
Mackenzie Mcdonald and Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Quimper Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 2:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mackenzie Mcdonald who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mackenzie Mcdonald is the pick to win this match.
Mackenzie Mcdonald -> 1.22
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg -> 3.92
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Mackenzie Mcdonald vs. Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
There is no head to head record between Mackenzie Mcdonald and Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 15-8 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 26-23 | 18-12 | 0-4 | 3-1 | 5-6 | 0-0 |
2023 | 35-30 | 23-15 | 0-6 | 4-3 | 8-6 | 0-0 |
2022 | 27-31 | 16-16 | 4-6 | 4-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 42-26 | 15-12 | 12-5 | 9-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 130, Mcdonald reached the 2nd round after beating Adrian Mannarino 3-6 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round against Mannarino, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 6-4). During the match, Mcdonald scored 106 points vs Mannarino’s 105. Mackenzie was quite aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about the service games, Mcdonald made 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Mackenzie Mcdonald lost the serve 4 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Mcdonald put 66% of his first serves in, winning 62% (44/71) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (20/37) on the 2nd serve. Mcdonald broke Mannarino 4 times after converting 27% of his break points (4/15).
Mcdonald has favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (274-218). 4-1 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Mcdonald has a composed 49-38 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Mcdonald’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Oeiras 2 Challenger.
The American has an aggregate 6-3 win-loss record in 2025, 4-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Quimper Challenger
Mcdonald has never competed in this tournament before.
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 12-9 | 3-5 | 1-0 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 39-30 | 11-10 | 13-7 | 15-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2023 | 34-27 | 2-4 | 8-8 | 23-14 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
2022 | 45-24 | 16-7 | 7-5 | 22-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 10-9 | 9-6 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 470, Sascha got to the 2nd round after beating Alexey Vatutin 6-3 6-2, Samuel Vincent Ruggeri 6-3 6-3 and Mika Brunold 0-6 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round against Brunold, The French player recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (0-6 6-3 6-3). During the match Gueymard scored 76 points vs Brunold’s 74. Sascha was exceptionally aggressive to blast 37 winners.
About the serving games, Gueymard made 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Gueymard put 63% of his first serves in, winning 79% (37/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 32% (9/28) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Brunold 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Gueymard has a composed 3-2 win-loss record in 2025, 3-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Mcdonald | Gueymard |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
Tot Games | 29 | 59 |
Pts | 106-105 | 199-170 |
Total Points | 211 | 369 |
Winners | 44 | 89 |
%Winners | 42% | 45% |
Mcdonald played 1 match while Gueymard competed in 3 matches. Gueymard started his run from the qualifications while Mcdonald had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Mackenzie Mcdonald lost 1 set, while Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg conceded 1 set. Mcdonald has played 4 set(s) less than Gueymard (3 vs 7). Therefore, Mcdonald played 30 games less than Gueymard. Mackenzie scored 44 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The French player blasted 89 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Mcdonald | Gueymard |
---|---|---|
Aces | 6 | 20 |
Avg per match | 6 | 6.7 |
1st in | 71/108 | 109/183 |
%1st in | 66% | 60% |
1st pts | 44/71 | 89/109 |
%1st pts | 62% | 82% |
2nd pts | 20/37 | 35/74 |
%2nd pts | 54% | 47% |
Mcdonald scored 6 aces . Gueymard recorded 20 aces (6.7 per match). Mcdonald won 62% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Gueymard won 82% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Mcdonald | Gueymard |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 9 |
Converted | 4/15 | 9/23 |
% Converted | 27% | 39% |
Conceded | 12 | 15 |
Saved | 8 | 12 |
% Saved | 67% | 80% |
Times Broken | 4 | 3 |
The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 27% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The French player broke his opponents 9 times with a 39% conversion rate. Gueymard conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
Mcdonald | |||
R1 Mannarino |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
pts | 106-105 | 106-105 | |
Total points | 211 | 211 | |
Winners | 44 | 44 | |
%Winners | 42% | 42% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 71/108 | 71/108 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
1st pts | 44/71 | 44/71 | |
% 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
2nd pts | 20/37 | 20/37 | |
% 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/15 | 4/15 | |
Converted % | 27% | 27% | |
Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
Saved | 8/12 | 8 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Gueymard | |||||
Q1 Vatutin |
Q3 Vincent Ruggeri |
R1 Brunold |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 6-3 | 0-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 18 | 24 | 59 | |
pts | 59-42 | 64-54 | 76-74 | 199-170 | |
Total points | 101 | 118 | 150 | 369 | |
Winners | 24 | 28 | 37 | 89 | |
%Winners | 41% | 44% | 49% | 45% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 6 | 6 | 8 | 20 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
1st in | 29/50 | 33/58 | 47/75 | 109/183 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 57% | 63% | 60% | |
1st pts | 24/29 | 28/33 | 37/47 | 89/109 | |
% 1st pts | 83% | 85% | 79% | 82% | |
2nd pts | 13/21 | 13/25 | 9/28 | 35/74 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 52% | 32% | 47% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
Converted | 3/8 | 3/9 | 3/6 | 9/23 | |
Converted % | 38% | 33% | 50% | 39% | |
Conceded | 2 | 5 | 8 | 15 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 5/5 | 5/8 | 12 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | 63% | 263% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Head 2 Head



Tennis Scores in Quimper Challenger
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Alibek KachmazovKachmazov (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Rafael Matos/Marcelo ZormannMatos/Marcelo Zormann – Harold Mayot/Luca SanchezMayot/Luca Sanchez (2-6 6-0 10-7) – See score progression
- Romain Arneodo/Manuel GuinardArneodo/Manuel Guinard – Mac Kiger/Finn ReynoldsKiger/Finn Reynolds (6-73 6-4 10-8) – See score progression
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – Jerome KymKym (6-3 7-66) – See score progression
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Mattia BellucciBellucci (7-65 7-5) – See score progression
- Sascha Gueymard WayenburgGueymard Wayenburg – Mika BrunoldBrunold (0-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Ricardas BerankisBerankis – Borna CoricCoric (7-66 6-3) – See score progression
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (6-1 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Laslo DjereDjere – Arthur GeaGea (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (3-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Elmer MollerMoller – Stefan KozlovKozlov (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – August HolmgrenHolmgren (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Benoit PairePaire – Harold MayotMayot (6-2 1-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Calvin HemeryHemery (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Terence AtmaneAtmane (7-62 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Jozef KovalikKovalik (6-73 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (3-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Sascha Gueymard WayenburgGueymard Wayenburg – Mika BrunoldBrunold (0-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Laslo DjereDjere – Arthur GeaGea (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (6-1 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (6-4 7-6(7)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Titouan DroguetDroguet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Ugo BlanchetBlanchet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Richard BerankisBerankis (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Benoit PairePaire (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Laslo DjereDjere (0-0) – H2H and prediction