Tristan Lamasine and Yanaki Milev will face off in the qualifications of the Nottingham Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:30 am on COURT 5. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tristan Lamasine who should win in 2 sets.
Tristan Lamasine -> 1.32
Yanaki Milev -> 3.14
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Tristan Lamasine vs. Yanaki Milev
There is no head to head record between Tristan Lamasine and Yanaki Milev since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Tristan Lamasine
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 26-34 | 0-3 | 5-17 | 21-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 59-23 | 4-1 | 23-9 | 30-11 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2022 | 22-27 | 0-0 | 14-18 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-27 | 3-3 | 14-17 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 466, the French player reached the qualifications after beating Charlie Robertson 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 and Yanaki Milev 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications against Robertson, Tristan recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-65 6-3). During the match, Lamasine scored 106 points vs Robertson’s 97. The French player was extremely aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lamasine made 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Tristan Lamasine was extremely effective on serve to win 78% (46/59) of his 1st serve and 57% (17/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Tristan broke Robertson 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
Lamasine has good match record in the last 10 years having won 53% of his matches (278-246). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Lamasine has a composed 118-88 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Tristan has a composed 1-0 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham Challenger
Yanaki Milev
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-27 | 0-1 | 39-25 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-26 | 0-0 | 35-25 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-15 | 4-3 | 17-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 500, Milev reached the qualifications after beating Hamish Stewart 6-4 7-6(7).
In the qualifications, The Bulgarian had a good straight sets win against Stewart (6-4 7-67). During the match Milev scored 71 points vs Stewart’s 68. Milev was quite aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about serving, Milev scored 3 aces and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Yanaki Milev was quite effective on serve to win 79% (41/52) of his 1st serve and 59% (13/22) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Bulgarian was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Stewart once.
Yanaki has an aggregate 1-0 win-loss record in 2025, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham Challenger
The Bulgarian has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lamasine | Milev |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 32 | 23 |
| Pts | 106-97 | 71-68 |
| Total Points | 203 | 139 |
| Winners | 46 | 41 |
| %Winners | 43% | 58% |
Both Lamasine and Milev played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Tristan Lamasine conceded 1 set while Yanaki Milev hasn’t conceded a set so far. Lamasine has played 1 set more than Milev (3 vs 2). Therefore, Lamasine played 9 games more than Milev. The French player scored 46 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Milev scored 41 winners (58%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lamasine | Milev |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 3 |
| 1st in | 59/89 | 52/74 |
| %1st in | 66% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 46/59 | 41/52 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 17/30 | 13/22 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 59% |
Lamasine blasted 5 aces . Milev recorded 3 aces . Lamasine won 78% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Milev won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lamasine | Milev |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 1 |
| Converted | 3/12 | 1/1 |
| % Converted | 25% | 100% |
| Conceded | 3 | 0 |
| Saved | 1 | 0 |
| % Saved | 33% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
The French player broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. The French player conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. Yanaki broke his opponent once with a 100% conversion rate. Yanaki was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Lamasine | |||
| Q1 Robertson | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-65 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 106-97 | 106-97 | |
| Total points | 203 | 203 | |
| Winners | 46 | 46 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 59/89 | 59/89 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 46/59 | 46/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/30 | 17/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Milev | |||
| Q1 Stewart | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-67 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 71-68 | 71-68 | |
| Total points | 139 | 139 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 58% | 58% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 52/74 | 52/74 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 41/52 | 41/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/22 | 13/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/1 | 1/1 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jules MarieMarie – Anton MatusevichMatusevich (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Norbert GombosGombos – Alexis GautierGautier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dennis NovakNovak – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Blake MottMott – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick ZahrajZahraj – Liam BroadyBroady (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Filip MisolicMisolic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan NijboerNijboer – Chris RodeschRodesch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harry WendelkenWendelken – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – (0-0) – H2H and prediction