Tristan Schoolkate and Marek Gengel will square off in the final of the Brisbane 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 2:00 pm on PAT RAFTER ARENA. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tristan Schoolkate who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tristan Schoolkate is the pick to win this match.
Tristan Schoolkate -> 1.43
Marek Gengel -> 2.66
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Tristan Schoolkate vs. Marek Gengel
There is no head to head record between Tristan Schoolkate and Marek Gengel since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Tristan Schoolkate
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 12-8 | 12-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 44-33 | 38-24 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-30 | 30-23 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 8-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 48-29 | 24-15 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-20 | 8-9 | 3-5 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 147 (career-high), Tristan got to the final after defeating Yi Zhou 7-5 6-3, Matthew Dellavedova 6-2 7-6(6), Alex Bolt 6-3 7-5 and Adam Walton 4-6 6-3 7-6(5).
In the semifinal against Walton, The Australian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 7-65). During the match, Schoolkate scored 111 points vs Walton’s 104. The Australian was quite aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Regarding the service games, Schoolkate submerged his opponent with 20 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Overall, Tristan Schoolkate was exceptionally effective on serve to win 78% (51/65) of his 1st serve and 53% (23/43) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Tristan broke Walton twice after converting 17% of his break points (2/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Tristan has surrendered 1 set in this competition to win 55% of the points he played.
Schoolkate has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 59% of his matches (176-124). 6-3 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Schoolkate has an overall116-82 record in the last 7 years on hard.
Tristan’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Brisbane 1 Challenger.
Tristan has a compiled 6-3 win-loss record in 2025, 6-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brisbane 1 Challenger
Tristan has never competed in this tournament before.
Marek Gengel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 6-7 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 85-26 | 82-22 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-27 | 14-15 | 0-7 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 42-29 | 28-16 | 4-8 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 52-28 | 47-14 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 254 (career-high), Gengel got to the final after beating Naoki Nakagawa 6-4 6-3, Yuta Shimizu 3-6 6-4 6-0, Blake Ellis 6-4 3-6 7-5 and Omar Jasika 7-6(4) 6-3.
In the semifinal, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Jasika (7-64 6-3). During the match Gengel scored 84 points vs Jasika’s 74. Marek was pretty aggressive to blast 44 winners.
About the serving games, Gengel made 12 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Marek Gengel lost the serve once and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Gengel put 67% of his first serves in, winning 79% (44/56) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (13/27) on the 2nd serve. The Czech broke Jasika twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Marek has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Marek’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Brisbane 1 Challenger.
Marek has a composed 4-2 win-loss record in 2025, 4-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Schoolkate | Gengel |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 9 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 95 | 97 |
| Pts | 337-280 | 316-271 |
| Total Points | 617 | 587 |
| Winners | 143 | 155 |
| %Winners | 42% | 49% |
Both Schoolkate and Gengel played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Tristan Schoolkate dropped 1 set, while Marek Gengel dropped 2 sets. Schoolkate has played 1 set(s) less than Gengel (9 vs 10). Therefore, Schoolkate played 2 games less than Gengel. The Australian scored 143 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Marek blasted 155 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Schoolkate | Gengel |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 60 | 39 |
| Avg per match | 15 | 9.8 |
| 1st in | 171/289 | 194/280 |
| %1st in | 59% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 143/171 | 155/194 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 66/118 | 49/86 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 57% |
Schoolkate made 60 aces (15 per match). Gengel managed to score 39 aces (9.8 per match). Schoolkate won 84% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Gengel won 80% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Schoolkate | Gengel |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 10 |
| Converted | 10/31 | 10/25 |
| % Converted | 32% | 40% |
| Conceded | 14 | 17 |
| Saved | 11 | 13 |
| % Saved | 79% | 76% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
Schoolkate broke his opponents 10 times with a 32% conversion rate. The Australian lost his serve 3 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded. Marek broke his opponents 10 times with a 40% conversion rate. Gengel conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded.
| Schoolkate | ||||||
| R1 Zhou |
R2 Dellavedova |
1/4 Bolt |
1/2 Walton |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | 6-2 7-66 | 6-3 7-5 | 4-6 6-3 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | 21 | 32 | 95 | |
| pts | 69-55 | 75-54 | 82-67 | 111-104 | 337-280 | |
| Total points | 124 | 129 | 149 | 215 | 617 | |
| Winners | 31 | 32 | 29 | 51 | 143 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 43% | 35% | 46% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 13 | 13 | 14 | 20 | 60 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 19 | |
| 1st in | 36/58 | 34/56 | 36/67 | 65/108 | 171/289 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 61% | 54% | 60% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 31/36 | 32/34 | 29/36 | 51/65 | 143/171 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 94% | 81% | 78% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/22 | 12/22 | 17/31 | 23/43 | 66/118 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 55% | 55% | 53% | 56% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 10 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 3/4 | 3/9 | 2/12 | 10/31 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 75% | 33% | 17% | 32% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 14 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 0/1 | 1/1 | 7/9 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 0% | 100% | 78% | 70% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | |
| Gengel | ||||||
| R1 Nakagawa |
R2 Shimizu |
1/4 Ellis |
1/2 Jasika |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | 3-6 6-4 6-0 | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | 7-64 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 25 | 31 | 22 | 97 | |
| pts | 63-47 | 78-61 | 91-89 | 84-74 | 316-271 | |
| Total points | 110 | 139 | 180 | 158 | 587 | |
| Winners | 29 | 33 | 49 | 44 | 155 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 42% | 54% | 52% | 49% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 6 | 8 | 13 | 12 | 39 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 35/51 | 43/64 | 60/82 | 56/83 | 194/280 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 67% | 73% | 67% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 29/35 | 33/43 | 49/60 | 44/56 | 155/194 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 77% | 82% | 79% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/16 | 14/21 | 11/22 | 13/27 | 49/86 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 67% | 50% | 48% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 10 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 4/8 | 2/6 | 2/7 | 10/25 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | 33% | 29% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 4 | 3 | 10 | 17 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 2/4 | 2/3 | 9/10 | 13 | |
| Saved % | – | 50% | 67% | 90% | 52% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLLWWWL
LWLLLWLWWW Tennis Scores in Brisbane 1 Challenger
- Matthew Christopher Romios/Colin SinclairChristopher Romios/Colin Sinclair – Joshua Charlton/Patrick HarperCharlton/Patrick Harper (7-62 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marek GengelGengel – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (0-0) – H2H and prediction
