Ethan Quinn and Patrick Kypson will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Canberra Challenger for the 7th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 12:00 pm on COURT 7. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ethan Quinn who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ethan Quinn is the pick to win this match.
Ethan Quinn -> 1.77
Patrick Kypson -> 1.96
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ethan Quinn vs. Patrick Kypson
This will be the 7th time that Ethan Quinn and Patrick Kypson fight against each other. The head to head is 5-1 for Kypson (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Kypson won 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 in the 1st round in the Sioux Falls Challenger back in October 2024.
Ethan Quinn
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3-0 | 3-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-34 | 17-18 | 2-7 | 13-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-16 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-14 | 21-7 | 6-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 202 (career-high), Quinn reached the 2nd round after defeating Paul Jubb 7-6(4) 6-4, Daniel Evans 6-2 6-3 and Blake Ellis 7-6(4) 7-6(5).
In the 1st round, Ethan had a good straight sets win against Ellis (7-64 7-65). During the match, Quinn scored 83 points vs Ellis’s 82. Quinn was pretty aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Regarding the service games, Quinn made 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Ethan Quinn lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Quinn put 62% of his first serves in, winning 67% (35/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (18/32) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Ellis 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Quinn has a winning win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 57% of his matches (88-67). 17-18 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Quinn has an aggregate54-39 match record in the last 4 years on hard.
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Champaign Challenger where he beat Nishesh Basavareddy in the final 6-3 6-1.
Quinn has a composed 33-34 win-loss record in 2024, 17-18 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Canberra Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Patrick Kypson
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3-0 | 3-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 26-27 | 8-11 | 4-7 | 12-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-21 | 10-11 | 17-6 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-14 | 13-7 | 2-2 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-11 | 4-2 | 20-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 211, the American reached the 2nd round after defeating Yuta Shimizu 6-3 6-4, Calvin Hemery 7-6(5) 6-2 and Sumit Nagal 6-2 4-6 6-1.
In the 1st round, Kypson defeated Nagal (6-2 4-6 6-1). During the match Kypson scored 87 points vs Nagal’s 65. Kypson was exceptionally aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Kypson bagged 15 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Patrick Kypson lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Kypson put 68% of his first serves in, winning 67% (38/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (15/27) on the 2nd serve. Patrick broke Nagal 6 times after converting 86% of his break points (6/7).
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Cleveland Challenger where he overcame Ethan Quinn in the final 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Patrick has an overall 26-27 win-loss record in 2024, 8-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Quinn | Kypson |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 66 | 65 |
| Pts | 223-189 | 224-178 |
| Total Points | 412 | 402 |
| Winners | 94 | 114 |
| %Winners | 42% | 51% |
Both Quinn and Kypson played 3 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Patrick Kypson lost 1 set while Ethan Quinn hasn’t dropped a set so far. Quinn has played 1 set(s) less than Kypson (6 vs 7). However, it’s interesting to notice that Quinn played 1 game more than Kypson. The American scored 94 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Kypson made 114 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Quinn | Kypson |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 18 | 38 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 12.7 |
| 1st in | 129/207 | 156/214 |
| %1st in | 62% | 73% |
| 1st pts | 94/129 | 114/156 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 47/78 | 34/58 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 59% |
Quinn managed to score 18 aces (6 per match). Kypson bagged 38 aces (12.7 per match). Quinn won 73% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Kypson won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Quinn | Kypson |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 10 |
| Converted | 8/22 | 10/16 |
| % Converted | 36% | 63% |
| Conceded | 13 | 12 |
| Saved | 9 | 9 |
| % Saved | 69% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 3 |
Ethan broke his opponents 8 times with a 36% conversion rate. Quinn dropped his serve 4 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded. Patrick broke his opponents 10 times with a 63% conversion rate. Kypson conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Quinn | |||||
| Q1 Jubb |
Q3 Evans |
R1 Ellis |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-4 | 6-2 6-3 | 7-64 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 17 | 26 | 66 | |
| pts | 77-69 | 63-38 | 83-82 | 223-189 | |
| Total points | 146 | 101 | 165 | 412 | |
| Winners | 34 | 25 | 35 | 94 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 40% | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 7 | 5 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 48/79 | 29/44 | 52/84 | 129/207 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 66% | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 34/48 | 25/29 | 35/52 | 94/129 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 86% | 67% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/31 | 11/15 | 18/32 | 47/78 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 73% | 56% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 3/8 | 3/10 | 8/22 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 38% | 30% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 0 | 7 | 13 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 0/0 | 4/7 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 83% | – | 57% | 47% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | |
| Kypson | |||||
| Q1 Shimizu |
Q3 Hemery |
R1 Nagal |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | 7-65 6-2 | 6-2 4-6 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 21 | 25 | 65 | |
| pts | 68-58 | 69-55 | 87-65 | 224-178 | |
| Total points | 126 | 124 | 152 | 402 | |
| Winners | 36 | 40 | 38 | 114 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 58% | 44% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 11 | 12 | 15 | 38 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 52/69 | 47/61 | 57/84 | 156/214 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 77% | 68% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 36/52 | 40/47 | 38/57 | 114/156 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 85% | 67% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/17 | 8/14 | 15/27 | 34/58 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 57% | 56% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 2 | 6 | 10 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/3 | 6/7 | 10/16 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 67% | 86% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 2 | 6 | 12 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 2/2 | 3/6 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 50% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Canberra Challenger
- Joao FonsecaFonseca – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Hayden Jones/Pavle MarinkovJones/Pavle Marinkov – Hugo Gaston/Gauthier OnclinGaston/Gauthier Onclin (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Hugo GastonGaston (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Blake EllisEllis (7-64 7-65) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Sumit NagalNagal (6-2 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Jaime FariaFaria (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Taro DanielDaniel (7-62 6-2) – See score progression
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Jerome KymKym (7-66 7-64) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Hady HabibHabib (7-65 6-75 6-2) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Mattia BellucciBellucci (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Raphael CollignonCollignon (6-2 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova (3-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (7-65 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (6-3 7-65) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Vit KoprivaKopriva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
