Tallon Griekspoor and Jesper De Jong will clash against each other in the quarter of the Open Occitanie for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 4:00 pm on COURT PATRICE DOMINGUEZ. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tallon Griekspoor who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tallon Griekspoor is the pick to win this match.
Tallon Griekspoor -> 1.39
Jesper De Jong -> 2.99
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Tallon Griekspoor vs. Jesper De Jong
There is no head to head record between Tallon Griekspoor and Jesper De Jong since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Tallon Griekspoor
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 8-5 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-30 | 10-11 | 8-8 | 11-8 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-24 | 14-10 | 3-5 | 12-7 | 7-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-27 | 5-6 | 12-6 | 4-11 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 59-17 | 11-3 | 36-10 | 9-3 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 46, Griekspoor reached the quarter after beating Botic Van De Zandschulp 7-5 6-3 and Richard Gasquet 6-3 3-6 7-5.
In the 2nd round, Griekspoor defeated Gasquet (6-3 3-6 7-5). During the match, Griekspoor scored 92 points vs Gasquet’s 90. Griekspoor was exceptionally aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Regarding the service games, Griekspoor bagged 18 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Tallon Griekspoor was quite efficient on serve to win 75% (51/68) of his 1st serve and 52% (15/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Griekspoor broke Gasquet twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Griekspoor has lost 1 set in this competition to win 52% of the points he played.
Griekspoor has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (335-196). 2-0 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Griekspoor has an overall 64-49 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
The Dutch has a compiled 2-1 win-loss record in 2025, 2-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Montpellier
Jesper De Jong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4-7 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 48-25 | 12-5 | 33-15 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-23 | 19-4 | 30-14 | 0-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-28 | 12-7 | 10-13 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-29 | 2-6 | 27-18 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 131, the Dutch reached the quarter after beating Quentin Halys 7-6(7) 2-0 ret. and Flavio Cobolli 6-3 7-6(2).
In the 2nd round, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Cobolli (6-3 7-62). During the match De scored 77 points vs Cobolli’s 59. Jesper was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
About the serving games, De managed to score 9 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Jesper De Jong was very efficient on serve to win 90% (27/30) of his 1st serve and 59% (20/34) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Dutch broke Cobolli twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
The Dutch has a compiled 2-3 win-loss record in 2025, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Montpellier
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Griekspoor | De |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 51 | 37 |
| Pts | 165-151 | 131-102 |
| Total Points | 316 | 233 |
| Winners | 85 | 48 |
| %Winners | 52% | 37% |
Both Griekspoor and De played 2 matches. At the moment, Tallon Griekspoor surrendered 1 set while Jesper De Jong hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Talking about their workload, Griekspoor and De have played the same amount of sets 5. However, Griekspoor played 14 games more than De. Tallon scored 85 winners (52% of the total points). On the other side, De made 48 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Griekspoor | De |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 26 | 15 |
| Avg per match | 13 | 7.5 |
| 1st in | 115/174 | 55/110 |
| %1st in | 66% | 50% |
| 1st pts | 85/115 | 48/55 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 87% |
| 2nd pts | 28/59 | 35/55 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 64% |
Griekspoor fired 26 aces (13 per match). De made 15 aces (7.5 per match). Griekspoor won 74% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, De won 87% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Griekspoor | De |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 3 |
| Converted | 6/9 | 3/8 |
| % Converted | 67% | 38% |
| Conceded | 16 | 4 |
| Saved | 13 | 3 |
| % Saved | 81% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
The Dutch broke his opponents 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. Tallon lost his serve 3 times and he saved 81% of the break points that he conceded. De broke his opponents 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Griekspoor | ||||
| R1 Van De Zandschulp |
R2 Gasquet |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 30 | 51 | |
| pts | 73-61 | 92-90 | 165-151 | |
| Total points | 134 | 182 | 316 | |
| Winners | 34 | 51 | 85 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 55% | 52% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 18 | 26 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 47/77 | 68/97 | 115/174 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 70% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 34/47 | 51/68 | 85/115 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 75% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/30 | 15/29 | 28/59 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 52% | 47% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 2/5 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 40% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 9 | 16 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 8/9 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 89% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| De | ||||
| R1 Halys |
R2 Cobolli |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-67 2-0 ret. | 6-3 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 22 | 37 | |
| pts | 54-43 | 77-59 | 131-102 | |
| Total points | 97 | 136 | 233 | |
| Winners | 21 | 27 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 35% | 37% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 9 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 25/46 | 30/64 | 55/110 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 47% | 50% | |
| 1st pts | 21/25 | 27/30 | 48/55 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 90% | 87% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/21 | 20/34 | 35/55 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 59% | 64% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Converted | 1/2 | 2/6 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 33% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | – | 75% | 38% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWWWLWLWL
LLLWLWWWLL Tennis Scores in Montpellier
- Robin Haase/Botic Van de ZandschulpHaase/Botic Van de Zandschulp – Sadio Doumbia/Fabien ReboulDoumbia/Fabien Reboul (7-64 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Manuel Guinard/Gregoire JacqGuinard/Gregoire Jacq – Yuki Bhambri/Ivan DodigBhambri/Ivan Dodig (6-4 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tallon Griekspoor/Bart StevensGriekspoor/Bart Stevens – Constantin Frantzen/Hendrik JebensFrantzen/Hendrik Jebens (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alexander BublikBublik – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey RublevRublev – Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili (3-3) – H2H and prediction
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Jesper De JongDe Jong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime (0-0) – H2H and prediction
