Denis Yevseyev and Philip Henning will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Glasgow Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:30 pm on COURT 8. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Denis Yevseyev who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Denis Yevseyev is the pick to win this match.
Denis Yevseyev -> 1.63
Philip Henning -> 2.17
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Denis Yevseyev vs. Philip Henning
There is no head to head record between Denis Yevseyev and Philip Henning since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Denis Yevseyev
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 10-12 | 1-3 | 3-2 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 35-37 | 14-14 | 12-13 | 7-8 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 50-36 | 23-16 | 16-14 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 39-31 | 11-9 | 12-12 | 14-9 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 36-30 | 4-5 | 22-15 | 10-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 262, Yevseyev reached the 2nd round after beating Harry Wendelken 7-5 6-3.
In the 1st round, Denis had a good straight sets win against Wendelken (7-5 6-3). During the match, Yevseyev scored 69 points vs Wendelken’s 55. The Kazakhstani was pretty aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Yevseyev fired 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Denis Yevseyev was extremely effective on serve to win 77% (24/31) of his 1st serve and 66% (19/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Yevseyev broke Wendelken 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Yevseyev has positive match record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (347-268). 5-3 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Yevseyev has a composed 62-57 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
The Kazakhstani has a compiled 6-6 win-loss record in 2025, 5-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Glasgow Challenger
Denis has never competed in this tournament before.
Philip Henning
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 55-15 | 43-9 | 12-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-4 | 23-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 5-3 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 5-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 331, Philip got to the 2nd round after defeating Gauthier Onclin 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, The South African had a good straight sets win against Onclin (6-4 6-3). During the match Henning scored 69 points vs Onclin’s 51. The South African was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Henning fired 4 aces and he was quite consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Philip Henning was exceptionally effective on serve to win 78% (29/37) of his 1st serve and 62% (8/13) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The South African broke Onclin 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Henning has a composed 1-1 win-loss record in 2025, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Yevseyev | Henning |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 19 |
| Pts | 69-55 | 69-51 |
| Total Points | 124 | 120 |
| Winners | 24 | 29 |
| %Winners | 35% | 42% |
Both Yevseyev and Henning played 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Yevseyev and Henning have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Yevseyev played 2 games more than Henning. The Kazakhstani scored 24 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Philip blasted 29 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Yevseyev | Henning |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 4 |
| 1st in | 31/60 | 37/50 |
| %1st in | 52% | 74% |
| 1st pts | 24/31 | 29/37 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 19/29 | 8/13 |
| %2nd pts | 66% | 62% |
Yevseyev blasted 4 aces . Henning struck 4 aces . Yevseyev won 77% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 66% of the points. On the other side, Henning won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Yevseyev | Henning |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 |
| % Converted | 50% | 50% |
| Conceded | 3 | 2 |
| Saved | 2 | 1 |
| % Saved | 67% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Denis broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Yevseyev lost his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The South African broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Philip conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Yevseyev | |||
| R1 Wendelken |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 69-55 | 69-55 | |
| Total points | 124 | 124 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 31/60 | 31/60 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 24/31 | 24/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/29 | 19/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 66% | 66% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Henning | |||
| R1 Onclin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 69-51 | 69-51 | |
| Total points | 120 | 120 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 37/50 | 37/50 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 29/37 | 29/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/13 | 8/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLLLLW
LLWWLWLWL Tennis Scores in Glasgow Challenger
- Johannus MondayMonday – Giles HusseyHussey (7-5 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong (4-6 6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Max Hans RehbergMax – Constant LestienneConstant (6-3 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Matteo MartineauMatteo – Beibit ZhukayevBeibit (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Philip HenningHenning – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
