Botic Van De Zandschulp and Matteo Gigante will face off in the qualifications of the BNP Paribas Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 11:30 am on STADIUM 5. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 2 sets.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.32
Matteo Gigante -> 3.14
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Matteo Gigante
There is no head to head record between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Matteo Gigante since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 10-14 | 7-6 | 3-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 85, the Dutch reached the qualifications after beating Lukas Klein 5-7 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications against Klein, Botic recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-3 6-3). During the match, Van De Zandschulp scored 132 points vs Klein’s 119. The Dutch was exceptionally aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Regarding the service games, Van De Zandschulp bagged 7 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp lost the serve 5 times and he saved 15 break points. Furthermore, Van De Zandschulp put 51% of his first serves in, winning 67% (42/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (27/61) on the 2nd serve. Botic broke Klein 7 times after converting 37% of his break points (7/19).
Van De Zandschulp has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (328-203). 5-4 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Van De Zandschulp has an aggregate 66-47 record in the last years on hard.
The Dutch has an aggregate 5-7 win-loss record in 2025, 5-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Indian Wells
Matteo Gigante
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 15-12 | 7-4 | 8-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 41-25 | 27-10 | 11-10 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 32-29 | 10-5 | 19-18 | 1-5 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 38-20 | 9-1 | 27-15 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 21-15 | 2-2 | 16-7 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 217, Matteo got to the qualifications after beating Mitchell Krueger 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Gigante had a good straight sets win against Krueger (6-4 6-2). During the match Gigante scored 58 points vs Krueger’s 43. Gigante was quite aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Gigante scored 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Matteo Gigante was quite effective on serve to win 72% (23/32) of his 1st serve and 63% (10/16) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Matteo broke Krueger 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Matteo has a compiled 5-5 win-loss record in 2025, 5-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Indian Wells
Gigante has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Van De Zandschulp | Gigante |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 30 | 18 |
Pts | 132-119 | 58-43 |
Total Points | 251 | 101 |
Winners | 42 | 23 |
%Winners | 32% | 40% |
Both Van De Zandschulp and Gigante played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Botic Van De Zandschulp lost 1 set while Matteo Gigante hasn’t conceded a set so far. Van De Zandschulp has played 1 set more than Gigante (3 vs 2). Therefore, Van De Zandschulp played 12 games more than Gigante. Botic scored 42 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Matteo managed to score 23 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Gigante |
---|---|---|
Aces | 7 | 4 |
Avg per match | 7 | 4 |
1st in | 63/124 | 32/48 |
%1st in | 51% | 67% |
1st pts | 42/63 | 23/32 |
%1st pts | 67% | 72% |
2nd pts | 27/61 | 10/16 |
%2nd pts | 44% | 63% |
Van De Zandschulp struck 7 aces . Gigante scored 4 aces . Van De Zandschulp won 67% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Gigante won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Gigante |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 4 |
Converted | 7/19 | 4/6 |
% Converted | 37% | 67% |
Conceded | 20 | 1 |
Saved | 15 | 0 |
% Saved | 75% | 0% |
Times Broken | 5 | 1 |
The Dutch broke his opponent 7 times with a 37% conversion rate. The Dutch surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Gigante broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Italian conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
Van De Zandschulp | |||
Q1 Klein | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 5-7 6-3 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
pts | 132-119 | 132-119 | |
Total points | 251 | 251 | |
Winners | 42 | 42 | |
%Winners | 32% | 32% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 7 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
1st in | 63/124 | 63/124 | |
% 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
1st pts | 42/63 | 42/63 | |
% 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
2nd pts | 27/61 | 27/61 | |
% 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 7 | 7 | |
Converted | 7/19 | 7/19 | |
Converted % | 37% | 37% | |
Conceded | 20 | 20 | |
Saved | 15/20 | 15 | |
Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 5 |
Gigante | |||
Q1 Krueger | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 58-43 | 58-43 | |
Total points | 101 | 101 | |
Winners | 23 | 23 | |
%Winners | 40% | 40% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 32/48 | 32/48 | |
% 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
1st pts | 23/32 | 23/32 | |
% 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 10/16 | 10/16 | |
% 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- David GoffinGoffin – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Li TuTu (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Radu AlbotAlbot (3-3) – H2H and prediction
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Gael MonfilsMonfils (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian GarinGarin – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Nuno BorgesBorges (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Reilly OpelkaOpelka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Kei NishikoriNishikori (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Jordan ThompsonThompson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Alexandre MullerMuller (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GastonGaston – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Michael MmohMmoh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Aleksandar VukicVukic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko – Rinky HijikataHijikata (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – (1-0) – H2H and prediction