Ashlyn Krueger and Suzan Lamens will face off in the 3rd round of the Brisbane International for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:30 pm on SHOW COURT 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ashlyn Krueger who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ashlyn Krueger is the pick to win this match.
Ashlyn Krueger -> 1.48
Suzan Lamens -> 2.65
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ashlyn Krueger vs. Suzan Lamens
There is no head to head record between Ashlyn Krueger and Suzan Lamens since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Ashlyn Krueger
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 29-26 | 19-17 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-26 | 26-15 | 8-6 | 2-2 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-22 | 23-17 | 10-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-14 | 10-11 | 5-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 64, Krueger reached the 3rd round after defeating Moyuka Uchijima 6-3 1-6 6-3 and Anna Kalinskaya 6-3 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Krueger had a good straight sets win against Kalinskaya (6-3 6-3). During the match, Krueger scored 58 points vs Kalinskaya’s 46. Ashlyn was quite aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Krueger made 6 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Ashlyn Krueger was exceptionally effective on serve to win 77% (30/39) of her 1st serve and 53% (9/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Krueger was clinical in her return game without wasting any break point and break Kalinskaya 3 times.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Krueger has dropped 1 set in this competition to win 54% of the points she played.
Krueger has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 58% of her matches (138-101). 2-0 on hard in 2025. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Krueger has a compiled93-68 win-loss record in the last 6 years on hard.
The American has an aggregate 2-0 win-loss record in 2025, 2-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Brisbane
Suzan Lamens
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 46-27 | 15-11 | 19-10 | 11-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-31 | 7-7 | 33-19 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-27 | 13-9 | 24-11 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 48-27 | 21-9 | 22-14 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 87, the Dutch reached the 3rd round after defeating Kamilla Rakhimova 6-2 6-4 and Magdalena Frech 7-5 6-3.
In the 2nd round, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Frech (7-5 6-3). During the match Lamens scored 78 points vs Frech’s 64. The Dutch was quite aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Lamens made 2 aces and she committed only 5 double faults. Suzan Lamens lost the serve twice and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Lamens put 61% of her first serves in, winning 72% (33/46) of the points behind her 1st serve and 45% (13/29) on the 2nd serve. The Dutch broke Frech 4 times after converting 67% of her break points (4/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Lamens hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 55% of the points she played.
Lamens has a composed 2-0 win-loss record in 2025, 2-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Brisbane
Suzan has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Krueger | Lamens |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 43 | 39 |
| Pts | 135-115 | 149-121 |
| Total Points | 250 | 270 |
| Winners | 65 | 64 |
| %Winners | 48% | 43% |
Both Krueger and Lamens played 2 matches. At the moment, Ashlyn Krueger dropped 1 set while Suzan Lamens hasn’t conceded a set so far. Krueger has played 1 set more than Lamens (5 vs 4). Therefore, Krueger played 4 games more than Lamens. Krueger scored 65 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Lamens recorded 64 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Krueger | Lamens |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 5.5 | 2.5 |
| 1st in | 87/125 | 88/148 |
| %1st in | 70% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 65/87 | 64/88 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 19/38 | 29/60 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 48% |
Krueger scored 11 aces (5.5 per match). Lamens struck 5 aces (2.5 per match). Krueger won 75% points on her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Lamens won 73% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Krueger | Lamens |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 7 |
| Converted | 6/8 | 7/13 |
| % Converted | 75% | 54% |
| Conceded | 8 | 15 |
| Saved | 5 | 13 |
| % Saved | 63% | 87% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
Krueger broke her opponents 6 times with a 75% conversion rate. Krueger dropped her serve 3 times and she saved 63% of the break points that she conceded. Lamens broke her opponents 7 times with a 54% conversion rate. Suzan conceded her serve twice and she saved 87% of the break points that she conceded.
| Krueger | ||||
| R1 Uchijima |
R2 Kalinskaya |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 1-6 6-3 | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 18 | 43 | |
| pts | 77-69 | 58-46 | 135-115 | |
| Total points | 146 | 104 | 250 | |
| Winners | 35 | 30 | 65 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 52% | 48% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 6 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 48/69 | 39/56 | 87/125 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 35/48 | 30/39 | 65/87 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 77% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/21 | 9/17 | 19/38 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 53% | 50% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/3 | 6/8 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 100% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 3/3 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 100% | 70% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| Lamens | ||||
| R1 Rakhimova |
R2 Frech |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 21 | 39 | |
| pts | 71-57 | 78-64 | 149-121 | |
| Total points | 128 | 142 | 270 | |
| Winners | 31 | 33 | 64 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 42% | 43% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 5 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 42/73 | 46/75 | 88/148 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 61% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 31/42 | 33/46 | 64/88 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 72% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/31 | 13/29 | 29/60 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 45% | 48% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 4/6 | 7/13 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 67% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 8 | 15 | |
| Saved | 7/7 | 6/8 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 75% | 88% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WW
WW Tennis Scores in Brisbane
- Polina KudermetovaKudermetova – Liudmila SamsonovaSamsonova (6-77 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Suzan LamensLamens – Magdalena FrechFrech (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Yue YuanYuan – Marta KostyukKostyuk (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Anastasia PotapovaPotapova – Dayana YastremskaYastremska (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Victoria AzarenkaAzarenka – Maya JointJoint (6-75 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Daria KasatkinaKasatkina – Peyton StearnsStearns (7-67 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Kimberly BirrellBirrell – Emma NavarroNavarro (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Linda NoskovaNoskova – Anca Alexia TodoniAlexia Todoni (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Diana ShnaiderShnaider (6-3 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan – Paula BadosaBadosa (6-3 1-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Ashlyn KruegerKrueger – Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Ons JabeurJabeur – Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Aryna SabalenkaSabalenka – Renata ZarazuaZarazua (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Mirra AndreevaAndreeva – Anna BlinkovaBlinkova (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Marie BouzkovaBouzkova – Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko (7-60 6-4) – See score progression
- Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva – Mccartney KesslerKessler (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Marek JaloviecJaloviec – Gabriel DonevDonev (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Aaron AddisonAddison – Henry CraigCraig (7-65 7-63) – See score progression
- Edan LeshemLeshem – Jonas TrinkerTrinker (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Yshai OlielOliel – Robin StanekStanek (6-3 ret.) – See score progression
- Patrik NemaNema – Aidan MchughMchugh (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Lloyd GlasspoolGlasspool – Erik CrepaldiCrepaldi (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Victoria AzarenkaAzarenka – Maya JointJoint (6-7(5) 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Linda NoskovaNoskova – Anca Alexia TodoniAlexia Todoni (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Suzan LamensLamens – Magdalena FrechFrech (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Daria KasatkinaKasatkina – Peyton StearnsStearns (7-6(7) 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Yue YuanYuan – Marta KostyukKostyuk (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Anastasia PotapovaPotapova – Dayana YastremskaYastremska (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Aryna SabalenkaSabalenka – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Victoria AzarenkaAzarenka – Marie BouzkovaBouzkova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan – Ons JabeurJabeur (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anhelina KalininaKalinina – Yue YuanYuan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia PotapovaPotapova – Kimberly BirrellBirrell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
