Alex De Minaur and Botic Van De Zandschulp will face off in the 2nd round of the Qatar ExxonMobil Open for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 2:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Alex De Minaur who should win in 2 sets.
Alex De Minaur -> 1.11
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 6.55
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Alex De Minaur vs. Botic Van De Zandschulp
This will be the 3rd time that Alex De Minaur and Botic Van De Zandschulp face off. The head to head is 2-0 for De Minaur (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played each other, De Minaur won 6-1 7-5 6-4 in the 1st round in at the Australian Open back in January 2025.
Highlights Alex De Minaur vs Botic Van De Zandschulp – Australian Open 14-January-2025
Alex De Minaur
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 56-24 | 30-11 | 10-5 | 13-6 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 47-21 | 19-6 | 10-5 | 11-9 | 7-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-26 | 26-12 | 4-5 | 10-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-25 | 19-10 | 9-6 | 12-5 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-25 | 10-10 | 4-5 | 3-7 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 8, the Australian reached the 2nd round after defeating Roman Safiullin 6-1 7-5.
In the 1st round, Alex had a good straight sets win against Safiullin (6-1 7-5). During the match, De Minaur scored 72 points vs Safiullin’s 59. Alex was very aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, De Minaur recorded 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Alex De Minaur lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, De Minaur put 56% of his first serves in, winning 76% (29/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (15/30) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Safiullin 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
De Minaur has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (371-207). 7-1 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, De Minaur has a compiled 178-87 match record in the last years on hard.
Alex’s best result of the season was reaching the final in Rotterdam.
Alex has an overall 12-2 win-loss record in 2025, 7-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Doha
Alex has never competed in this tournament before.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-32 | 13-11 | 11-10 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 87, Van De Zandschulp got to the 2nd round after defeating Ergi Kirkin 6-1 2-1 ret.
, Otto Virtanen 6-1 6-4 and Abedallah Shelbayh 7-5 6-3.In the 1st round, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Shelbayh (7-5 6-3). During the match Van De Zandschulp scored 71 points vs Shelbayh’s 53. The Dutch was very aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Van De Zandschulp struck 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Botic Van De Zandschulp was exceptionally effective on serve to win 74% (32/43) of his 1st serve and 53% (9/17) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Van De Zandschulp broke Shelbayh 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Van De Zandschulp has an overall 3-5 win-loss record in 2025, 3-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Doha
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2022 and 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | De Minaur | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 48 |
| Pts | 72-59 | 162-101 |
| Total Points | 131 | 263 |
| Winners | 29 | 73 |
| %Winners | 40% | 45% |
De Minaur played 1 match while Van De Zandschulp competed in 3 matches. Van De Zandschulp started his run from the qualifications while De Minaur had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. De Minaur has played 5 set(s) less than Van De Zandschulp (2 vs 7). Therefore, De Minaur played 29 games less than Van De Zandschulp. The Australian scored 29 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The Dutch made 73 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | De Minaur | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 4.3 |
| 1st in | 38/68 | 88/128 |
| %1st in | 56% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 29/38 | 73/88 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 15/30 | 26/40 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 65% |
De Minaur bagged 3 aces . Van De Zandschulp bagged 13 aces (4.3 per match). De Minaur won 76% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Van De Zandschulp won 83% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | De Minaur | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 10 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 10/19 |
| % Converted | 50% | 53% |
| Conceded | 5 | 4 |
| Saved | 4 | 2 |
| % Saved | 80% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
The Australian broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. De Minaur lost his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Van De Zandschulp broke his opponents 10 times with a 53% conversion rate. Botic conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| De Minaur | |||
| R1 Safiullin | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 72-59 | 72-59 | |
| Total points | 131 | 131 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 38/68 | 38/68 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 29/38 | 29/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/30 | 15/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Van De Zandschulp | |||||
| Q1 Kirkin | Q3 Virtanen | R1 Shelbayh | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 2-1 ret. | 6-1 6-4 | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 10 | 17 | 21 | 48 | |
| pts | 38-20 | 53-28 | 71-53 | 162-101 | |
| Total points | 58 | 81 | 124 | 263 | |
| Winners | 13 | 28 | 32 | 73 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 53% | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 6 | 3 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 15/28 | 30/40 | 43/60 | 88/128 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 75% | 72% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 13/15 | 28/30 | 32/43 | 73/88 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 93% | 74% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/13 | 8/10 | 9/17 | 26/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 80% | 53% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/3 | 4/10 | 10/19 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 100% | 40% | 53% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores in Doha
- Zizou BergsBergs – Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Felix Auger-AliassimeAuger-Aliassime – Quentin HalysHalys (4-6 6-4 7-62) – See score progression
- Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini – Novak DjokovicDjokovic (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (7-66 6-3) – See score progression
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Jan-Lennard StruffStruff (7-65 7-67) – See score progression
- Joe Salisbury/Neal SkupskiSalisbury/Neal Skupski – Matthew Ebden/Joran VliegenEbden/Joran Vliegen (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Karen KhachanovKhachanov (4-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Andrey RublevRublev – Alexander BublikBublik (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Luca NardiNardi – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Jack DraperDraper – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (6-2 7-64) – See score progression
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Grigor DimitrovDimitrov (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Hady HabibHabib (7-67 7-63) – See score progression
- Carlos AlcarazAlcaraz – Marin CilicCilic (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Aziz DougazDougaz (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Harri Heliovaara/Henry PattenHeliovaara/Henry Patten – Tallon Griekspoor/Adam PavlasekGriekspoor/Adam Pavlasek (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Luca NardiNardi – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini – Novak DjokovicDjokovic (7-6(4) 6-2) – See score progression
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Jan-Lennard StruffStruff (7-6(5) 7-6(7)) – See score progression
- Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime – Quentin HalysHalys (4-6 6-4 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Zizou BergsBergs – Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut (6-4 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Karen KhachanovKhachanov (4-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Andrey RublevRublev – Alexander BublikBublik (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (7-6(6) 6-3) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Alex De MinaurDe Minaur (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Jack DraperDraper (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey RublevRublev – Nuno BorgesBorges (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zizou BergsBergs – Daniil MedvedevMedvedev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Jiri LeheckaLehecka (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia – (0-0) – H2H and prediction