The recent announcement by the US Open organizers to revamp the mixed doubles format has sparked significant controversy among players and fans alike. The new scheduling, which positions the mixed doubles event as a standalone competition in the week preceding the main singles draws, has been met with criticism from various quarters. The tournament will now feature 16 teams, with eight teams earning direct entry based on their combined singles ranking and the remaining eight teams being wild-card entrants. Matches will be played over two days, with sets abbreviated to four games and no-advantage scoring, culminating in a 10-point match tiebreak in lieu of a third set.
Sara Errani and Andrea Vavassori, the reigning US Open mixed doubles champions, have been vocal in their opposition to these changes. They argue that the new format undermines the integrity of the competition and disrespects the players who specialize in doubles. In a statement on social media, Errani and Vavassori described the decision as a “profound injustice” that prioritizes profit over the sport’s traditions and values. They expressed concern that the new format, which they view as a pseudo-exhibition focused on entertainment, diminishes the significance of the mixed doubles title.
The champions also highlighted the lack of consultation with players before implementing these changes. They emphasized the importance of tradition and history in tennis, noting that winning the US Open mixed doubles title was one of the greatest moments in their careers. The opportunity to defend their title and see their names engraved on the trophy board is a cherished aspect of the sport that they fear may be lost under the new format.
Critics of the new scheduling argue that it devalues the mixed doubles event and limits opportunities for doubles specialists. The decision to base direct entry on singles rankings rather than doubles rankings has been particularly contentious.