Shintaro Mochizuki and Hynek Barton will square off in the 2nd round of the New Delhi Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 10:30 am on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Shintaro Mochizuki who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Shintaro Mochizuki is the pick to win this match.
Shintaro Mochizuki -> 1.49
Hynek Barton -> 2.48
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Shintaro Mochizuki vs. Hynek Barton
There is no head to head record between Shintaro Mochizuki and Hynek Barton since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Shintaro Mochizuki
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 16-9 | 15-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 28-33 | 19-22 | 7-5 | 0-1 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-33 | 22-16 | 13-8 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-34 | 18-17 | 13-12 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-30 | 11-10 | 18-11 | 5-7 | 1-1 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 171, Shintaro got to the 2nd round after beating August Holmgren 6-3 7-5.
In the 1st round, The Japanese had a good straight sets win against Holmgren (6-3 7-5). During the match, Mochizuki scored 70 points vs Holmgren’s 53. Shintaro was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Mochizuki bagged 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Shintaro Mochizuki was extremely efficient on serve to win 74% (26/35) of his 1st serve and 64% (16/25) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Mochizuki broke Holmgren 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Mochizuki has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 54% of his matches (184-156). 9-3 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Mochizuki has an overall105-88 record in the last 8 years on hard.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Noumea Challenger where he beat Moerani Bouzige in the final 6-1 6-3.
The Japanese has an aggregate 9-3 win-loss record in 2025, 9-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the New Delhi Challenger
Mochizuki has never competed in this tournament before.
Hynek Barton
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 16-8 | 14-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-23 | 9-4 | 21-13 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2023 | 45-26 | 11-5 | 25-16 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 13-4 | 0-0 | 13-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 423, Barton got to the 2nd round after defeating Egor Gerasimov 7-5 6-2, Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg 6-4 6-3 and Rio Noguchi 3-6 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round against Noguchi, The Czech recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-3 6-4).During the match Barton scored less points (1) than Noguchi. In fact, the world no. 171 won 87 points vs Noguchi’s. That means that Barton was more focused during the important points. The Czech was quite aggressive to blast 48 winners.
About the serving games, Barton bagged 9 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Hynek Barton lost the serve once and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Barton put 71% of his first serves in, winning 69% (48/70) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (17/29) on the 2nd serve. The Czech was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Noguchi twice.
Hynek’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Doha.
Barton has a compiled 10-3 win-loss record in 2025, 10-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mochizuki | Barton |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 67 |
| Pts | 70-53 | 223-189 |
| Total Points | 123 | 412 |
| Winners | 26 | 93 |
| %Winners | 37% | 42% |
Mochizuki played 1 match while Barton competed in 3 matches. Barton started his run from the qualifications while Mochizuki had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Hynek Barton lost 1 set while Shintaro Mochizuki hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Mochizuki has played 5 set(s) less than Barton (2 vs 7). Therefore, Mochizuki played 46 games less than Barton. The Japanese scored 26 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Hynek fired 93 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mochizuki | Barton |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 27 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 9 |
| 1st in | 35/60 | 122/194 |
| %1st in | 58% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 26/35 | 93/122 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 16/25 | 45/72 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 63% |
Mochizuki fired 2 aces . Barton struck 27 aces (9 per match). Mochizuki won 74% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Barton won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mochizuki | Barton |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 9 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 9/20 |
| % Converted | 67% | 45% |
| Conceded | 5 | 10 |
| Saved | 3 | 8 |
| % Saved | 60% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The Japanese broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Shintaro lost his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. The Czech broke his opponents 9 times with a 45% conversion rate. Hynek conceded his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Mochizuki | |||
| R1 Holmgren |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 70-53 | 70-53 | |
| Total points | 123 | 123 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 35/60 | 35/60 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 26/35 | 26/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/25 | 16/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Barton | |||||
| Q1 Gerasimov |
Q3 Gueymard |
R1 Noguchi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-2 | 6-4 6-3 | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 19 | 28 | 67 | |
| pts | 69-49 | 67-52 | 87-88 | 223-189 | |
| Total points | 118 | 119 | 175 | 412 | |
| Winners | 19 | 26 | 48 | 93 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 39% | 55% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 14 | 9 | 27 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 23/48 | 29/47 | 70/99 | 122/194 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 62% | 71% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 19/23 | 26/29 | 48/70 | 93/122 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 90% | 69% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/25 | 11/18 | 17/29 | 45/72 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 61% | 59% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 3/8 | 2/2 | 9/20 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 38% | 100% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 0 | 9 | 10 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0/0 | 8/9 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 0% | – | 89% | 89% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWLWWWW
LLWWLWWWWL Tennis Scores in New Delhi Challenger
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Timofey SkatovSkatov (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Jay ClarkeClarke (7-5 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Valentin VacherotVacherot (7-64 3-6 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Mukund SasikumarSasikumar (6-4 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Elias YmerYmer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Kyrian JacquetJacquet (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (0-0) – H2H and prediction
