 31% 36% 47% 38%
SERVE
Aces 0 1 3 4
Double Faults 1 2 2 5
1st in 46/70 30/45 61/91 137/206
% 1st in 66% 67% 67% 67%
1st pts 29/46 22/30 43/61 94/137
% 1st pts 63% 73% 70% 69%
2nd pts 15/24 10/15 15/30 40/69
% 2nd pts 63% 67% 50% 58%
Breaks
Won 6 5 2 13
Converted 6/15 5/10 2/5 13/30
Converted % 40% 50% 40% 43%
Conceded 6 3 10 19
Saved 2/6 3/3 8/10 13
Saved % 33% 100% 80% 71%
Times Broken 4 0 2 6

Tennis Scores in Cap Cana Challenger

  • Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevicDaniel AltmaierAltmaier (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
  • Jakob Schnaitter/Mark WallnerSchnaitter/Mark WallnerGuido Andreozzi/Theo ArribageAndreozzi/Theo Arribage (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
  • Damir DzumhurDzumhurMiomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (7-63 7-65) – See score progression
  • Francisco Cabral/Hendrik JebensCabral/Hendrik JebensRobert Cash/James TracyCash/James Tracy (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
  • Alexandre MullerMullerConstant LestienneLestienne (7-66 6-4) – See score progression
  • Jakub MensikMensikTomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (6-3 6-77 6-3) – See score progression

Upcoming matches in the draw