Luka Mikrut and Norbert Gombos will square off in the 2nd round of the Nottingham Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:30 am on COURT 4. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Norbert Gombos who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Norbert Gombos is the pick to win this match.
Norbert Gombos -> 1.6
Luka Mikrut -> 2.22
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Luka Mikrut vs. Norbert Gombos
There is no head to head record between Luka Mikrut and Norbert Gombos since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Luka Mikrut
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 37-26 | 5-4 | 31-19 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-18 | 5-3 | 28-14 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-14 | 9-2 | 6-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 381, Luka got to the 2nd round after defeating Jonas Forejtek 6-7(2) 6-3 6-1.
In the 1st round against Forejtek, Luka recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-72 6-3 6-1). During the match, Mikrut scored 94 points vs Forejtek’s 80. Mikrut was quite aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about the service games, Mikrut fired 15 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Luka Mikrut lost the serve once. Furthermore, Mikrut put 69% of his first serves in, winning 79% (44/56) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (12/25) on the 2nd serve. The Croatian broke Forejtek 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Mikrut has a winning win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 57% of his matches (87-65). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Mikrut has a compiled2-4 win-loss record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
Luka has an overall 1-0 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham Challenger
Luka has never competed in this tournament before.
Norbert Gombos
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 23-23 | 13-3 | 10-13 | 0-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 18-23 | 2-4 | 11-10 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-28 | 7-3 | 28-17 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-30 | 0-9 | 13-10 | 12-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 433, Norbert got to the 2nd round after beating Felix Corwin 7-6(3) 2-6 6-4 and Jay Clarke 2-6 7-5 6-2.
In the 1st round against Clarke, The Slovakian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 7-5 6-2). During the match Gombos and Clarke scored the same amount of points (85). However, the world no. 381 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Norbert was exceptionally aggressive to blast 37 winners.
About the serving games, Gombos scored 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Norbert Gombos lost the serve 6 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Gombos put 72% of his first serves in, winning 64% (37/58) of the points behind his 1st serve and 35% (8/23) on the 2nd serve. Norbert broke Clarke 7 times after converting 54% of his break points (7/13).
The Slovakian has an aggregate 2-1 win-loss record in 2025, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mikrut | Gombos |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 59 |
| Pts | 94-80 | 189-185 |
| Total Points | 174 | 374 |
| Winners | 44 | 76 |
| %Winners | 47% | 40% |
Mikrut played 1 match while Gombos competed in 2 matches. Gombos started his run from the qualifications while Mikrut had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Luka Mikrut surrendered 1 set, while Norbert Gombos lost 2 sets. Mikrut has played 3 set(s) less than Gombos (3 vs 6). Therefore, Mikrut played 30 games less than Gombos. Mikrut scored 44 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, The Slovakian managed to score 76 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mikrut | Gombos |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 15 | 6.5 |
| 1st in | 56/81 | 117/173 |
| %1st in | 69% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 44/56 | 76/117 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 12/25 | 28/56 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 50% |
Mikrut bagged 15 aces . Gombos scored 13 aces (6.5 per match). Mikrut won 79% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Gombos won 65% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mikrut | Gombos |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 10 |
| Converted | 5/11 | 10/20 |
| % Converted | 45% | 50% |
| Conceded | 1 | 15 |
| Saved | 0 | 5 |
| % Saved | 0% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 10 |
Luka broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Mikrut lost his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The Slovakian broke his opponents 10 times with a 50% conversion rate. Gombos conceded his serve 10 times and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Mikrut | |||
| R1 Forejtek |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-72 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 94-80 | 94-80 | |
| Total points | 174 | 174 | |
| Winners | 44 | 44 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 15 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 56/81 | 56/81 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 44/56 | 44/56 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/25 | 12/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Gombos | |||||
| Q1 Corwin |
Q3 Gautier |
R1 Clarke |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 2-6 6-4 | 7-64 6-4 | 2-6 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 23 | 28 | 82 | |
| pts | 104-100 | – | 85-85 | 189-185 | |
| Total points | 204 | 0 | 170 | 374 | |
| Winners | 39 | 37 | 76 | ||
| %Winners | 38% | 0% | 44% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 0 | 8 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 6 | ||
| 1st in | 59/92 | / | 58/81 | 117/173 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 0% | 72% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 39/59 | / | 37/58 | 76/117 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 0% | 64% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/33 | / | 8/23 | 28/56 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 0% | 35% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 7 | 10 | ||
| Converted | 3/7 | / | 7/13 | 10/20 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 0% | 54% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 10 | 15 | ||
| Saved | 1/5 | 0/ | 4/10 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 20% | – | 40% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 6 | 10 | ||
Head 2 Head
W
WLW Tennis Scores in Nottingham Challenger
- Mika BrunoldBrunold – Alexis GautierGautier (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Dino PrizmicPrizmic – Kalin IvanovskiIvanovski (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Norbert GombosGombos – Jay ClarkeClarke (2-6 7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Anton MatusevichMatusevich – Jules MarieMarie (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Chris RodeschRodesch – Ryan NijboerNijboer (4-6 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Milos KarolKarol – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Lukas PokornyPokorny – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – Tristan LamasineLamasine (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Nicolai Budkov KjaerBudkov Kjaer (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Luka MikrutMikrut – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (6-72 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Henry SearleSearle – Michael GeertsGeerts (7-64 7-5) – See score progression
- Lui Maxted/Charlie RobertsonMaxted/Charlie Robertson – Chris Rodesch/Mick VeldheerRodesch/Mick Veldheer (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Johannus MondayMonday – Ryan PenistonPeniston (2-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Mili PoljicakPoljicak (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Dennis NovakNovak – Edas ButvilasButvilas (7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Sandro KoppKopp – Aidan MayoMayo (6-3 6-76 6-3) – See score progression
- Lukas PokornyPokorny – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Milos KarolKarol – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (6-4 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Nicolai Budkov KjaerBudkov Kjaer (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Mika BrunoldBrunold – Alexis GautierGautier (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Chris RodeschRodesch – Ryan NijboerNijboer (4-6 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Filip MisolicMisolic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – Dennis NovakNovak (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sandro KoppKopp – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
