Daniel Michalski and Facundo Juarez will play each other in the qualifications of the Kigali 2 Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:30 am on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Michalski who should win in 3 sets.
Daniel Michalski -> 1.48
Facundo Juarez -> 2.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Daniel Michalski vs. Facundo Juarez
This will be the 3rd time that Daniel Michalski and Facundo Juarez face off. The head to head is 1-1 for Michalski and Juarez (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on clay.
The last time that they fought against each other, Juarez won 3-6 7-5 7-5 in the quarter in M15 Cairo back in 2019.
Daniel Michalski
12 - 5win/loss
256
243
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 51-29 | 5-3 | 46-26 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-26 | 1-6 | 36-19 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-25 | 4-6 | 36-18 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 51-24 | 0-0 | 51-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-25 | 0-3 | 47-20 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 339, Michalski got to the qualifications after defeating Sebastian Prechtel 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Pole had a good straight sets win against Prechtel (6-2 6-2). During the match, Michalski scored 63 points vs Prechtel’s 41. Daniel was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Michalski wasn’t able to score even 1 ace during the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Daniel Michalski conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 1 break points. Furthermore, Michalski put 63% of his first serves in, winning 83% (25/30) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (9/18) on the 2nd serve. The Pole broke Prechtel 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Michalski has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 63% of his matches (251-148). 10-3 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Michalski has a composed216-110 record in the last 9 years on clay.
Daniel’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Antalya.
Daniel has an overall 12-5 win-loss record in 2025, 10-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Kigali 2 Challenger
The Pole has never competed in this tournament before.
Facundo Juarez
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 26-20 | 0-0 | 26-19 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-10 | 0-0 | 33-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-20 | 0-0 | 22-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-24 | 0-1 | 28-23 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 65-30 | 0-1 | 65-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 496, the Argentine got to the qualifications after beating Mateo Barreiros Reyes 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Barreiros Reyes (6-4 6-2). During the match Juarez scored 73 points vs Barreiros Reyes’s 58. The Argentine was exceptionally aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Juarez bagged 2 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Facundo Juarez was quite effective on serve to win 77% (30/39) of his 1st serve and 54% (13/24) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Argentine broke Barreiros Reyes 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
The Argentine has an aggregate 2-1 win-loss record in 2025, 2-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Michalski | Juarez |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 18 |
| Pts | 63-41 | 73-58 |
| Total Points | 104 | 131 |
| Winners | 25 | 30 |
| %Winners | 40% | 41% |
Both Michalski and Juarez played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Michalski and Juarez have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Michalski played 2 games less than Juarez. Daniel scored 25 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The Argentine scored 30 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Michalski | Juarez |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 2 |
| 1st in | 30/48 | 39/63 |
| %1st in | 63% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 25/30 | 30/39 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 9/18 | 13/24 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 54% |
Michalski didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Juarez recorded 2 aces . Michalski won 83% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Juarez won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Michalski | Juarez |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 3/9 |
| % Converted | 50% | 33% |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 |
| Saved | 1 | 1 |
| % Saved | 100% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Daniel broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Michalski pretty effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 1 break points. Facundo broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Juarez was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Michalski | |||
| Q1 Prechtel | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 63-41 | 63-41 | |
| Total points | 104 | 104 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 30/48 | 30/48 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 25/30 | 25/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/18 | 9/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Juarez | |||
| Q1 Barreiros | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 73-58 | 73-58 | |
| Total points | 131 | 131 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 39/63 | 39/63 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 30/39 | 30/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/24 | 13/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Maxime ChazalChazal – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Clement TaburTabur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Dominik KellovskyKellovsky (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Ivan GakhovGakhov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander DonskiDonski – Yanki ErelErel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover – Max HoukesHoukes (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mathys ErhardErhard – Maxime JanvierJanvier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luka PavlovicPavlovic – Adrian OetzbachOetzbach (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Alex Marti PujolrasMarti Pujolras (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Facundo JuarezJuarez (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maik SteinerSteiner – Alafia AyeniAyeni (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PicchionePicchione – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (0-0) – H2H and prediction