Matthew Hulme and Jesse Delaney will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Brisbane 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 6. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Matthew Hulme who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Matthew Hulme is the pick to win this match.
Matthew Hulme -> 1.53
Jesse Delaney -> 2.375
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Matthew Hulme vs. Jesse Delaney
There is no head to head record between Matthew Hulme and Jesse Delaney since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Matthew Hulme
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 11-13 | 10-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 27-24 | 24-20 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 18-21 | 13-13 | 5-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 11-11 | 11-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 809, the Australian got to the qualifications after defeating Joshua Sheehy 7-6(4) 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Sheehy (7-64 6-4). During the match, Hulme scored 78 points vs Sheehy’s 67. Matthew was exceptionally aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about the service games, Hulme fired 6 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults. Matthew Hulme lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Hulme put 73% of his first serves in, winning 74% (40/54) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (10/20) on the 2nd serve. Hulme broke Sheehy twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Hulme has won exactly 50% of his matches (57-57) in the last 4 years. 1-1 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Hulme has a compiled49-45 win-loss record in the last 4 years on hard.
The Australian has a composed 1-1 win-loss record in 2025, 1-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brisbane 1 Challenger
Matthew has never competed in this tournament before.
Jesse Delaney
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 15-21 | 13-18 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 24-32 | 20-27 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-26 | 19-22 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-14 | 15-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 890, Delaney reached the qualifications after defeating Hikaru Shiraishi 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Shiraishi (6-4 6-2). During the match Delaney scored 57 points vs Shiraishi’s 46. Jesse was exceptionally aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Delaney recorded 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Jesse Delaney lost the serve once and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Delaney put 61% of his first serves in, winning 66% (23/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 64% (14/22) on the 2nd serve. Delaney broke Shiraishi 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Delaney has a compiled 1-1 win-loss record in 2025, 1-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Hulme | Delaney |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 18 |
| Pts | 78-67 | 57-46 |
| Total Points | 145 | 103 |
| Winners | 40 | 23 |
| %Winners | 51% | 40% |
Both Hulme and Delaney played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Hulme and Delaney have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Hulme played 5 games more than Delaney. Matthew scored 40 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian struck 23 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Hulme | Delaney |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 3 |
| 1st in | 54/74 | 35/57 |
| %1st in | 73% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 40/54 | 23/35 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 10/20 | 14/22 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 64% |
Hulme scored 6 aces . Delaney struck 3 aces . Hulme won 74% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Delaney won 66% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Hulme | Delaney |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 4 |
| Converted | 2/7 | 4/5 |
| % Converted | 29% | 80% |
| Conceded | 4 | 8 |
| Saved | 3 | 7 |
| % Saved | 75% | 88% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
The Australian broke his opponent twice with a 29% conversion rate. Hulme dropped his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Jesse broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Delaney conceded his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded.
| Hulme | |||
| Q1 Sheehy |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 78-67 | 78-67 | |
| Total points | 145 | 145 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 54/74 | 54/74 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 40/54 | 40/54 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/20 | 10/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 2/7 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Delaney | |||
| Q1 Shiraishi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 57-46 | 57-46 | |
| Total points | 103 | 103 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 35/57 | 35/57 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 23/35 | 23/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/22 | 14/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 88% | 88% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLLWLLW
WLWWLLWLWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Bernard TomicTomic – Charles BroomBroom (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Blake EllisEllis (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesse DelaneyDelaney – Matthew HulmeHulme (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Masamichi ImamuraImamura – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – Maxime JanvierJanvier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shinji HazawaHazawa – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andre IlaganIlagan – Adam WaltonWalton (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sam Ryan ZiegannRyan Ziegann – Jacob BrummBrumm (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
