Tomas Martin Etcheverry and Jakub Mensik will square off in the quarter of the Cap Cana Challenger for the 2^nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 5:00 pm on ESTADIO. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jakub Mensik who should win in 3 sets.

As per the initial odds, Jakub Mensik is the pick to win this match.
Jakub Mensik -> 1.47
Tomas Martin Etcheverry -> 2.53

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs. Jakub Mensik

This will be the 2^nd time that Tomas Martin Etcheverry and Jakub Mensik square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Mensik (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.

The last time that they squared off, Mensik won 6-4 7-6(6) in the 1^st round in Indian wells back in March 2025.

Highlights Jakub Mensik vs Tomas Martin Etcheverry – Indian wells 06-March-2025

Tomas Martin Etcheverry

Ranked no. 45, the Argentine reached the quarter after beating Unknown Player bye and Nicolas Mejia 6-2 6-4.

In the 2^nd round, Tomas Martin had a good straight sets win against Mejia (6-2 6-4). During the match, Etcheverry scored 62 points vs Mejia’s 49. The Argentine was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.

Regarding the service games, Etcheverry bagged 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Tomas Martin Etcheverry was exceptionally effective on serve to win 73% (29/40) of his 1st serve and 53% (8/15) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Tomas Martin broke Mejia 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).

Etcheverry has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (347-208). 4-4 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Etcheverry has an aggregate 43-44 match record in the last years on hard.

Tomas Martin has a compiled 8-8 win-loss record in 2025, 4-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Cap Cana Challenger

The Argentine has never competed in this tournament before.

Jakub Mensik

Ranked no. 57, Mensik got to the quarter after defeating Cristian Garin 6-3 6-4 and Rei Sakamoto 6-4 6-2.

In the 2^nd round, Mensik had a good straight sets win against Sakamoto (6-4 6-2). During the match Mensik scored 58 points vs Sakamoto’s 40. The Czech was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.

About the serving games, Mensik struck 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Jakub Mensik was exceptionally effective on serve to win 90% (28/31) of his 1st serve and 62% (8/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Mensik broke Sakamoto 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).

Overall Performance in this tournament

Jakub hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.

The Czech has a composed 10-6 win-loss record in 2025, 9-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).

H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)

Matches, sets, games and points

Points	Etcheverry	Mensik
Match played	1	2
Tot Set	2	4
Tot Games	18	37
Pts	62-49	120-92
Total Points	111	212
Winners	29	56
%Winners	47%	47%

Etcheverry played 1 match while Mensik competed in 2 matches. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Etcheverry has played 2 set(s) less than Mensik (2 vs 4). Therefore, Etcheverry played 19 games less than Mensik. The Argentine scored 29 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, The Czech bagged 56 winners (47%).

Serve Performance

Serve	Etcheverry	Mensik
Aces	4	13
Avg per match	4	6.5
1st in	40/55	63/100
%1st in	73%	63%
1st pts	29/40	56/63
%1st pts	73%	89%
2nd pts	8/15	21/37
%2nd pts	53%	57%

Etcheverry fired 4 aces . Mensik scored 13 aces (6.5 per match). Etcheverry won 73% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Mensik won 89% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks	Etcheverry	Mensik
Won	4	5
Converted	4/9	5/6
% Converted	44%	83%
Conceded	2	0
Saved	1	0
% Saved	50%	0%
Times Broken	1	0

The Argentine broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Tomas Martin surrendered his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Czech broke his opponents 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Jakub was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.

Etcheverry
	R2 Mejia	Total
Score	6-2 6-4
Tot Set	2	2
Tot Games	18	18
pts	62-49	62-49
Total points	111	111
Winners	29	29
%Winners	47%	47%
SERVE
Aces	4	4
Double Faults	1	1
1st in	40/55	40/55
% 1st in	73%	73%
1st pts	29/40	29/40
% 1st pts	73%	73%
2nd pts	8/15	8/15
% 2nd pts	53%	53%
Breaks
Won	4	4
Converted	4/9	4/9
Converted %	44%	44%
Conceded	2	2
Saved	1/2	1
Saved %	50%	50%
Times Broken	1	1

Mensik
	R1 Garin	R2 Sakamoto	Total
Score	6-3 6-4	6-4 6-2
Tot Set	2	2	4
Tot Games	19	18	37
pts	62-52	58-40	120-92
Total points	114	98	212
Winners	28	28	56
%Winners	45%	48%	47%
SERVE
Aces	7	6	13
Double Faults	4	1	5
1st in	32/56	31/44	63/100
% 1st in	57%	70%	63%
1st pts	28/32	28/31	56/63
% 1st pts	88%	90%	89%
2nd pts	13/24	8/13	21/37
% 2nd pts	54%	62%	57%
Breaks
Won	2	3	5
Converted	2/2	3/4	5/6
Converted %	100%	75%	83%
Conceded	0	0	0
Saved	0/0	0/0	0
Saved %	–	–	0%
Times Broken	0	0	0

Upcoming matches in the draw

• Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Alexandre MullerMuller – Constant LestienneLestienne (2-0) – H2H and prediction
• Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (2-1) – H2H and prediction