Micah Braswell and Daniel Cukierman will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Glasgow Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:00 pm on COURT 4. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Micah Braswell who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Micah Braswell is the pick to win this match.
Micah Braswell -> 1.33
Daniel Cukierman -> 3.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Micah Braswell vs. Daniel Cukierman
There is no head to head record between Micah Braswell and Daniel Cukierman since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Micah Braswell
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 29-14 | 17-8 | 0-0 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 7-6 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 6-2 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 425, Micah got to the qualifications after defeating Patrick Brady 7-5 7-5.
In the qualifications, Micah had a good straight sets win against Brady (7-5 7-5). During the match, Braswell scored 81 points vs Brady’s 69. Micah was extremely aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about the service games, Braswell struck 6 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults. Overall, Micah Braswell was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 71% (40/56) of his 1st serve and 53% (9/17) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The American broke Brady 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Braswell has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 62% of his matches (53-32). 8-4 on indoor hard courts in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Braswell has an overall22-11 win-loss record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
Micah’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in M15 Bressuire and M25 Sunderland.
Micah has an aggregate 8-4 win-loss record in 2025, 8-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Glasgow Challenger
Braswell has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniel Cukierman
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 21-18 | 5-5 | 16-11 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-25 | 17-11 | 6-5 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 49-28 | 39-14 | 5-7 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-13 | 3-4 | 20-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 563, Daniel got to the qualifications after defeating Norbert Gombos 6-3 3-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Israeli defeated Gombos (6-3 3-6 6-3). During the match Cukierman scored 84 points vs Gombos’s 77. Cukierman was quite aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about serving, Cukierman managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Daniel Cukierman lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Cukierman put 63% of his first serves in, winning 81% (42/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (15/31) on the 2nd serve. Daniel was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Gombos twice.
Cukierman has an aggregate 1-3 win-loss record in 2025, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Braswell | Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 24 | 27 |
| Pts | 81-69 | 84-77 |
| Total Points | 150 | 161 |
| Winners | 40 | 42 |
| %Winners | 49% | 50% |
Both Braswell and Cukierman played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Daniel Cukierman surrendered 1 set while Micah Braswell hasn’t dropped a set so far. Braswell has played 1 set(s) less than Cukierman (2 vs 3). Therefore, Braswell played 3 games less than Cukierman. Micah scored 40 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Cukierman blasted 42 winners (50%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Braswell | Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 3 |
| 1st in | 56/73 | 52/83 |
| %1st in | 77% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 40/56 | 42/52 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 15/31 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 48% |
Braswell struck 6 aces . Cukierman blasted 3 aces . Braswell won 71% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Cukierman won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Braswell | Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 2/2 |
| % Converted | 44% | 100% |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 |
| Saved | 0 | 1 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Micah broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. The American lost his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The Israeli broke his opponent twice with a 100% conversion rate. The Israeli conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Braswell | |||
| Q1 Brady |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 81-69 | 81-69 | |
| Total points | 150 | 150 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 56/73 | 56/73 | |
| % 1st in | 77% | 77% | |
| 1st pts | 40/56 | 40/56 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 9/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Cukierman | |||
| Q1 Gombos |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 84-77 | 84-77 | |
| Total points | 161 | 161 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 50% | 50% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 52/83 | 52/83 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 42/52 | 42/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/31 | 15/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 2/2 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLLWWWLWW
LLWLWLWLLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Constant LestienneLestienne – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christoph NegrituNegritu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Daniel MasurMasur (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel CukiermanCukierman – Micah BraswellBraswell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Finn BassBass – Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stuart ParkerParker – (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alastair GrayGray – James StoryStory (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Adrian AndreevAndreev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – Matteo MartineauMartineau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Remy BertolaBertola (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Philip HenningHenning (0-0) – H2H and prediction
