Sandro Kopp and Mika Brunold will play each other in the 2nd round of the Nottingham Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:00 pm on COURT 5. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mika Brunold who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mika Brunold is the pick to win this match.
Mika Brunold -> 1.36
Sandro Kopp -> 2.94
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Sandro Kopp vs. Mika Brunold
There is no head to head record between Sandro Kopp and Mika Brunold since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Sandro Kopp
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 40-26 | 5-3 | 32-21 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 36-30 | 0-0 | 26-22 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
2022 | 54-26 | 6-5 | 32-16 | 14-4 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2021 | 33-24 | 3-6 | 30-16 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 346, Kopp got to the 2nd round after defeating Aidan Mayo 6-3 6-7(6) 6-3.
In the 1st round, Kopp defeated Mayo (6-3 6-76 6-3). During the match, Kopp scored 100 points vs Mayo’s 93. Kopp was extremely aggressive to blast 56 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kopp fired 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Sandro Kopp lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Kopp put 71% of his first serves in, winning 71% (56/79) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (15/32) on the 2nd serve. Sandro broke Mayo 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Kopp has a winning win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 58% of his matches (229-165). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Kopp has an overall32-21 record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
The Austrian has a composed 1-0 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham Challenger
The Austrian has never competed in this tournament before.
Mika Brunold
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 43-25 | 3-4 | 34-16 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2023 | 23-21 | 2-3 | 10-9 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
2022 | 11-9 | 2-2 | 5-4 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 387, Mika reached the 2nd round after beating Alexis Gautier 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Mika had a good straight sets win against Gautier (6-3 6-4). During the match Brunold scored 71 points vs Gautier’s 51. Brunold was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, Brunold made 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Mika Brunold was quite effective on serve to win 72% (26/36) of his 1st serve and 63% (15/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Swiss broke Gautier 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Brunold has an overall 1-0 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Kopp | Brunold |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 31 | 19 |
Pts | 100-93 | 71-51 |
Total Points | 193 | 122 |
Winners | 56 | 26 |
%Winners | 56% | 37% |
Both Kopp and Brunold played 1 match. At the moment, Sandro Kopp dropped 1 set while Mika Brunold hasn’t dropped a set so far. Kopp has played 1 set more than Brunold (3 vs 2). Therefore, Kopp played 12 games more than Brunold. The Austrian scored 56 winners (56% of the total points). On the other side, The Swiss fired 26 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Kopp | Brunold |
---|---|---|
Aces | 8 | 3 |
Avg per match | 8 | 3 |
1st in | 79/111 | 36/60 |
%1st in | 71% | 60% |
1st pts | 56/79 | 26/36 |
%1st pts | 71% | 72% |
2nd pts | 15/32 | 15/24 |
%2nd pts | 47% | 63% |
Kopp bagged 8 aces . Brunold struck 3 aces . Kopp won 71% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Brunold won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Kopp | Brunold |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 4 |
Converted | 3/7 | 4/9 |
% Converted | 43% | 44% |
Conceded | 5 | 6 |
Saved | 4 | 4 |
% Saved | 80% | 67% |
Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Kopp broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Sandro dropped his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. The Swiss broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Brunold conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Kopp | |||
R1 Mayo |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-76 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
pts | 100-93 | 100-93 | |
Total points | 193 | 193 | |
Winners | 56 | 56 | |
%Winners | 56% | 56% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 8 | 8 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 79/111 | 79/111 | |
% 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
1st pts | 56/79 | 56/79 | |
% 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
2nd pts | 15/32 | 15/32 | |
% 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Brunold | |||
R1 Gautier |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 71-51 | 71-51 | |
Total points | 122 | 122 | |
Winners | 26 | 26 | |
%Winners | 37% | 37% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 36/60 | 36/60 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
1st pts | 26/36 | 26/36 | |
% 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 15/24 | 15/24 | |
% 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Nottingham Challenger
- Anton MatusevichMatusevich – Jules MarieMarie (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Milos KarolKarol – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Luka MikrutMikrut – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (6-72 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Nicolai Budkov KjaerBudkov Kjaer (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Chris RodeschRodesch – Ryan NijboerNijboer (4-6 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – Tristan LamasineLamasine (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Norbert GombosGombos – Jay ClarkeClarke (2-6 7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Lukas PokornyPokorny – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Mika BrunoldBrunold – Alexis GautierGautier (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Dino PrizmicPrizmic – Kalin IvanovskiIvanovski (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Dennis NovakNovak – Edas ButvilasButvilas (7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Sandro KoppKopp – Aidan MayoMayo (6-3 6-76 6-3) – See score progression
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Mili PoljicakPoljicak (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Johannus MondayMonday – Ryan PenistonPeniston (2-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Henry SearleSearle – Michael GeertsGeerts (7-64 7-5) – See score progression
- Lui Maxted/Charlie RobertsonMaxted/Charlie Robertson – Chris Rodesch/Mick VeldheerRodesch/Mick Veldheer (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Filip MisolicMisolic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – Dennis NovakNovak (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sandro KoppKopp – (0-0) – H2H and prediction