Maxime Chazal and Mariano Kestelboim will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Piracicaba Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:00 pm on QUADRA 6. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Maxime Chazal who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Maxime Chazal is the pick to win this match.
Maxime Chazal -> 1.68
Mariano Kestelboim -> 2.08
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Maxime Chazal vs. Mariano Kestelboim
There is no head to head record between Maxime Chazal and Mariano Kestelboim since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Maxime Chazal
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-26 | 0-3 | 39-17 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-29 | 13-10 | 31-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-27 | 3-2 | 35-25 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 9-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 338, the French player got to the qualifications after defeating Gabriel Roveri Sidney 6-0 6-2.
In the qualifications, Maxime had a good straight sets win against Roveri Sidney (6-0 6-2). During the match, Chazal scored 52 points vs Roveri Sidney’s 23. Maxime was exceptionally aggressive to blast 15 winners.
Regarding the service games, Chazal recorded 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Maxime Chazal was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 79% (15/19) of his 1st serve and 87% (13/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Maxime broke Roveri Sidney 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Chazal has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (302-205). 5-2 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Chazal has a compiled 282-173 record in the last years on clay.
The French player has a compiled 5-2 win-loss record in 2025, 5-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Piracicaba Challenger
Chazal has never competed in this tournament before.
Mariano Kestelboim
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 13-8 | 0-0 | 13-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 32-20 | 2-1 | 30-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 20-11 | 2-1 | 18-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-14 | 0-0 | 15-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-23 | 1-4 | 21-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 483, the Argentine reached the qualifications after beating Victor Hugo Remondy Pagotto 6-0 6-4.
In the qualifications, Kestelboim had a good straight sets win against Hugo Remondy Pagotto (6-0 6-4). During the match Kestelboim scored 68 points vs Hugo Remondy Pagotto’s 41. Kestelboim was extremely aggressive to blast 22 winners.
About the serving games, Kestelboim scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Mariano Kestelboim was extremely effective on serve to win 81% (22/27) of his 1st serve and 80% (8/10) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Argentine broke Hugo Remondy Pagotto 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
The Argentine has an aggregate 3-2 win-loss record in 2025, 3-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Piracicaba Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Chazal | Kestelboim |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 14 | 16 |
| Pts | 52-23 | 68-41 |
| Total Points | 75 | 109 |
| Winners | 15 | 22 |
| %Winners | 29% | 32% |
Both Chazal and Kestelboim played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Chazal and Kestelboim have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Chazal played 2 games less than Kestelboim. Chazal scored 15 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, Mariano managed to score 22 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Chazal | Kestelboim |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 1 |
| 1st in | 19/34 | 27/37 |
| %1st in | 56% | 73% |
| 1st pts | 15/19 | 22/27 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 13/15 | 8/10 |
| %2nd pts | 87% | 80% |
Chazal struck 2 aces . Kestelboim fired 1 ace . Chazal won 79% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 87% of the points. On the other side, Kestelboim won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 80% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Chazal | Kestelboim |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/13 |
| % Converted | 63% | 38% |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 |
| Saved | 0 | 1 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Chazal broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. The French player quite strong on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. Kestelboim broke his opponent 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Argentine conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Chazal | |||
| Q1 Roveri Sidney |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 52-23 | 52-23 | |
| Total points | 75 | 75 | |
| Winners | 15 | 15 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 19/34 | 19/34 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 15/19 | 15/19 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/15 | 13/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 87% | 87% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Kestelboim | |||
| Q1 Hugo Remondy Pagotto |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 68-41 | 68-41 | |
| Total points | 109 | 109 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 27/37 | 27/37 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 22/27 | 22/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/10 | 8/10 | |
| % 2nd pts | 80% | 80% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWLWWWL
LWWWLLWWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Maxime ChazalChazal – Mariano KestelboimKestelboim (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – Facundo MenaMena (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Eduardo RibeiroRibeiro – (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alex Marti PujolrasMarti Pujolras – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max HoukesHoukes – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
