Jakub Paul and Michael Agwi will play each other in the qualifications of the Thionville Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 2:30 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jakub Paul who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jakub Paul is the pick to win this match.
Jakub Paul -> 1.64
Michael Agwi -> 2.15
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jakub Paul vs. Michael Agwi
There is no head to head record between Jakub Paul and Michael Agwi since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Jakub Paul
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 21-12 | 7-2 | 5-4 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 44-27 | 15-9 | 17-11 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-24 | 20-4 | 14-12 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2022 | 25-26 | 4-4 | 20-18 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 34-21 | 4-3 | 17-10 | 11-7 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 343,he will start his run in the Thionville Challenger after he played his last match in the Thionville Challenger where he overcame 6-4 6-1 to Marionneau in the qualifications on the 2nd of March.
The Swiss has an aggregate 13-6 win-loss record in 2025, 6-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Jakub’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Koblenz Challenger.
Talking about his overall career, Paul has an overall 217-168 record. He has a positive 42-38 record on indoor hard courts.
Previously in the Thionville Challenger
Jakub has never competed in this tournament before.
Michael Agwi
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 8-8 | 0-0 | 7-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2024 | 50-17 | 1-1 | 23-9 | 22-6 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2023 | 30-15 | 2-2 | 28-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 16-9 | 0-0 | 16-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 462, Agwi reached the qualifications after beating David Jorda Sanchis 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications, Agwi had a good straight sets win against Jorda Sanchis (7-5 6-3). During the match Agwi scored 70 points vs Jorda Sanchis’s 53. Michael was very aggressive to blast 27 winners.
About the serving games, Agwi scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Michael Agwi was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 77% (27/35) of his 1st serve and 65% (15/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Michael broke Jorda Sanchis 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
The Irish has a compiled 1-2 win-loss record in 2025, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Paul | Agwi |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 21 |
| Pts | 72-54 | 70-53 |
| Total Points | 126 | 123 |
| Winners | 25 | 27 |
| %Winners | 35% | 39% |
Both Paul and Agwi played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Paul and Agwi have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Paul played 4 games less than Agwi. The Swiss scored 25 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Agwi managed to score 27 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Paul | Agwi |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 1 |
| 1st in | 38/55 | 35/58 |
| %1st in | 69% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 25/38 | 27/35 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 13/17 | 15/23 |
| %2nd pts | 76% | 65% |
Paul recorded 1 ace . Agwi also bagged 1 ace . Paul won 66% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 76% of the points. On the other side, Agwi won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Paul | Agwi |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/14 | 3/10 |
| % Converted | 29% | 30% |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 |
| Saved | 1 | 0 |
| % Saved | 100% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Paul broke his opponent 4 times with a 29% conversion rate. Jakub was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points. Michael broke his opponent 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. Agwi conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Paul | ||
| Total | ||
|---|---|---|
| Score | ||
| Tot Set | 0 | |
| Tot Games | 0 | |
| pts | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | |
| %Winners | 0% | |
| SERVE | ||
| Aces | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | |
| 1st in | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | 0% | |
| 1st pts | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | % | |
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | 0% | |
| Breaks | ||
| Won | 0 | |
| Converted | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | 0% | |
| Conceded | 0 | |
| Saved | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | |
| Agwi | |||
| Q1 Jorda Sanchis |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 70-53 | 70-53 | |
| Total points | 123 | 123 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 35/58 | 35/58 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 27/35 | 27/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/23 | 15/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 3/10 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWWLWWL
LWLWWWLWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna CoricCoric – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dan AddedAdded – Matteo MartineauMartineau (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – Lucas PoullainPoullain (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jakub PaulPaul – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – Florian BroskaBroska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Philip HenningHenning – Lilian MarmousezMarmousez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Etienne DonnetDonnet – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
