Brandon Holt and Tyler Zink will face off in the 2nd round of the Cleveland Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on COURT 4. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Brandon Holt who should win in 2 sets.
Brandon Holt -> 1.22
Tyler Zink -> 3.92
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Brandon Holt vs. Tyler Zink
There is no head to head record between Brandon Holt and Tyler Zink since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Brandon Holt
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 44-30 | 32-18 | 0-2 | 5-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 43-31 | 37-24 | 1-1 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-24 | 14-16 | 1-2 | 7-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 52-21 | 48-17 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 181, Holt got to the 2nd round after defeating Kalin Ivanovski 6-1 6-1.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Ivanovski (6-1 6-1). During the match, Holt scored 62 points vs Ivanovski’s 35. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Holt made 4 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults. Brandon Holt conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Holt put 72% of his first serves in, winning 67% (26/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 60% (9/15) on the 2nd serve. Brandon broke Ivanovski 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Holt has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (183-118). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Holt has an overall 16-14 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger where he defeated Vit Kopriva in the final 6-3 6-2.
The American has an aggregate 8-2 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cleveland Challenger
Tyler Zink
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37-31 | 13-14 | 15-9 | 8-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-12 | 13-7 | 9-1 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 4-10 | 1-2 | 3-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-14 | 11-11 | 4-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 6-9 | 6-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 473 (career-high), Zink reached the 2nd round after beating Aidan Mayo 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Tyler had a good straight sets win against Mayo (6-3 6-4). During the match Zink scored 57 points vs Mayo’s 42. The American was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Zink managed to score 4 aces and he was exceptionally consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Tyler Zink was pretty efficient on serve to win 80% (28/35) of his 1st serve and 80% (12/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Tyler broke Mayo twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
The American’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Ithaca.
Tyler has a compiled 4-1 win-loss record in 2025, 4-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Holt | Zink |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 14 | 19 |
| Pts | 62-35 | 57-42 |
| Total Points | 97 | 99 |
| Winners | 26 | 28 |
| %Winners | 42% | 49% |
Both Holt and Zink played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Holt and Zink have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Holt played 5 games less than Zink. Brandon scored 26 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The American struck 28 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Holt | Zink |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 4 |
| 1st in | 39/54 | 35/50 |
| %1st in | 72% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 26/39 | 28/35 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 9/15 | 12/15 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 80% |
Holt struck 4 aces . Zink struck 4 aces . Holt won 67% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Zink won 80% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 80% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Holt | Zink |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 2 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 2/3 |
| % Converted | 63% | 67% |
| Conceded | 2 | 0 |
| Saved | 2 | 0 |
| % Saved | 100% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Holt broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Holt pretty effective on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points. Zink broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. Tyler was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Holt | |||
| R1 Ivanovski | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 62-35 | 62-35 | |
| Total points | 97 | 97 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 39/54 | 39/54 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 26/39 | 26/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/15 | 9/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Zink | |||
| R1 Mayo | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 57-42 | 57-42 | |
| Total points | 99 | 99 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 35/50 | 35/50 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 28/35 | 28/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/15 | 12/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 80% | 80% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores in Cleveland Challenger
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Micah BraswellBraswell (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Kaylan BigunBigun – Radu AlbotAlbot (6-3 7-67) – See score progression
- Colton SmithSmith – Ethan QuinnQuinn (1-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Filip PieczonkaPieczonka (6-3 3-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Juan Carlos Manuel AguilarCarlos Manuel Aguilar – Jackson RossRoss (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Alex RybakovRybakov (6-73 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Trey HilderbrandHilderbrand – Nathan PonwithPonwith (7-65 4-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo – Tristan MccormickMccormick (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Kalin IvanovskiIvanovski (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Tyler ZinkZink – Aidan MayoMayo (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Trey HilderbrandHilderbrand – Nathan PonwithPonwith (7-6(5) 4-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Alex RybakovRybakov (6-7(3) 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Karue SellSell – Alafia AyeniAyeni (6-3 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Colton SmithSmith – Ethan QuinnQuinn (1-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo – Tristan MccormickMccormick (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Micah BraswellBraswell (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Kaylan BigunBigun – Radu AlbotAlbot (6-3 7-6(7)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Karue SellSell – Alafia AyeniAyeni (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Stefan DostanicDostanic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Trey HilderbrandHilderbrand (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tyler ZinkZink – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction