Vilius Gaubas and Dino Prizmic will play each other in the quarter of the Lugano Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 7:00 pm on CENTRALE. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Dino Prizmic who should win in 2 sets.
Dino Prizmic -> 1.26
Vilius Gaubas -> 3.55
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Vilius Gaubas vs. Dino Prizmic
There is no head to head record between Vilius Gaubas and Dino Prizmic since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Vilius Gaubas
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 21-14 | 1-3 | 18-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 48-35 | 7-4 | 40-28 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 59-26 | 3-3 | 55-21 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 19-17 | 4-4 | 15-12 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 184, Vilius got to the quarter after beating Dominic Stricker 6-3 1-6 6-2
and Mees Rottgering 6-7(2) 7-5 6-4.In the 2nd round against Rottgering, Gaubas recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-72 7-5 6-4). During the match, Gaubas scored 101 points vs Rottgering’s 99. Vilius was quite aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gaubas fired 9 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Vilius Gaubas was pretty efficient on serve to win 71% (51/72) of his 1st serve and 52% (13/25) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. The Lithuanian broke Rottgering 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Gaubas has lost 2 set in this event to win 51% of the points he played.
Gaubas has a winning win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 59% of his matches (132-90). 2-3 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Gaubas has an aggregate4-9 match record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
Vilius has an overall 3-6 win-loss record in 2025, 2-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lugano Challenger
Gaubas has never competed in this tournament before.
Dino Prizmic
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 16-7 | 0-1 | 8-2 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 20-18 | 5-4 | 4-5 | 10-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 37-19 | 2-1 | 23-9 | 12-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 28-9 | 21-1 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 394, Dino got to the quarter after defeating Gianluca Mager 6-4 6-1, Giovanni Fonio 7-5 3-6 6-2, Jakub Paul 6-3 6-2 and Alexander Blockx 6-3 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Dino had a good straight sets win against Blockx (6-3 6-2). During the match Prizmic scored 69 points vs Blockx’s 55. Dino was quite aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about serving, Prizmic made 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Dino Prizmic was very effective on serve to win 71% (24/34) of his 1st serve and 64% (16/25) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Dino broke Blockx 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Croatian started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Prizmic has an aggregate 7-3 win-loss record in 2025, 7-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Gaubas | Prizmic |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 4 |
Tot Set | 6 | 9 |
Tot Games | 59 | 80 |
Pts | 178-170 | 293-232 |
Total Points | 348 | 525 |
Winners | 91 | 112 |
%Winners | 51% | 38% |
Gaubas played 2 matches while Prizmic competed in 4 matches. Prizmic started his run from the qualifications while Gaubas had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Vilius Gaubas dropped 2 sets, while Dino Prizmic surrendered 1 set. Gaubas has played 3 set(s) less than Prizmic (6 vs 9). Therefore, Gaubas played 21 games less than Prizmic. Gaubas scored 91 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, The Croatian bagged 112 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Gaubas | Prizmic |
---|---|---|
Aces | 13 | 15 |
Avg per match | 6.5 | 3.8 |
1st in | 134/171 | 147/234 |
%1st in | 78% | 63% |
1st pts | 91/134 | 112/147 |
%1st pts | 68% | 76% |
2nd pts | 20/37 | 54/87 |
%2nd pts | 54% | 62% |
Gaubas fired 13 aces (6.5 per match). Prizmic scored 15 aces (3.8 per match). Gaubas won 68% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Prizmic won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Gaubas | Prizmic |
---|---|---|
Won | 9 | 13 |
Converted | 9/13 | 13/35 |
% Converted | 69% | 37% |
Conceded | 12 | 9 |
Saved | 6 | 6 |
% Saved | 50% | 67% |
Times Broken | 6 | 3 |
Vilius broke his opponents 9 times with a 69% conversion rate. The Lithuanian conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Croatian broke his opponents 13 times with a 37% conversion rate. Dino conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Gaubas | ||||
R1 Stricker | R2 Rottgering | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 1-6 6-2 | 6-72 7-5 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 24 | 35 | 59 | |
pts | 77-71 | 101-99 | 178-170 | |
Total points | 148 | 200 | 348 | |
Winners | 40 | 51 | 91 | |
%Winners | 52% | 50% | 51% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 4 | 9 | 13 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
1st in | 62/74 | 72/97 | 134/171 | |
% 1st in | 84% | 74% | 78% | |
1st pts | 40/62 | 51/72 | 91/134 | |
% 1st pts | 65% | 71% | 68% | |
2nd pts | 7/12 | 13/25 | 20/37 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 52% | 54% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
Converted | 4/6 | 5/7 | 9/13 | |
Converted % | 67% | 71% | 69% | |
Conceded | 9 | 3 | 12 | |
Saved | 6/9 | 0/3 | 6 | |
Saved % | 67% | 0% | 34% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Prizmic | ||||||
Q1 Mager | Q3 Fonio | R1 Paul | R2 Blockx | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-1 | 7-5 3-6 6-2 | 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 29 | 17 | 17 | 80 | |
pts | 67-51 | 92-84 | 65-42 | 69-55 | 293-232 | |
Total points | 118 | 176 | 107 | 124 | 525 | |
Winners | 23 | 39 | 26 | 24 | 112 | |
%Winners | 34% | 42% | 40% | 35% | 38% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 8 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 15 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 14 | |
1st in | 29/52 | 55/78 | 29/45 | 34/59 | 147/234 | |
% 1st in | 56% | 71% | 64% | 58% | 63% | |
1st pts | 23/29 | 39/55 | 26/29 | 24/34 | 112/147 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 71% | 90% | 71% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 15/23 | 13/23 | 10/16 | 16/25 | 54/87 | |
% 2nd pts | 65% | 57% | 63% | 64% | 62% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 13 | |
Converted | 3/9 | 4/13 | 3/7 | 3/6 | 13/35 | |
Converted % | 33% | 31% | 43% | 50% | 37% | |
Conceded | 2 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 9 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2/5 | 0/0 | 2/2 | 6 | |
Saved % | 100% | 40% | – | 100% | 120% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Henri SquireSquire – Borna CoricCoric (0-0) – H2H and prediction