Jacob Fearnley and James Kent Trotter will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Canberra Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:30 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jacob Fearnley who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jacob Fearnley is the pick to win this match.
Jacob Fearnley -> 1.41
James Kent Trotter -> 2.73
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jacob Fearnley vs. James Kent Trotter
There is no head to head record between Jacob Fearnley and James Kent Trotter since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Jacob Fearnley
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-27 | 11-10 | 10-6 | 9-7 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 45-9 | 10-2 | 0-0 | 26-4 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 17-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 16-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 99, Fearnley got to the 2nd round after beating Matthew Dellavedova 3-6 6-4 7-5.
In the 1st round against Dellavedova, The Brit recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 7-5). During the match, Fearnley scored 106 points vs Dellavedova’s 102. Jacob was pretty aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about the service games, Fearnley made 6 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Overall, Jacob Fearnley was quite effective on serve to win 77% (41/53) of his 1st serve and 57% (27/47) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Fearnley broke Dellavedova twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Fearnley has a fantastic match record in the last 4 years having won 79% of his matches (73-19). 10-2 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Fearnley has a composed20-6 win-loss record in the last 4 years on hard.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Nottingham 2 Challenger where he overcame Charles Broom in the final 4-6 6-4 6-3 and the Lincoln Challenger where he defeated Chak Lam Coleman Wong in the final 6-4 6-2 and the Rennes Challenger where he defeated Quentin Halys in the final 0-6 7-6(5) 6-3 and the Orleans Challenger where he defeated Harold Mayot in the final 6-3 7-6(5).
Jacob has a compiled 45-9 win-loss record in 2024, 10-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Canberra Challenger
Fearnley has never competed in this tournament before.
James Kent Trotter
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-26 | 16-15 | 3-3 | 6-5 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-23 | 19-12 | 1-3 | 21-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-13 | 15-10 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-11 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 193, Kent got to the 2nd round after beating Pavle Marinkov 6-3 6-4, Roman Andres Burruchaga 6-1 6-4 and Jerome Kym 7-6(6) 7-6(4).
In the 1st round, Kent had a good straight sets win against Kym (7-66 7-64). During the match Kent scored 88 points vs Kym’s 75. James was extremely aggressive to blast 47 winners.
About the serving games, Kent managed to score 13 aces and he was very consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. James Kent Trotter was very efficient on serve to win 82% (47/57) of his 1st serve and 68% (13/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match.
His best result of the current season was conquering the title the Tyler Challenger where he defeated Brandon Holt in the final 6-2 7-6(3) and the Charlottesville Challenger where he overcame Nishesh Basavareddy in the final 6-3 6-4.
Kent has an aggregate 41-23 win-loss record in 2024, 19-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Fearnley | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 62 |
| Pts | 106-102 | 208-161 |
| Total Points | 208 | 369 |
| Winners | 41 | 99 |
| %Winners | 39% | 48% |
Fearnley played 1 match while Kent competed in 3 matches. Kent started his run from the qualifications while Fearnley had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Jacob Fearnley dropped 1 set while James Kent Trotter hasn’t conceded a set so far. Fearnley has played 3 set(s) less than Kent (3 vs 6). Therefore, Fearnley played 31 games less than Kent. Jacob scored 41 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Kent recorded 99 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Fearnley | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 27 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 9 |
| 1st in | 53/100 | 118/181 |
| %1st in | 53% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 41/53 | 99/118 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 27/47 | 38/63 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 60% |
Fearnley fired 6 aces . Kent managed to score 27 aces (9 per match). Fearnley won 77% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Kent won 84% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Fearnley | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 6 |
| Converted | 2/4 | 6/17 |
| % Converted | 50% | 35% |
| Conceded | 6 | 7 |
| Saved | 5 | 6 |
| % Saved | 83% | 86% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Jacob broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. Jacob dropped his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. Kent broke his opponents 6 times with a 35% conversion rate. James conceded his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
| Fearnley | |||
| R1 Dellavedova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 106-102 | 106-102 | |
| Total points | 208 | 208 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 53/100 | 53/100 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 41/53 | 41/53 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 27/47 | 27/47 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Kent | |||||
| Q1 Marinkov |
Q3 Andres Burruchaga |
R1 Kym |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | 6-1 6-4 | 7-66 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 17 | 26 | 62 | |
| pts | 64-47 | 56-39 | 88-75 | 208-161 | |
| Total points | 111 | 95 | 163 | 369 | |
| Winners | 29 | 23 | 47 | 99 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 41% | 53% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | 13 | 27 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 34/55 | 27/50 | 57/76 | 118/181 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 54% | 75% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 29/34 | 23/27 | 47/57 | 99/118 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | 82% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/21 | 12/23 | 13/19 | 38/63 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 52% | 68% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 4/8 | 0/2 | 6/17 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 50% | 0% | 35% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 3/4 | 2/2 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 75% | 100% | 275% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWWLWL
LWLWLWWLWL Tennis Scores in Canberra Challenger
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Blake EllisEllis (7-64 7-65) – See score progression
- Hayden Jones/Pavle MarinkovJones/Pavle Marinkov – Hugo Gaston/Gauthier OnclinGaston/Gauthier Onclin (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Hady HabibHabib (7-65 6-75 6-2) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Sumit NagalNagal (6-2 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Joao FonsecaFonseca – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Hugo GastonGaston (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Taro DanielDaniel (7-62 6-2) – See score progression
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Jerome KymKym (7-66 7-64) – See score progression
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (6-3 7-65) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (7-65 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Raphael CollignonCollignon (6-2 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova (3-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Mattia BellucciBellucci (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Hady HabibHabib (7-6(5) 6-7(5) 6-2) – See score progression
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Blake EllisEllis (7-6(4) 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Sumit NagalNagal (6-2 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Joao FonsecaFonseca – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Vit KoprivaKopriva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
