Eliot Spizzirri and Michael Mmoh will face off in the 2nd round of the Cleveland Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 4:00 pm on STADIUM. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Eliot Spizzirri who should win in 3 sets.
Eliot Spizzirri -> 1.53
Michael Mmoh -> 2.375
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Eliot Spizzirri vs. Michael Mmoh
There is no head to head record between Eliot Spizzirri and Michael Mmoh since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Eliot Spizzirri
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 21-14 | 10-7 | 7-6 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 35-17 | 28-11 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 9-10 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 15-4 | 15-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 222 (career-high), Spizzirri got to the 2nd round after defeating Ernesto Escobedo 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, Eliot had a good straight sets win against Escobedo (6-4 6-3). During the match, Spizzirri scored 64 points vs Escobedo’s 45. Eliot was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about the service games, Spizzirri scored 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Eliot Spizzirri was extremely effective on serve to win 81% (21/26) of his 1st serve and 71% (12/17) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Eliot broke Escobedo 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Spizzirri has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 61% of his matches (67-42). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Spizzirri has a compiled11-8 record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
The American has an overall 3-2 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cleveland Challenger
Spizzirri has never competed in this tournament before.
Michael Mmoh
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 12-10 | 5-4 | 3-4 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 8-12 | 3-7 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 31-21 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 44-29 | 18-12 | 8-7 | 17-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 19-18 | 14-11 | 2-3 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 333, Mmoh reached the 2nd round after defeating Alex Rybakov 6-7(3) 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round against Rybakov, Mmoh recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-73 6-3 6-2). During the match Mmoh scored 96 points vs Rybakov’s 83. Mmoh was extremely aggressive to blast 52 winners.
Talking about serving, Mmoh made 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Michael Mmoh was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 76% (52/68) of his 1st serve and 52% (16/31) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Rybakov 3 times.
The American has a composed 1-0 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Spizzirri | Mmoh |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 19 | 30 |
Pts | 64-45 | 96-83 |
Total Points | 109 | 179 |
Winners | 21 | 52 |
%Winners | 33% | 54% |
Both Spizzirri and Mmoh played 1 match. At the moment, Michael Mmoh dropped 1 set while Eliot Spizzirri hasn’t dropped a set so far. Spizzirri has played 1 set(s) less than Mmoh (2 vs 3). Therefore, Spizzirri played 11 games less than Mmoh. Eliot scored 21 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, The American recorded 52 winners (54%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Spizzirri | Mmoh |
---|---|---|
Aces | 4 | 6 |
Avg per match | 4 | 6 |
1st in | 26/43 | 68/99 |
%1st in | 60% | 69% |
1st pts | 21/26 | 52/68 |
%1st pts | 81% | 76% |
2nd pts | 12/17 | 16/31 |
%2nd pts | 71% | 52% |
Spizzirri recorded 4 aces . Mmoh struck 6 aces . Spizzirri won 81% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 71% of the points. On the other side, Mmoh won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Spizzirri | Mmoh |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 3 |
Converted | 4/9 | 3/3 |
% Converted | 44% | 100% |
Conceded | 2 | 5 |
Saved | 1 | 5 |
% Saved | 50% | 100% |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Spizzirri broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Spizzirri dropped his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Michael broke his opponent 3 times with a 100% conversion rate. Michael was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 5 break points.
Spizzirri | |||
R1 Escobedo | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 64-45 | 64-45 | |
Total points | 109 | 109 | |
Winners | 21 | 21 | |
%Winners | 33% | 33% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 26/43 | 26/43 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
1st pts | 21/26 | 21/26 | |
% 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
2nd pts | 12/17 | 12/17 | |
% 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Mmoh | |||
R1 Rybakov | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-73 6-3 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
pts | 96-83 | 96-83 | |
Total points | 179 | 179 | |
Winners | 52 | 52 | |
%Winners | 54% | 54% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 68/99 | 68/99 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
1st pts | 52/68 | 52/68 | |
% 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 16/31 | 16/31 | |
% 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/3 | 3/3 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Tennis Scores in Cleveland Challenger
- Jeff WolfWolf – Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Colton SmithSmith – Ethan QuinnQuinn (1-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Alex RybakovRybakov (6-73 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Juan Carlos Manuel AguilarCarlos Manuel Aguilar – Jackson RossRoss (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Stefan DostanicDostanic – Ryan SeggermanSeggerman (7-68 7-5) – See score progression
- Karue SellSell – Alafia AyeniAyeni (6-3 7-65) – See score progression
- Kaylan BigunBigun – Radu AlbotAlbot (6-3 7-67) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Micah BraswellBraswell (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo – Tristan MccormickMccormick (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Trey HilderbrandHilderbrand – Nathan PonwithPonwith (7-65 4-6 6-0) – See score progression
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Filip PieczonkaPieczonka (6-3 3-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Kalin IvanovskiIvanovski (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Tyler ZinkZink – Aidan MayoMayo (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Stefan DostanicDostanic – Ryan SeggermanSeggerman (7-6(8) 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Karue SellSell – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Trey HilderbrandHilderbrand (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan DostanicDostanic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tyler ZinkZink – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction