Mackenzie Mcdonald and Kamil Majchrzak will face off in the semifinal of the San Diego Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 2:30 pm on STADIUM. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mackenzie Mcdonald who should win in 3 sets.
Mackenzie Mcdonald -> 1.57
Kamil Majchrzak -> 2.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Mackenzie Mcdonald vs. Kamil Majchrzak
This will be the 2nd time that Mackenzie Mcdonald and Kamil Majchrzak face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Mcdonald (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Mcdonald won 6-3 6-4 in the 2nd round in the Seoul Challenger back in 2018.
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 12-6 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 26-23 | 18-12 | 0-4 | 3-1 | 5-6 | 0-0 |
2023 | 35-30 | 23-15 | 0-6 | 4-3 | 8-6 | 0-0 |
2022 | 27-31 | 16-16 | 4-6 | 4-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 42-26 | 15-12 | 12-5 | 9-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 117, the American reached the semifinal after beating Karue Sell 6-3 6-3, Matteo Gigante 6-3 7-5 and Trevor Svajda 6-3 6-4.
In the quarter, Mackenzie had a good straight sets win against Svajda (6-3 6-4). During the match, Mcdonald scored 76 points vs Svajda’s 66. The American was very aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Mcdonald made 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Mackenzie Mcdonald lost the serve twice and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Mcdonald put 56% of his first serves in, winning 66% (27/41) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (15/32) on the 2nd serve. Mackenzie broke Svajda 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American hasn’t conceded yet a set in this competition to win 56% of the points he played.
Mcdonald has good win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (279-220). 6-3 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Mcdonald has an aggregate 172-118 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Mackenzie’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Oeiras 2 Challenger.
Mackenzie has a composed 11-5 win-loss record in 2025, 6-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the San Diego Challenger
Mcdonald has never competed in this tournament before.
Kamil Majchrzak
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 10-4 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 63-19 | 26-6 | 34-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 28-22 | 19-10 | 4-6 | 4-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 34-21 | 4-4 | 16-9 | 5-5 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 118, Majchrzak reached the semifinal after beating Colton Smith 7-6(3) 6-4, Michael Mmoh 7-5 7-5 and Alex Bolt 7-6(2) 1-1 ret..
In the quarter against Bolt, Majchrzak had a free pass after Bolt retired on a 7-62
1-1 . scoreline.The Pole has a composed 8-3 win-loss record in 2025, 6-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Mcdonald | Majchrzak |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 3 |
Tot Set | 6 | 7 |
Tot Games | 58 | 62 |
Pts | 216-173 | 210-190 |
Total Points | 389 | 400 |
Winners | 80 | 90 |
%Winners | 37% | 43% |
Both Mcdonald and Majchrzak played 3 matches. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Mcdonald has played 1 set(s) less than Majchrzak (6 vs 7). Therefore, Mcdonald played 4 games less than Majchrzak. The American scored 80 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Kamil struck 90 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Mcdonald | Majchrzak |
---|---|---|
Aces | 12 | 9 |
Avg per match | 4 | 3 |
1st in | 113/192 | 124/201 |
%1st in | 59% | 62% |
1st pts | 80/113 | 90/124 |
%1st pts | 71% | 73% |
2nd pts | 39/79 | 43/77 |
%2nd pts | 49% | 56% |
Mcdonald scored 12 aces (4 per match). Majchrzak struck 9 aces (3 per match). Mcdonald won 71% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Majchrzak won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Mcdonald | Majchrzak |
---|---|---|
Won | 15 | 6 |
Converted | 15/33 | 6/16 |
% Converted | 45% | 38% |
Conceded | 28 | 19 |
Saved | 22 | 16 |
% Saved | 79% | 84% |
Times Broken | 6 | 3 |
Mackenzie broke his opponents 15 times with a 45% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded. Majchrzak broke his opponents 6 times with a 38% conversion rate. Kamil conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 84% of the break points that he conceded.
Mcdonald | |||||
R1 Sell | R2 Gigante | 1/4 Svajda | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-3 7-5 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 21 | 19 | 58 | |
pts | 60-41 | 80-66 | 76-66 | 216-173 | |
Total points | 101 | 146 | 142 | 389 | |
Winners | 22 | 31 | 27 | 80 | |
%Winners | 37% | 39% | 36% | 37% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 2 | 5 | 5 | 12 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 2 | 4 | 10 | |
1st in | 28/48 | 44/71 | 41/73 | 113/192 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 62% | 56% | 59% | |
1st pts | 22/28 | 31/44 | 27/41 | 80/113 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 70% | 66% | 71% | |
2nd pts | 10/20 | 14/27 | 15/32 | 39/79 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 52% | 47% | 49% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 5 | 5 | 5 | 15 | |
Converted | 5/9 | 5/12 | 5/12 | 15/33 | |
Converted % | 56% | 42% | 42% | 45% | |
Conceded | 5 | 10 | 13 | 28 | |
Saved | 3/5 | 8/10 | 11/13 | 22 | |
Saved % | 60% | 80% | 85% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
Majchrzak | |||||
R1 Smith | R2 Mmoh | 1/4 Bolt | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-63 6-4 | 7-5 7-5 | 7-62 1-1 ret. | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 23 | 24 | 15 | 62 | |
pts | 71-67 | 82-74 | 57-49 | 210-190 | |
Total points | 138 | 156 | 106 | 400 | |
Winners | 27 | 41 | 22 | 90 | |
%Winners | 38% | 50% | 39% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 3 | 6 | 0 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | |
1st in | 42/69 | 53/83 | 29/49 | 124/201 | |
% 1st in | 61% | 64% | 59% | 62% | |
1st pts | 27/42 | 41/53 | 22/29 | 90/124 | |
% 1st pts | 64% | 77% | 76% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 18/27 | 14/30 | 11/20 | 43/77 | |
% 2nd pts | 67% | 47% | 55% | 56% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |
Converted | 2/4 | 3/8 | 1/4 | 6/16 | |
Converted % | 50% | 38% | 25% | 38% | |
Conceded | 5 | 8 | 6 | 19 | |
Saved | 4/5 | 7/8 | 5/6 | 16 | |
Saved % | 80% | 88% | 83% | 84% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Tennis Scores in San Diego Challenger
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Arthur CazauxCazaux (7-5 6-71 6-4) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Trevor SvajdaSvajda (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Alex BoltBolt (7-62 1-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Taro DanielDaniel (6-72 6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- George Goldhoff/Trey HilderbrandGoldhoff/Trey Hilderbrand – Tristan Boyer/Jamie VanceBoyer/Jamie Vance (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Arthur CazauxCazaux (7-5 6-7(1) 6-4) – See score progression
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Taro DanielDaniel (6-7(2) 6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Trevor SvajdaSvajda (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Alex BoltBolt (7-6(2) 1-1 ret.) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (1-0) – H2H and prediction