Martin Landaluce and Ethan Quinn will square off in the semifinal of the Canberra Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 6:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Martin Landaluce who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Martin Landaluce is the pick to win this match.
Martin Landaluce -> 1.53
Ethan Quinn -> 2.375
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Martin Landaluce vs. Ethan Quinn
There is no head to head record between Martin Landaluce and Ethan Quinn since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Martin Landaluce
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 42-24 | 23-9 | 13-11 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 26-27 | 11-10 | 15-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 151 (career-high), Martin reached the semifinal after beating Mattia Bellucci 6-3 6-2, Dane Sweeny 6-1 6-2 and Yosuke Watanuki w/o.
In the quarter, Landaluce defeated Watanuki (w/o). During the match, Landaluce and Watanuki scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 151 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Landaluce was not very aggressive to strike just winners.
Regarding the service games, Landaluce couldn’t to score even 1 ace and he was very steady in conceding no double faults. Martin Landaluce conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (0) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (0) on the 2nd serve.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Landaluce hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this tournament to win 62% of the points he played.
Landaluce has a winning win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 57% of his matches (70-53). 2-0 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Landaluce has a composed36-20 match record in the last 4 years on hard.
The Spaniard has an aggregate 2-0 win-loss record in 2025, 2-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Canberra Challenger
The Spaniard has never competed in this tournament before.
Ethan Quinn
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 5-0 | 5-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2024 | 33-34 | 17-18 | 2-7 | 13-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 21-16 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 30-14 | 21-7 | 6-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 202 (career-high), the American reached the semifinal after defeating Paul Jubb 7-6(4) 6-4, Daniel Evans 6-2 6-3, Blake Ellis 7-6(4) 7-6(5), Patrick Kypson 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 and Vit Kopriva 6-4 7-5.
In the quarter, The American had a good straight sets win against Kopriva (6-4 7-5). During the match Quinn scored 74 points vs Kopriva’s 60. Quinn was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Quinn bagged 5 aces and he was pretty steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Ethan Quinn was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 72% (26/36) of his 1st serve and 76% (16/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Ethan broke Kopriva 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Quinn has an aggregate 5-0 win-loss record in 2025, 5-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Landaluce | Quinn |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 5 |
Tot Set | 4 | 11 |
Tot Games | 32 | 120 |
Pts | 116-72 | 392-345 |
Total Points | 188 | 737 |
Winners | 46 | 168 |
%Winners | 40% | 43% |
Landaluce played 2 matches while Quinn competed in 5 matches. Quinn started his run from the qualifications while Landaluce had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Ethan Quinn conceded 1 set while Martin Landaluce hasn’t lost a set so far. Landaluce has played 7 set(s) less than Quinn (4 vs 11). Therefore, Landaluce played 88 games less than Quinn. Landaluce scored 46 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The American recorded 168 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Landaluce | Quinn |
---|---|---|
Aces | 16 | 40 |
Avg per match | 8 | 8 |
1st in | 54/97 | 226/360 |
%1st in | 56% | 63% |
1st pts | 46/54 | 168/226 |
%1st pts | 85% | 74% |
2nd pts | 25/43 | 84/134 |
%2nd pts | 58% | 63% |
Landaluce made 16 aces (8 per match). Quinn scored 40 aces (8 per match). Landaluce won 85% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Quinn won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Landaluce | Quinn |
---|---|---|
Won | 8 | 13 |
Converted | 8/11 | 13/37 |
% Converted | 73% | 35% |
Conceded | 6 | 20 |
Saved | 5 | 13 |
% Saved | 83% | 65% |
Times Broken | 1 | 7 |
The Spaniard broke his opponents 8 times with a 73% conversion rate. Landaluce dropped his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. Quinn broke his opponents 13 times with a 35% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 65% of the break points that he conceded.
Landaluce | |||||
R1 Bellucci |
R2 Sweeny |
1/4 Watanuki |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-1 6-2 | w/o | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | – | 4 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 15 | – | 32 | |
pts | 57-37 | 59-35 | – | 116-72 | |
Total points | 94 | 94 | – | 188 | |
Winners | 21 | 25 | – | 46 | |
%Winners | 37% | 42% | – | 40% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 6 | 10 | – | 16 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 8 | – | 9 | |
1st in | 25/46 | 29/51 | – | 54/97 | |
% 1st in | 54% | 57% | – | 56% | |
1st pts | 21/25 | 25/29 | – | 46/54 | |
% 1st pts | 84% | 86% | – | 85% | |
2nd pts | 16/21 | 9/22 | – | 25/43 | |
% 2nd pts | 76% | 41% | – | 58% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 3 | 5 | – | 8 | |
Converted | 3/5 | 5/6 | – | 8/11 | |
Converted % | 60% | 83% | – | 73% | |
Conceded | 2 | 4 | – | 6 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 3/4 | – | 5 | |
Saved % | 100% | 75% | – | 58% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 | – | 1 |
Quinn | |||||||
Q1 Jubb |
Q3 Evans |
R1 Ellis |
R2 Kypson |
1/4 Kopriva |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-64 6-4 | 6-2 6-3 | 7-64 7-65 | 3-6 7-65 6-4 | 6-4 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 11 | |
Tot Games | 23 | 17 | 26 | 32 | 22 | 120 | |
pts | 77-69 | 63-38 | 83-82 | 95-96 | 74-60 | 392-345 | |
Total points | 146 | 101 | 165 | 191 | 134 | 737 | |
Winners | 34 | 25 | 35 | 48 | 26 | 168 | |
%Winners | 44% | 40% | 42% | 51% | 35% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||||||
Aces | 6 | 7 | 5 | 17 | 5 | 40 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 | |
1st in | 48/79 | 29/44 | 52/84 | 61/96 | 36/57 | 226/360 | |
% 1st in | 61% | 66% | 62% | 64% | 63% | 63% | |
1st pts | 34/48 | 25/29 | 35/52 | 48/61 | 26/36 | 168/226 | |
% 1st pts | 71% | 86% | 67% | 79% | 72% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 18/31 | 11/15 | 18/32 | 21/35 | 16/21 | 84/134 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 73% | 56% | 60% | 76% | 63% | |
Breaks | |||||||
Won | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 13 | |
Converted | 2/4 | 3/8 | 3/10 | 2/6 | 3/9 | 13/37 | |
Converted % | 50% | 38% | 30% | 33% | 33% | 35% | |
Conceded | 6 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 20 | |
Saved | 5/6 | 0/0 | 4/7 | 4/6 | 0/1 | 13 | |
Saved % | 83% | – | 57% | 67% | 0% | 69% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Canberra Challenger
- Joao FonsecaFonseca – Harold MayotMayot (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (w/o) – See score progression
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Christopher EubanksEubanks (4-6 6-2 7-63) – See score progression
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Vit KoprivaKopriva (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – (0-0) – H2H and prediction