Eliot Spizzirri and Andres Martin will play each other in the 2nd round of the San Diego Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 10:00 am on STADIUM. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Eliot Spizzirri who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Eliot Spizzirri is the pick to win this match.
Eliot Spizzirri -> 1.39
Andres Martin -> 2.81
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Eliot Spizzirri vs. Andres Martin
This will be the 2nd time that Eliot Spizzirri and Andres Martin play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Spizzirri (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on hard.
The last time that they played each other, Spizzirri won 6-0 6-3 in the 1st round in the Sioux Falls Challenger back in 2024.
Eliot Spizzirri
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 25-19 | 10-7 | 7-6 | 4-1 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 35-17 | 28-11 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 9-10 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-4 | 15-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 189 (career-high), the American got to the 2nd round after beating Juan Alejandro Hernandez 6-3 6-1.
In the 1st round, Eliot had a good straight sets win against Alejandro Hernandez (6-3 6-1). During the match, Spizzirri scored 59 points vs Alejandro Hernandez’s 35. Spizzirri was quite aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Spizzirri blasted 3 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults. Eliot Spizzirri was pretty efficient on serve to win 88% (23/26) of his 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Eliot broke Alejandro Hernandez 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Spizzirri has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 61% of his matches (71-45). 3-4 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Spizzirri has a composed53-31 match record in the last 5 years on hard.
The American’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Cleveland Challenger.
The American has an aggregate 7-5 win-loss record in 2025, 3-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the San Diego Challenger
Spizzirri has never competed in this tournament before.
Andres Martin
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-14 | 24-10 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 19-16 | 14-11 | 0-1 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-17 | 14-11 | 1-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-8 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 529, Martin reached the 2nd round after beating Oscar Weightman 6-2 6-3, Nathan Ponwith 6-1 6-1 and Zachary Svajda 6-4 3-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, The American defeated Svajda (6-4 3-6 6-3). During the match Martin scored 93 points vs Svajda’s 84. Andres was pretty aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about serving, Martin managed to score 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Andres Martin was very effective on serve to win 76% (37/49) of his 1st serve and 56% (18/32) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Andres broke Svajda 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
The American’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Kingston.
Andres has a compiled 12-4 win-loss record in 2025, 8-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Spizzirri | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 59 |
| Pts | 59-35 | 217-157 |
| Total Points | 94 | 374 |
| Winners | 23 | 90 |
| %Winners | 39% | 41% |
Spizzirri played 1 match while Martin competed in 3 matches. Martin started his run from the qualifications while Spizzirri had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Andres Martin dropped 1 set while Eliot Spizzirri hasn’t conceded a set so far. Spizzirri has played 5 set(s) less than Martin (2 vs 7). Therefore, Spizzirri played 43 games less than Martin. The American scored 23 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Andres managed to score 90 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Spizzirri | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 2.3 |
| 1st in | 26/43 | 114/178 |
| %1st in | 60% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 23/26 | 90/114 |
| %1st pts | 88% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 39/64 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 61% |
Spizzirri blasted 3 aces . Martin fired 7 aces (2.3 per match). Spizzirri won 88% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Martin won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Spizzirri | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 11 |
| Converted | 4/5 | 11/17 |
| % Converted | 80% | 65% |
| Conceded | 1 | 6 |
| Saved | 1 | 4 |
| % Saved | 100% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Spizzirri broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. The American was rock solid on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 1 break points. The American broke his opponents 11 times with a 65% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Spizzirri | |||
| R1 Alejandro |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 59-35 | 59-35 | |
| Total points | 94 | 94 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 26/43 | 26/43 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 23/26 | 23/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Martin | |||||
| Q1 Weightman |
Q3 Ponwith |
R1 Svajda |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | 6-1 6-1 | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 14 | 28 | 59 | |
| pts | 56-35 | 68-38 | 93-84 | 217-157 | |
| Total points | 91 | 106 | 177 | 374 | |
| Winners | 27 | 26 | 37 | 90 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 38% | 40% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 1 | 2 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 30/44 | 35/53 | 49/81 | 114/178 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 66% | 60% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 27/30 | 26/35 | 37/49 | 90/114 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 74% | 76% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/14 | 11/18 | 18/32 | 39/64 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 61% | 56% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 3 | 11 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 5/8 | 3/5 | 11/17 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 63% | 60% | 65% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 3/3 | 1/3 | 4 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | 33% | 133% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLWLLWLLL
WLWLWWLWWL Tennis Scores in San Diego Challenger
- Trevor SvajdaSvajda – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Michael MmohMmoh (7-5 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alex BoltBolt – Govind NandaNanda (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mackenzie McdonaldMackenzie – Matteo GiganteMatteo (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Alex BoltBolt (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Taro DanielDaniel (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
