Daniel Evans and Stuart Parker will fight against each other in the 1^st round of the Glasgow Challenger for the 1^st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 6:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Evans who should win in 2 sets.

As per the initial odds, Daniel Evans is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Evans -> 1.21
Stuart Parker -> 4.05

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Daniel Evans vs. Stuart Parker

There is no head to head record between Daniel Evans and Stuart Parker since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.

Daniel Evans

Ranked no. 167, Evans will start his run in the Glasgow Challenger after he played his last match in the Manama Challenger where he lost 4-6 7-5 7-5 to Holt in the 2^nd round on the 12^th of February.

Daniel has a compiled 2-5 win-loss record in 2025, 0-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).

Talking about his overall career, The Brit has an overall 578-386 record. He has a positive 168-99 record on indoor hard courts.

Previously in the Glasgow Challenger

Previously, his best result was reaching the 1^st round in 2018. See his history.

Stuart Parker

Ranked no. 585, the Brit reached the 1^st round after beating Milos Karol 3-6 6-2 6-2 and Max Wiskandt 2-6 6-4 6-4.

In the qualifications against Wiskandt, Parker recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-4 6-4). During the match Parker and Wiskandt scored the same amount of points (93). However, the world no. 167 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Parker was very aggressive to blast 40 winners.

Talking about serving, Parker struck 9 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Stuart Parker lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Parker put 67% of his first serves in, winning 71% (40/56) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (13/27) on the 2nd serve. Parker broke Wiskandt twice after converting 22% of his break points (2/9).

Overall Performance in this tournament

The Brit started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.

Parker has a composed 4-3 win-loss record in 2025, 4-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Glasgow Challenger

Previously, his best result was reaching the 2^nd round in 2024. See his history.

Tennis Scores in Glasgow Challenger

• Matteo MartineauMartineau – Clement ChidekhChidekh (6-4 7-6³) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Constant LestienneLestienne – Henry SearleSearle (7-5 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Johannus MondayMonday – Rei SakamotoSakamoto (7-6⁶ 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings

Upcoming matches in the draw

• Christoph NegrituNegritu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – James StoryStory (0-1) – H2H and prediction
• Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Daniel MasurMasur (2-1) – H2H and prediction
• Benjamin HassanHassan – Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio (1-0) – H2H and prediction
• Stuart ParkerParker – Daniel EvansEvans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Liam DraxlDraxl – Adrian AndreevAndreev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Remy BertolaBertola (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Philip HenningHenning (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Harry WendelkenWendelken – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Micah BraswellBraswell – (0-0) – H2H and prediction