Jack Draper and Christopher O Connell will square off in the 2nd round of the Qatar ExxonMobil Open for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 4:00 pm on GRANDSTAND 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jack Draper who should win in 2 sets.
Jack Draper -> 1.171
Christopher O Connell -> 5.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jack Draper vs. Christopher O Connell
This will be the 3rd time that Jack Draper and Christopher O Connell face off. The head to head is 2-0 for O (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on hard.
The last time that they squared off, O won 1-6 6-3 6-2 in the 1st round in Indian wells back in 2024.
Jack Draper
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 30-9 | 14-3 | 12-4 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-22 | 19-10 | 5-7 | 7-3 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-15 | 15-8 | 3-3 | 16-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-19 | 12-6 | 2-2 | 26-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-16 | 6-6 | 7-5 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 16, Jack got to the 2nd round after beating Alexei Popyrin 6-2 7-6(4).
In the 1st round, Jack had a good straight sets win against Popyrin (6-2 7-64). During the match, Draper scored 66 points vs Popyrin’s 57. Jack was very aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Regarding the service games, Draper bagged 8 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults. Jack Draper was quite effective on serve to win 76% (34/45) of his 1st serve and 67% (12/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Brit broke Popyrin twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Draper has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 69% of his matches (230-105). 4-1 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Draper has an aggregate109-44 record in the last 8 years on hard.
The Brit has an aggregate 4-1 win-loss record in 2025, 4-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Doha
The Brit has never competed in this tournament before.
Christopher O Connell
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 23-28 | 19-15 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 1-6 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 28-26 | 23-16 | 2-4 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-34 | 19-18 | 11-9 | 4-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 50-25 | 30-16 | 12-5 | 3-1 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-16 | 14-9 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 82, O reached the 2nd round after defeating Yosuke Watanuki 6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-3, Pavel Kotov 6-4 6-2 and Hady Habib 7-6(7) 7-6(3).
In the 1st round, Christopher had a good straight sets win against Habib (7-67 7-63). During the match O scored 91 points vs Habib’s 85. The Australian was very aggressive to blast 41 winners.
About the serving games, O scored 12 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Christopher O Connell was extremely effective on serve to win 77% (41/53) of his 1st serve and 61% (20/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Christopher broke Habib once after converting 20% of his break points (1/5).
The Australian has a compiled 4-3 win-loss record in 2025, 4-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Doha
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Draper | O |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 79 |
| Pts | 66-57 | 274-237 |
| Total Points | 123 | 511 |
| Winners | 34 | 126 |
| %Winners | 52% | 46% |
Draper played 1 match while O competed in 3 matches. O started his run from the qualifications while Draper had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Christopher O Connell surrendered 1 set while Jack Draper hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Draper has played 5 set(s) less than O (2 vs 7). Therefore, Draper played 58 games less than O. Jack scored 34 winners (52% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian made 126 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Draper | O |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 31 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 10.3 |
| 1st in | 45/63 | 163/267 |
| %1st in | 71% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 34/45 | 126/163 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 12/18 | 64/104 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 62% |
Draper struck 8 aces . O made 31 aces (10.3 per match). Draper won 76% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, O won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Draper | O |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 6 |
| Converted | 2/4 | 6/16 |
| % Converted | 50% | 38% |
| Conceded | 1 | 12 |
| Saved | 1 | 10 |
| % Saved | 100% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Draper broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. Jack pretty effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 1 break points. Christopher broke his opponents 6 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve twice and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Draper | |||
| R1 Popyrin | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 66-57 | 66-57 | |
| Total points | 123 | 123 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 52% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 45/63 | 45/63 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 34/45 | 34/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/18 | 12/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| O | |||||
| Q1 Watanuki | Q3 Kotov | R1 Habib | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-73 7-64 6-3 | 6-4 6-2 | 7-67 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 18 | 26 | 79 | |
| pts | 117-110 | 66-42 | 91-85 | 274-237 | |
| Total points | 227 | 108 | 176 | 511 | |
| Winners | 62 | 23 | 41 | 126 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 35% | 45% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 13 | 6 | 12 | 31 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 80/129 | 30/52 | 53/86 | 163/267 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 58% | 62% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 62/80 | 23/30 | 41/53 | 126/163 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 77% | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 29/49 | 15/22 | 20/33 | 64/104 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 68% | 61% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6 | |
| Converted | 1/4 | 4/7 | 1/5 | 6/16 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 57% | 20% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 4 | 2 | 12 | |
| Saved | 6/6 | 3/4 | 1/2 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 75% | 50% | 225% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores in Doha
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Karen KhachanovKhachanov (4-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (7-66 6-3) – See score progression
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Jan-Lennard StruffStruff (7-65 7-67) – See score progression
- Joe Salisbury/Neal SkupskiSalisbury/Neal Skupski – Matthew Ebden/Joran VliegenEbden/Joran Vliegen (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Zizou BergsBergs – Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Andrey RublevRublev – Alexander BublikBublik (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Luca NardiNardi – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Felix Auger-AliassimeAuger-Aliassime – Quentin HalysHalys (4-6 6-4 7-62) – See score progression
- Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini – Novak DjokovicDjokovic (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Hady HabibHabib (7-67 7-63) – See score progression
- Carlos AlcarazAlcaraz – Marin CilicCilic (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Aziz DougazDougaz (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Harri Heliovaara/Henry PattenHeliovaara/Henry Patten – Tallon Griekspoor/Adam PavlasekGriekspoor/Adam Pavlasek (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Grigor DimitrovDimitrov (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Jack DraperDraper – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (6-2 7-64) – See score progression
- Luca NardiNardi – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini – Novak DjokovicDjokovic (7-6(4) 6-2) – See score progression
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Jan-Lennard StruffStruff (7-6(5) 7-6(7)) – See score progression
- Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime – Quentin HalysHalys (4-6 6-4 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Zizou BergsBergs – Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut (6-4 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Karen KhachanovKhachanov (4-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Andrey RublevRublev – Alexander BublikBublik (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (7-6(6) 6-3) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Alex De MinaurDe Minaur (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Jack DraperDraper (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey RublevRublev – Nuno BorgesBorges (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zizou BergsBergs – Daniil MedvedevMedvedev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Jiri LeheckaLehecka (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia – (0-0) – H2H and prediction