Patrick Zahraj and Liam Broady will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Nottingham Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:00 pm on COURT 4. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Liam Broady who should win in 3 sets.
Liam Broady -> 1.51
Patrick Zahraj -> 2.42
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Patrick Zahraj vs. Liam Broady
There is no head to head record between Patrick Zahraj and Liam Broady since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Patrick Zahraj
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 42-31 | 9-5 | 17-15 | 14-9 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2023 | 28-16 | 4-3 | 15-10 | 7-2 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2022 | 10-7 | 0-1 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 467, the German reached the qualifications after defeating Antoine Ghibaudo 6-4 6-0.
In the qualifications, Zahraj had a good straight sets win against Ghibaudo (6-4 6-0). During the match, Zahraj scored 63 points vs Ghibaudo’s 43. Patrick was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about the service games, Zahraj made 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Patrick Zahraj lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Zahraj put 66% of his first serves in, winning 68% (21/31) of the points behind his 1st serve and 69% (11/16) on the 2nd serve. Zahraj broke Ghibaudo 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Zahraj started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t lost yet a set in this event to conquer 59% of the points he played.
Zahraj has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 58% of his matches (109-79). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Zahraj has a compiled25-14 win-loss record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
The German has an overall 1-0 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham Challenger
The German has never competed in this tournament before.
Liam Broady
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 10-18 | 8-13 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-28 | 23-9 | 2-4 | 15-9 | 5-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-25 | 16-9 | 2-5 | 10-5 | 8-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 45-26 | 19-10 | 7-5 | 16-7 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 788, Liam got to the qualifications after defeating Cem Ilkel 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, Broady had a good straight sets win against Ilkel (6-1 6-3). During the match Broady scored 65 points vs Ilkel’s 41. Liam was pretty aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Broady scored 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Liam Broady was exceptionally effective on serve to win 77% (27/35) of his 1st serve and 60% (9/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Liam broke Ilkel 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
The Brit has a compiled 1-0 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zahraj | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 |
| Pts | 63-43 | 65-41 |
| Total Points | 106 | 106 |
| Winners | 21 | 27 |
| %Winners | 33% | 42% |
Both Zahraj and Broady played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Zahraj and Broady have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (16). The German scored 21 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit recorded 27 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zahraj | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 5 |
| 1st in | 31/47 | 35/50 |
| %1st in | 66% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 21/31 | 27/35 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 11/16 | 9/15 |
| %2nd pts | 69% | 60% |
Zahraj struck 6 aces . Broady bagged 5 aces . Zahraj won 68% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 69% of the points. On the other side, Broady won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zahraj | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/12 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 42% | 44% |
| Conceded | 3 | 2 |
| Saved | 2 | 2 |
| % Saved | 67% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The German broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Patrick conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Liam was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Zahraj | ||||
| Q1 Ghibaudo | Q1 Ghibaudo | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-0 | 6-4 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | 32 | |
| pts | 63-43 | 63-43 | 126-86 | |
| Total points | 106 | 106 | 212 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 31/47 | 31/47 | 62/94 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 21/31 | 21/31 | 42/62 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/16 | 11/16 | 22/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 69% | 69% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | 10/24 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2/3 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Broady | ||||
| Q1 Ilkel | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | |||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | ||
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | ||
| pts | 65-41 | 65-41 | ||
| Total points | 106 | 106 | ||
| Winners | 27 | 27 | ||
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | ||
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | ||
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | ||
| 1st in | 35/50 | 35/50 | ||
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | ||
| 1st pts | 27/35 | 27/35 | ||
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | ||
| 2nd pts | 9/15 | 9/15 | ||
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | ||
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | ||
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | ||
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | ||
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | ||
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | ||
| Saved % | 100% | 50% | ||
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | ||
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jules MarieMarie – Anton MatusevichMatusevich (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Norbert GombosGombos – Alexis GautierGautier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dennis NovakNovak – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Blake MottMott – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick ZahrajZahraj – Liam BroadyBroady (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Filip MisolicMisolic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan NijboerNijboer – Chris RodeschRodesch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harry WendelkenWendelken – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – (0-0) – H2H and prediction