Hayden Jones and Arthur Weber will square off in the qualifications of the Brisbane 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 6. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Arthur Weber who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Arthur Weber is the pick to win this match.
Arthur Weber -> 1.81
Hayden Jones -> 1.92
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Hayden Jones vs. Arthur Weber
There is no head to head record between Hayden Jones and Arthur Weber since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Hayden Jones
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 10-20 | 10-18 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 10-13 | 8-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 3-8 | 3-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Hayden got to the qualifications after beating Yuki Mochizuki 6-1 4-6 6-1.
In the qualifications, Hayden defeated Mochizuki (6-1 4-6 6-1). During the match, Jones scored 85 points vs Mochizuki’s 63. Hayden was exceptionally aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Jones blasted 5 aces and he was pretty solid in conceding no double faults. Overall, Hayden Jones was pretty effective on serve to win 73% (30/41) of his 1st serve and 60% (21/35) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Australian broke Mochizuki 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Jones has a unfavourable match record in the last 4 years having won 36% of his matches (16-28). 1-3 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Jones has a composed14-22 win-loss record in the last 4 years on hard.
Jones has a compiled 1-3 win-loss record in 2025, 1-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brisbane 2 Challenger
Jones has never competed in this tournament before.
Arthur Weber
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3-7 | 3-3 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 34-23 | 30-17 | 3-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-22 | 33-17 | 0-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-11 | 18-5 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 552, Weber reached the qualifications after beating Shinji Hazawa 2-6 7-6(3) 7-5.
In the qualifications against Hazawa, Arthur recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 7-63 7-5).During the match Weber scored less points (4) than Hazawa. In fact, the world no. won 90 points vs Hazawa’s. That means that Weber was more focused during the important points. The French player was exceptionally aggressive to blast 41 winners.
About the serving games, Weber wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Arthur Weber lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Weber put 73% of his first serves in, winning 61% (41/67) of the points behind his 1st serve and 76% (19/25) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Hazawa twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
The French player has an aggregate 1-1 win-loss record in 2025, 1-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jones | Weber |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 24 | 33 |
| Pts | 85-63 | 90-94 |
| Total Points | 148 | 184 |
| Winners | 30 | 41 |
| %Winners | 35% | 46% |
Both Jones and Weber played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Hayden Jones dropped 1 set, while Arthur Weber lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Jones and Weber have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Jones played 9 games less than Weber. Jones scored 30 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Weber bagged 41 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jones | Weber |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 0 |
| 1st in | 41/76 | 67/92 |
| %1st in | 54% | 73% |
| 1st pts | 30/41 | 41/67 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 61% |
| 2nd pts | 21/35 | 19/25 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 76% |
Jones bagged 5 aces . Weber didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Jones won 73% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Weber won 61% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 76% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jones | Weber |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 2 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 2/5 |
| % Converted | 63% | 40% |
| Conceded | 4 | 5 |
| Saved | 3 | 2 |
| % Saved | 75% | 40% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Hayden broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Jones surrendered his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Arthur broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Weber conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded.
| Jones | |||
| Q1 Mochizuki |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 4-6 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 85-63 | 85-63 | |
| Total points | 148 | 148 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 41/76 | 41/76 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 30/41 | 30/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/35 | 21/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Weber | |||
| Q1 Hazawa |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 7-63 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 90-94 | 90-94 | |
| Total points | 184 | 184 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 67/92 | 67/92 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 41/67 | 41/67 | |
| % 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/25 | 19/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 76% | 76% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLLWWLL
LLLLLWLWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jake DelaneyDelaney – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Alex BoltBolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Blake EllisEllis – Omar JasikaJasika (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – Charles BroomBroom (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Masamichi ImamuraImamura – Bernard TomicTomic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Govind NandaNanda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moerani BouzigeBouzige – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hikaru ShiraishiShiraishi – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Christian LangmoLangmo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joshua CharltonCharlton – Kousuke OguraOgura (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur WeberWeber – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
