Pranav Kumar and Tristan Mccormick will square off in the qualifications of the Cleveland Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 4. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tristan Mccormick who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tristan Mccormick is the pick to win this match.
Tristan Mccormick -> 1.26
Pranav Kumar -> 3.55
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Pranav Kumar vs. Tristan Mccormick
There is no head to head record between Pranav Kumar and Tristan Mccormick since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Pranav Kumar
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 9-10 | 8-8 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 19-19 | 8-9 | 10-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 7-11 | 5-7 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 9-5 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Pranav got to the qualifications after defeating Maxwell Mckennon 7-6(2) 7-6(3).
In the qualifications, Pranav had a good straight sets win against Mckennon (7-62 7-63). During the match, Kumar scored 91 points vs Mckennon’s 82. Pranav was very aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kumar recorded 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Pranav Kumar was exceptionally effective on serve to win 78% (36/46) of his 1st serve and 51% (23/45) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The American broke Mckennon twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Kumar has a winning record in the last 4 years having won 51% of his matches (36-35). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Kumar has an aggregate4-5 record in the last 4 years on indoor hard courts.
Pranav has a compiled 1-0 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cleveland Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Tristan Mccormick
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 23-21 | 8-9 | 11-10 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-32 | 9-11 | 17-17 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-20 | 4-7 | 14-8 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 22-11 | 13-5 | 7-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-6 | 14-3 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 704, the American got to the qualifications after beating Jaden Weekes 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, Tristan had a good straight sets win against Weekes (6-2 6-4). During the match Mccormick scored 64 points vs Weekes’s 46. The American was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Mccormick fired 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Tristan Mccormick conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 1 break points. Furthermore, Mccormick put 70% of his first serves in, winning 91% (30/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (7/14) on the 2nd serve. Mccormick broke Weekes 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Tristan has an aggregate 2-1 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cleveland Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kumar | Mccormick |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 18 |
| Pts | 91-82 | 64-46 |
| Total Points | 173 | 110 |
| Winners | 36 | 30 |
| %Winners | 40% | 47% |
Both Kumar and Mccormick played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Kumar and Mccormick have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Kumar played 8 games more than Mccormick. The American scored 36 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The American made 30 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kumar | Mccormick |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 3 |
| 1st in | 46/91 | 33/47 |
| %1st in | 51% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 36/46 | 30/33 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 91% |
| 2nd pts | 23/45 | 7/14 |
| %2nd pts | 51% | 50% |
Kumar managed to score 8 aces . Mccormick made 3 aces . Kumar won 78% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Mccormick won 91% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kumar | Mccormick |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 3 |
| Converted | 2/6 | 3/7 |
| % Converted | 33% | 43% |
| Conceded | 7 | 1 |
| Saved | 5 | 1 |
| % Saved | 71% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Pranav broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. Pranav conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Mccormick broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Tristan was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Kumar | |||
| Q1 Mckennon |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 91-82 | 91-82 | |
| Total points | 173 | 173 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 46/91 | 46/91 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 36/46 | 36/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/45 | 23/45 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Mccormick | |||
| Q1 Weekes |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 64-46 | 64-46 | |
| Total points | 110 | 110 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 33/47 | 33/47 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 30/33 | 30/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 91% | 91% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/14 | 7/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWLLWWL
WWLWWLLWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Karue SellSell – Alafia AyeniAyeni (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Nathan PonwithPonwith (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Noah SchachterSchachter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Stefan DostanicDostanic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan MccormickMccormick – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Micah BraswellBraswell – Stefan KozlovKozlov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
