Omar Jasika and Marek Gengel will fight against each other in the semifinal of the Brisbane 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 1:30 pm on PAT RAFTER ARENA. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Omar Jasika who should win in 3 sets.
Omar Jasika -> 1.48
Marek Gengel -> 2.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Omar Jasika vs. Marek Gengel
There is no head to head record between Omar Jasika and Marek Gengel since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Omar Jasika
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 31-32 | 24-27 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 55-27 | 52-15 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-26 | 34-20 | 0-2 | 0-3 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 70-23 | 63-20 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 208, Jasika reached the semifinal after beating Jacob Bradshaw 6-3 6-1, Christian Langmo 7-5 7-5 and James McCabe 6-7(7) 6-2 7-5.
In the quarter against McCabe, Omar recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-77 6-2 7-5). During the match, Jasika scored 127 points vs McCabe’s 118. Jasika was extremely aggressive to blast 61 winners.
Regarding the service games, Jasika made 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Omar Jasika lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Jasika put 75% of his first serves in, winning 69% (61/89) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (12/30) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke McCabe 6 times after converting 35% of his break points (6/17).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Omar has lost 1 set in this tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Jasika has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 65% of his matches (221-120). 3-2 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Jasika has a composed 184-85 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Jasika has a compiled 3-2 win-loss record in 2025, 3-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brisbane 1 Challenger
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
Marek Gengel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 20-31 | 20-27 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 85-26 | 82-22 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-27 | 14-15 | 0-7 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 42-29 | 28-16 | 4-8 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 52-28 | 47-14 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 254 (career-high), Marek reached the semifinal after defeating Naoki Nakagawa 6-4 6-3, Yuta Shimizu 3-6 6-4 6-0 and Blake Ellis 6-4 3-6 7-5.
In the quarter, Gengel defeated Ellis (6-4 3-6 7-5). During the match Gengel scored 91 points vs Ellis’s 89. Marek was quite aggressive to blast 49 winners.
Talking about serving, Gengel scored 13 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Marek Gengel lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Gengel put 73% of his first serves in, winning 82% (49/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (11/22) on the 2nd serve. Gengel broke Ellis twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Czech has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Gengel has an aggregate 3-2 win-loss record in 2025, 3-2 on hard (See FULL STATS)
.H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jasika | Gengel |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 73 | 75 |
| Pts | 264-220 | 232-197 |
| Total Points | 484 | 429 |
| Winners | 132 | 111 |
| %Winners | 50% | 48% |
Both Jasika and Gengel played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Omar Jasika lost 1 set, while Marek Gengel conceded 2 sets. Jasika has played 1 set(s) less than Gengel (7 vs 8). Therefore, Jasika played 2 games less than Gengel. Omar scored 132 winners (50% of the total points). On the other side, Marek fired 111 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jasika | Gengel |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 22 | 27 |
| Avg per match | 7.3 | 9 |
| 1st in | 178/234 | 138/197 |
| %1st in | 76% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 132/178 | 111/138 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 28/56 | 36/59 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 61% |
Jasika recorded 22 aces (7.3 per match). Gengel made 27 aces (9 per match). Jasika won 74% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Gengel won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jasika | Gengel |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 12 | 8 |
| Converted | 12/33 | 8/18 |
| % Converted | 36% | 44% |
| Conceded | 14 | 7 |
| Saved | 11 | 4 |
| % Saved | 79% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
The Australian broke his opponents 12 times with a 36% conversion rate. The Australian lost his serve 3 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded. The Czech broke his opponents 8 times with a 44% conversion rate. Marek conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
| Jasika | |||||
| R1 Bradshaw | R2 Langmo | 1/4 McCabe | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | 7-5 7-5 | 6-77 6-2 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 24 | 33 | 73 | |
| pts | 61-38 | 76-64 | 127-118 | 264-220 | |
| Total points | 99 | 140 | 245 | 484 | |
| Winners | 28 | 43 | 61 | 132 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 57% | 48% | 50% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 15 | 5 | 22 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 33/47 | 56/68 | 89/119 | 178/234 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 82% | 75% | 76% | |
| 1st pts | 28/33 | 43/56 | 61/89 | 132/178 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 77% | 69% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/14 | 9/12 | 12/30 | 28/56 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 75% | 40% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 6 | 12 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 2/8 | 6/17 | 12/33 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 25% | 35% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 4 | 8 | 14 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 4/4 | 5/8 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 63% | 88% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
| Gengel | |||||
| R1 Nakagawa | R2 Shimizu | 1/4 Ellis | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | 3-6 6-4 6-0 | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 25 | 31 | 75 | |
| pts | 63-47 | 78-61 | 91-89 | 232-197 | |
| Total points | 110 | 139 | 180 | 429 | |
| Winners | 29 | 33 | 49 | 111 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 42% | 54% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 8 | 13 | 27 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 35/51 | 43/64 | 60/82 | 138/197 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 67% | 73% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 29/35 | 33/43 | 49/60 | 111/138 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 77% | 82% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/16 | 14/21 | 11/22 | 36/59 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 67% | 50% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 2 | 8 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 4/8 | 2/6 | 8/18 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | 33% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 2/4 | 2/3 | 4 | |
| Saved % | – | 50% | 67% | 39% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Brisbane 1 Challenger
- Matthew Christopher Romios/Colin SinclairChristopher Romios/Colin Sinclair – Blake Ellis/Adam WaltonEllis/Adam Walton (7-66 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Omar JasikaJasika – Marek GengelGengel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Adam WaltonWalton (2-3) – H2H and prediction