Due to the boycott of the Gijon P2 event by the top 100 players in the world, the Premier Padel circuit is currently experiencing a serious issue. This extraordinary action has highlighted a number of fundamental problems in the sport.
The players’ resentment over Premier Padel’s alleged lack of regulation and the International Federation of Padel’s (FIP) unilateral choices is the main cause of the boycott. The athletes contend that there is a lack of professionalism, justice, and transparency in the current system. To make sure that their issues are taken care of and their opinions are acknowledged, they are demanding increased involvement in decision-making procedures.
The most recent change to the ranking system is one of the primary grounds of dispute. In the midst of the 2025 season, the FIP modified the ranking system, which caused tournaments in the same category to get varying points according to their dates. This modification has drawn criticism for fostering an unfair marketplace.
The players have also voiced concerns regarding the FIP’s conflict of interest, given that it is both Premier Padel’s partner and in charge of regulations. The players’ annoyance has been heightened by this dual function, which has resulted in a lack of impartiality and explicit rules.
The boycott has highlighted the need for a more transparent and fair competitive environment by bringing attention to the increasing conflicts between padel players and the regulatory agencies. It is imperative that the governing organizations address these problems and seek a solution that suits all parties involved as the sport aims toward Olympic classification.
It would be interesting to observe how the governing bodies react to the players’ demands and whether any adjustments are made to allay their fears, given the situation is still unclear. The future of professional padel may be significantly impacted by the resolution of this dispute.
