Aoi Ito and Maddison Inglis will clash against each other in the qualifications of the BNP Paribas Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 10:00 am on STADIUM 9. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Aoi Ito who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Aoi Ito is the pick to win this match.
Aoi Ito -> 1.5
Maddison Inglis -> 2.45
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Aoi Ito vs. Maddison Inglis
This will be the 2nd time that Aoi Ito and Maddison Inglis square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Ito (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played each other, Ito won 4-6 6-3 7-5 in the quarter in the W50 Goyang back in 2024.
Aoi Ito
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 12-8 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 67-25 | 55-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 12-3 |
| 2023 | 50-29 | 44-22 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 3-2 | 3-4 |
| 2022 | 26-11 | 17-6 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 5-1 | 4-2 |
| 2021 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 112, the Japanese reached the qualifications after defeating Daria Snigur 4-6 6-1 6-4.
In the qualifications against Snigur, Aoi recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-1 6-4). During the match, Ito scored 104 points vs Snigur’s 99. The Japanese was extremely aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ito scored just 1 ace in the course of the match and she committed only 3 double faults. Aoi Ito lost the serve 6 times and she saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Ito put 64% of her first serves in, winning 52% (33/64) of the points behind her 1st serve and 53% (19/36) on the 2nd serve. Aoi broke Snigur 8 times after converting 40% of her break points (8/20).
Ito has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 69% of her matches (160-73). 10-4 on hard in 2025. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Ito has a compiled126-54 win-loss record in the last 5 years on hard.
Her best result of the year was winning the title the Canberra where she defeated Sijia Wei in the final 6-4 6-3.
The Japanese has an overall 10-5 win-loss record in 2025, 10-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Indian Wells
The Japanese has never competed in this tournament before.
Maddison Inglis
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 15-8 | 15-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 46-24 | 36-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 9-4 | 1-2 |
| 2023 | 35-24 | 23-16 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-24 | 18-16 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-23 | 11-13 | 4-5 | 0-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 136, Maddison got to the qualifications after defeating Anna Bondar 7-5 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Bondar (7-5 6-4). During the match Inglis scored 77 points vs Bondar’s 67. The Australian was quite aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Inglis wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 5 double faults. Maddison Inglis lost the serve twice and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Inglis put 62% of her first serves in, winning 64% (30/47) of the points behind her 1st serve and 62% (18/29) on the 2nd serve. Inglis broke Bondar 4 times after converting 80% of her break points (4/5).
The Australian’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the W75 Brisbane.
The Australian has an overall 12-5 win-loss record in 2025, 12-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ito | Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 22 |
| Pts | 104-99 | 77-67 |
| Total Points | 203 | 144 |
| Winners | 33 | 30 |
| %Winners | 32% | 39% |
Both Ito and Inglis played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Aoi Ito dropped 1 set while Maddison Inglis hasn’t lost a set so far. Ito has played 1 set more than Inglis (3 vs 2). Therefore, Ito played 5 games more than Inglis. Ito scored 33 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Maddison made 30 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ito | Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 0 |
| 1st in | 64/100 | 47/76 |
| %1st in | 64% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 33/64 | 30/47 |
| %1st pts | 52% | 64% |
| 2nd pts | 19/36 | 18/29 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 62% |
Ito scored 1 ace . Inglis didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Ito won 52% points on her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Inglis won 64% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ito | Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 4 |
| Converted | 8/20 | 4/5 |
| % Converted | 40% | 80% |
| Conceded | 15 | 8 |
| Saved | 9 | 6 |
| % Saved | 60% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 6 | 2 |
Ito broke her opponent 8 times with a 40% conversion rate. Aoi surrendered her serve 6 times and she saved 60% of the break points that she conceded. Maddison broke her opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. The Australian conceded her serve twice and she saved 75% of the break points that she conceded.
| Ito | |||
| Q1 Snigur |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 104-99 | 104-99 | |
| Total points | 203 | 203 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 64/100 | 64/100 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 33/64 | 33/64 | |
| % 1st pts | 52% | 52% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/36 | 19/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 8 | 8 | |
| Converted | 8/20 | 8/20 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 15 | 15 | |
| Saved | 9/15 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 6 | |
| Inglis | |||
| Q1 Bondar |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 77-67 | 77-67 | |
| Total points | 144 | 144 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 47/76 | 47/76 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 30/47 | 30/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/29 | 18/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWLWWL
LWWLLWWLWL Tennis Scores in Indian Wells
- Vlad Victor CorneaVictor Cornea – Mihnea Lorin Stefan TurcuLorin Stefan Turcu (5-1 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Victor CrivoiCrivoi – Teodor-Dacian CraciunCraciun (6-4 0-6 10-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Simon BeaupainBeaupain – John Harrison RichmondHarrison Richmond (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Albert Alcaraz IvorraAlcaraz Ivorra – Cosmin OnticaOntica (6-0 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- George BotezanBotezan – Petru-Alexandru LuncanuLuncanu (6-3 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kimberly BirrellBirrell – Cristina BucsaBucsa (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Eva LysLys – Jule NiemeierNiemeier (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaja JuvanJuvan – Whitney OsuigweOsuigwe (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Zeynep SonmezSonmez – Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo – Claire LiuLiu (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – Viktorija GolubicGolubic (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Mirjam BjorklundBjorklund – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maddison InglisInglis – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daria GavrilovaGavrilova – Maria Lourdes CarleLourdes Carle (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hailey BaptisteBaptiste – Leolia JeanjeanJeanjean (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BlinkovaBlinkova – Mccartney KesslerKessler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Lucia BronzettiBronzetti (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sloane StephensStephens – Sofia KeninKenin (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova – Jaqueline CristianCristian (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Emma RaducanuRaducanu – Moyuka UchijimaUchijima (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olga DanilovicDanilovic – Viktoriya TomovaTomova (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Belinda BencicBencic – Tatjana MariaMaria (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alycia ParksParks – Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Lauren DavisDavis – Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jessica Bouzas ManeiroBouzas Maneiro – Anastasia PotapovaPotapova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marie BouzkovaBouzkova – Suzan LamensLamens (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Irina-Camelia BeguBegu – Ann LiLi (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano – Naomi OsakaOsaka (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Petra KvitovaKvitova – Varvara GrachevaGracheva (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mayar SherifSherif – Xin Yu WangYu Wang (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Peyton StearnsStearns – Magda LinetteLinette (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca SramkovaSramkova – Lulu SunSun (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova – Caroline DolehideDolehide (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Renata ZarazuaZarazua – Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Dayana YastremskaYastremska – Yue YuanYuan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Caroline GarciaGarcia – Bernarda PeraPera (0-3) – H2H and prediction
