Yuta Shimizu and Marek Gengel will face off in the 2nd round of the Brisbane 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 12:30 pm on SHOW COURT 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Yuta Shimizu who should win in 3 sets.
Yuta Shimizu -> 1.49
Marek Gengel -> 2.48
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Yuta Shimizu vs. Marek Gengel
There is no head to head record between Yuta Shimizu and Marek Gengel since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Yuta Shimizu
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 21-25 | 17-18 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-29 | 35-25 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-24 | 35-23 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-23 | 36-21 | 7-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-12 | 12-8 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 1-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 196, Yuta got to the 2nd round after defeating Masamichi Imamura 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Yuta had a good straight sets win against Imamura (6-4 6-4). During the match, Shimizu scored 77 points vs Imamura’s 67. Shimizu was exceptionally aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Shimizu managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Yuta Shimizu lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Shimizu put 67% of his first serves in, winning 67% (32/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 58% (14/24) on the 2nd serve. Shimizu broke Imamura 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Shimizu has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (259-147). 2-3 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Shimizu has a composed 205-117 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Shimizu has an overall 2-3 win-loss record in 2025, 2-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brisbane 1 Challenger
The Japanese has never competed in this tournament before.
Marek Gengel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 20-31 | 20-27 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 85-26 | 82-22 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-27 | 14-15 | 0-7 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 42-29 | 28-16 | 4-8 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 52-28 | 47-14 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 254 (career-high), the Czech got to the 2nd round after defeating Naoki Nakagawa 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Nakagawa (6-4 6-3). During the match Gengel scored 63 points vs Nakagawa’s 47. The Czech was very aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Gengel recorded 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Marek Gengel was exceptionally effective on serve to win 83% (29/35) of his 1st serve and 69% (11/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Czech broke Nakagawa twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Marek has a compiled 1-2 win-loss record in 2025, 1-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Shimizu | Gengel |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 19 |
| Pts | 77-67 | 63-47 |
| Total Points | 144 | 110 |
| Winners | 32 | 29 |
| %Winners | 42% | 46% |
Both Shimizu and Gengel played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Shimizu and Gengel have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Shimizu played 1 game more than Gengel. Yuta scored 32 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Gengel blasted 29 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Shimizu | Gengel |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 6 |
| 1st in | 48/72 | 35/51 |
| %1st in | 67% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 32/48 | 29/35 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 14/24 | 11/16 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 69% |
Shimizu made 3 aces . Gengel made 6 aces . Shimizu won 67% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Gengel won 83% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 69% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Shimizu | Gengel |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 2 |
| Converted | 3/8 | 2/4 |
| % Converted | 38% | 50% |
| Conceded | 5 | 0 |
| Saved | 4 | 0 |
| % Saved | 80% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Shimizu broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. Shimizu dropped his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Marek broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. Gengel was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Shimizu | |||
| R1 Imamura | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 77-67 | 77-67 | |
| Total points | 144 | 144 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 48/72 | 48/72 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 32/48 | 32/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/24 | 14/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Gengel | |||
| R1 Nakagawa | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 63-47 | 63-47 | |
| Total points | 110 | 110 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 35/51 | 35/51 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 29/35 | 29/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/16 | 11/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 69% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores in Brisbane 1 Challenger
- Omar JasikaJasika – Christian LangmoLangmo (7-5 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Adam WaltonWalton – Shinji HazawaHazawa (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- James McCabeMcCabe – Rinky HijikataHijikata (6-4 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Bernard TomicTomic – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (6-3 6-76 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Adam WaltonWalton (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Blake EllisEllis – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – Alex BoltBolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova (3-1) – H2H and prediction